美国国家航空航天局刚刚意识到，中国的太空计划更出色、甚至更先进

NASA just realized that China Space program is BETTER & even ADVANCED, but SpaceX

美国国家航空航天局（NASA）刚刚意识到，中国的太空计划更出色、甚至更先进

以下是各国网友的评论：

USAKaput

Neil Armshit never landed on the moon....he landed on the filming studios of hollywood

尼尔·阿姆斯特朗根本没登上月球，他是在好莱坞的摄影棚里“着陆”的。

rnwaterpurification1030

Absolutely right. It is Hollywood movie.

太对了。就是部好莱坞电影。

Anonymous

Their hip HOP break dancing gave them away, no one in real life would do that on the moon.

他们跳的嘻哈街舞露馅了，现实中没人会在月球上干这种事。

Billck24

If they have why they stop sending to the moon? We are not dumb.

要是他们真去过，为什么不再派人去月球了？我们可没那么好骗。

Diveal0t_wallyWombat

CHINA will far exceed the USA's achievements with its Space Stations, Moon Base and Satellites. This will enable China to take control of Satellite Surveillance activities, including selective destruction to give them the necessary defence advantages needed for War. Positioning of spaced Space Stations, Satellites, Missilite Bases and Automonous Manufacturing and Research Bases in Orbit and Moon Based. Placing their major infrastructure a 1,000 kilometers further out will give them total domination to handle any conflicts with impunity. Remember China thinks in Decads and Centuries, not just short term Electoral periods periods.

中国凭借空间站、月球基地和卫星，成就将远超美国。这会让中国掌控卫星监控，包括选择性摧毁能力，从而获得战争所需的防御优势。把空间站、卫星、导弹基地以及轨道和月球上的自主制造与研究基地分散部署，主要设施再往外移1000公里，他们就能完全掌控局面，应对任何冲突都不用担责。记住，中国的规划以数十年、数百年计，不只是短期的选举周期。

anotech_republika

No need to watch. Here is the summary from ChatGPT: China’s space program is rapidly gaining power, with a lunar base planned by 2036, its own space station built in just over a year (vs. over 10 years for the ISS), and increasing use of reusable rockets—challenging U.S. leadership as NASA still leads in funding, private innovation (e.g. SpaceX), and satellite numbers. While the U.S. maintains the edge for now, China’s fast, methodical progress threatens long-term dominance.

不用看了。这是ChatGPT的总结：中国太空计划迅速崛起，计划2036年建成月球基地，自己的空间站一年多就建成（国际空间站花了10多年），可重复使用火箭的使用也在增加——这对美国的领先地位构成挑战。尽管NASA目前在资金、私人创新（如SpaceX）和卫星数量上仍占优势，但中国快速、有序的进展对美国的长期主导地位构成威胁。

petersaw3379

China is gaining in every field.. You name it and they are there EXCEPT in SOCCER.. They couldn't produce a an eleven Member team that could even qualify for FIFA WORLD CUP

中国在各个领域都在进步。你随便说一个，他们都有建树，除了足球。他们连一支能晋级世界杯的11人球队都凑不出来。

madsam0320

@petersaw3379 their women footballers are very good, getting to finals more often than not. Football is not popular in China, table tennis they are champs.

他们的女足很不错，经常进决赛。足球在中国不火，他们乒乓球是冠军。

g.m.8360

Who is competing the only one competing is the United States. Just how much of the US programs are done by Chinese engineers and researchers? It’s literally is like America needs China to compete with China?

谁在竞争？只有美国在自嗨。美国的项目有多少是中国工程师和研究人员参与的？

touraroundtheworld7190

I start to wonder. Is it really true the US did make it ever to space or the moon. They need the help from amateurs to go to space or the moon. Or was it all a Walt Disney movie

我开始怀疑了。美国真的上过太空或月球吗？他们需要业余爱好者帮忙才能去太空或月球。还是说这一切都是华特·迪士尼的电影？

Anonymous

If humans can pass through the Van Allen Belts, don't you think they are doing that today? Obviously no human has ever passed through the Van Allen Belts.

如果人类能穿过范艾伦辐射带，你觉得他们现在不会这么做吗？显然，从来没有人穿过范艾伦辐射带。

erwinchn

China’s private space sector is booming now with strong support from government and venture investors. This is inspired by SpaceX’s huge success in both technology and economy.

中国的民营航天现在蓬勃发展，得到政府和风险投资者的大力支持。这是受到了SpaceX在技术和经济上巨大成功的启发。

erwinchn

Plus on the engineering side Chinese are no lack of confidence on project execution and commitment. The only obstacle is reusable rocket, multiple private companies are testing it. Once cleared, we will expect more launches than SpaceX.

而且在工程方面，中国人对项目执行和投入毫不缺乏信心。唯一的障碍是可重复使用火箭，多家民营企业正在测试。一旦攻克，发射次数有望超过SpaceX。

joelchoy312

ISS is like a spagetti kid's room while Tian Goon (Heaven Palace in Chinese) is the real international space station. Bill Nelson can demand whatever budget from congress he wants. The reality is t he US doesn't have $ period while national debt is 36 trillions.

国际空间站就像个乱糟糟的小孩房间，而天宫才是真正的国际空间站。比尔·纳尔逊可以向国会索要预算，但现实是美国没钱了，国家债务都36万亿美元了。

agusedyanto3324

I think it's not just a funding issue, but technical issues and technological capabilities are also problematic.

我觉得这不只是资金问题，技术问题和技术能力也有问题。

fredericlaimink658

Les chinois seront pour de vrai les premiers humains à mettre le pied sur la lune.

中国人将真正成为第一批登上月球的人类。

strongchallenger2269

what about it? If the US has gone to the moon, tell us why they can't repeat the same technology as they have done it before? I mean obviously they should be able to improve on the old technology and get to the moon without issue. For the Chinese, it would be far more difficult because they don't have the data but they have the technology to boot.

那又怎样？如果美国去过月球，告诉我们为什么他们不能重复使用以前的技术？显然他们应该能改进旧技术，顺利重返月球。对中国人来说，难度要大得多，因为他们没有这些数据，但他们有技术基础。

lenhsaudis4la

How is it a comparison when the US does it with help from a dozen other countries but China does it by themselves? China is already in a class of its own there.

美国靠十几个国家帮忙，中国靠自己，这怎么比？中国在这方面已经独一档了。

kristoffereberius2476

True, and China was blocked by the US to join the iss, yet when China started its own they have consistently invited and encouraged international collaboration. The only reason the Russians are part of the iss is their experience with Mir and the US reliance on Russian rockets to get there. The US have consistently relied on the Russians to get their astronauts and modules into space. When the iss is done and the US can consistently get to space themselves the Russians will surely collaborate with China

没错，美国阻止中国加入国际空间站，但中国自己搞空间站后，一直邀请和鼓励国际合作。俄罗斯参与国际空间站，只是因为他们有和平号空间站的经验，而美国需要靠俄罗斯的火箭进入太空。美国一直依赖俄罗斯把宇航员和舱段送入太空。等国际空间站退役，美国能自己稳定进入太空后，俄罗斯肯定会和中国合作。

face789

Does NASA actually build anything or do they just license others to build for them.

Is NASA anything other than a building and a bunch of cash.

NASA真的自己造东西吗？还是只授权别人为他们制造？NASA难道不就是一栋楼和一堆钱吗？

jimeditorial

NASA has a limited design and build capability for spacecraft, but they have always used commercial Aerospace contractors to build the hardware. The giant Saturn V used stages which were built by the large aircraft companies. The first stage was a NASA effort, but was assembled with Aerospace contractors, and of course all the engines were outsourced. This has been one of the long-term goals of nasa, to get out of the hardware and space launch business and focus on the research goals instead.

NASA设计和制造航天器的能力有限，他们一直靠商业航天承包商制造硬件。巨大的土星五号的各级是由大型航空公司制造的。第一级是NASA主导，但由航天承包商组装，当然所有发动机都是外包的。这一直是NASA的长期目标之一：退出硬件和太空发射业务，转而专注于研究目标。

KonglengLee-t6l

India and US should collaborate on moon landing either thru hollywood or bollywood. Indians version should be more convincing like their cartoonish atari rocket lamding

印度和美国应该合作登月，要么通过好莱坞，要么通过宝莱坞。印度版应该更有说服力，就像他们那卡通式的雅达利火箭着陆一样。

fredericlaimink658

Des américains sur la lune? Quelle plaisanterie.

美国人真的上了月球？真是个笑话。

notchit3542

The crazy part is that they only shifted to tech like 25 years ago, instead of just cheap plastic toys, T-shirts, & kitchenware.

疯狂的是，他们大约25年前才转向科技领域，不只是生产廉价塑料玩具、T恤和厨具。

agusedyanto3324

What would be even crazier is if the "technology from 25 years ago" was just a product of Hollywood, not in real practice

更疯狂的是，如果“25年前的技术”只是好莱坞的产物，而不是实际存在的。

sharynbaker1266

It’s a shame that American corporations waisting more time jockeying their power struggles than cooperative strategies!
Research the Avro aircraft and see how long it’s been struggling for dominance instead of cooperating together!

可悲的是，美国企业把更多时间浪费在权力斗争上，而不是合作策略上！去了解一下阿弗罗飞机公司，看看他们为了争夺主导地位而挣扎了多久，却不选择合作！

rtc3000

This will never happen if NASA didn't exclude China into ISS.

如果NASA没有拒绝中国加入国际空间站，就不会发生这种事。

LeonLKC

Is the U.S. able to land its astronauts earlier than China? On whom would you place your bet?

美国能比中国更早让宇航员登月吗？你会把赌注压在谁身上？

BartandRoxanne

China is Learning from the USA. I am glad they are doing well

中国在向美国学习。很高兴他们做得不错。

willdsm08

Unfortunately, Musk is so concentrated on Mars that Earth orbit and the Moon have lost all meaning to him. China will take what it wants, and Mars will be left all alone with nowhere to go.

不幸的是，马斯克太专注于火星了，地球轨道和月球对他来说已经毫无意义。中国会得到他们想要的，而火星会被孤零零地抛在一边，无处可去。

imbalancedstatus8824

I doubt the just realized that.. maybe they are just publicly admitting it.

我怀疑他们早就意识到了，也许只是公开承认而已。

stevenburns704

Why does everything have to be about wng, being first, beating your chest I'm number 1 ???
This thinking is a weakness & leads to risks and mistakes.
First to the north pole, first to the south pole, first satellite, man on the moon, first this, first that..........and now it doesn't matter, it made no difference.
One upmanship & vanity is a weakness not a strength no matter what side of the pacific you're living on.

为什么每件事都必须关乎胜利、争第一、炫耀自己是第一？这种想法不可取，会导致风险和错误。第一个到北极，第一个到南极，第一颗卫星，人类登月，这个第一，那个第一……现在这些都不重要了，没什么区别。无论你住在太平洋的哪一边，这种攀比和虚荣都是要不得的，不是优点。

erikjvanderveen

Yeah, It seems the US likes Chinese progress not as much as Chinese food.

是啊，看来美国对中国的进步，不像对中餐那么喜欢。

nlee8801

India can ask how to land on the moon from NASA.

印度可以向NASA请教如何登月。

Emiliocab47

Don't worry Starship will make a successful LEO test flight around about flight 200

别担心，星际飞船大约在第200次飞行时会成功完成近地轨道测试飞行。

NathanZar

Why the USA has not returned to the moon? Why other countries have not been there?

为什么美国没重返月球？为什么其他国家也没去过？

yu-jd5jg

Is the Hegemonic US going to sanction space for allowing China to venture deeply into space?

霸权主义的美国会因为太空允许中国深入探索而制裁太空吗？

MichaelDb-uq9dn

How did out astronauts deal with the Van Allen belt ? , I have 20 more Questions after that but let’s start there

我们的宇航员是怎么应对范艾伦辐射带的？这之后我还有20多个问题，先从这个开始吧。

EddyKorgo

Chinas space program isnt powerful. They just dont have any restrictions like US have
No safety
No budget limits
Thats the only reason what allowed China to accelerate SO MUCH.
Plus Chinese engineers are very talented if not more talented then NASA engineers because NASA has years and years of experience where China is very young in this department and achieved all that NASA achieved in 50 years just in a few years only because China has a clear goal were NASA is just a job contractor.
China has already put NASA to shame but not because China is better but because NASA is incompetent and too scared and limited by government, bad decision, lobbying and no radical ideas of develo new technology, instead sticking to 50 years old technologies (but not surprising because the way NASA operates would took another 50 years to prove that technology just ON A PAPER)

中国的太空计划并不强大。他们只是没有美国那样的限制。没有安全限制，没有预算限制。这是他们能如此快速发展的唯一原因。

而且中国工程师很有天赋，就算不比NASA的工程师更有天赋，也差不到哪去。因为NASA有多年的经验，而中国在这一领域还是新手，却在短短几年内就取得了NASA用了50年才取得的成就，这只是因为中国有明确的目标，而NASA只是个承包商。

中国已经让NASA颜面尽失，这不是因为中国更优秀，而是因为NASA无能、太胆小，还受到政府、糟糕决策、游说的限制，没有开发新技术的激进想法，反而固守50年前的技术