上海造船公司向意大利交付9000车位的巨型汽车运输船，建造周期仅179天，创下纪录

Shanghai delivers mega 9,000-car carrier to Italy in just 179 days

上海仅用179天向意大利交付9000车位的巨型汽车运输船

China’s Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Friday delivered its first 9,000-car carrier, the Grande Tianin, to Italy’s Grimaldi Group, its 600th vessel since 2003, totaling over 102 million deadweight tons. Built in a record 179 days, the 200-meter ship can haul 9,000 vehicles up to 250 tons across its 14 decks.

On Aug 19, it will sail to Europe carrying Chinese startup automobile manufacturer Leapmotor’s 1 millionth EV.

For Grimaldi, China’s speed, quality and EV export growth were key factors.

The ship uses a new low-fuel engine and a shore power system ensures zero emissions while docked. It’s also certified “Ammonia Ready” that can be upgraded in the future to run on clean, zero-carbon fuel, part of China’s bigger push into low-carbon ship.

中国上海外高桥造船有限公司于周五向意大利格里马尔迪集团交付了首艘9000车位汽车运输船“Grande Tianin”号。这是该公司自2003年以来建造的第600艘船，总载重吨超过1.02亿吨。这艘船长200米，拥有14层甲板，可搭载9000辆汽车（单辆最重250吨），建造周期仅179天，创下纪录。

8月19日，该船将起航前往欧洲，搭载中国初创汽车制造商零跑汽车的第100万辆电动汽车。

对格里马尔迪集团而言，中国的建造速度、工程质量以及电动汽车出口的增长是促成合作的关键因素。

这艘船搭载了新型低油耗发动机，配备的岸电系统可确保停靠期间零排放。它还获得了“氨燃料就绪”认证，未来可升级为使用清洁零碳燃料——这也是中国大力推进低碳航运的举措之一。

以下是各国网友的评论：

SevenBee-q2j
Chinese supply chains and manufacturing processes are astounding, being literally decades ahead of the US & West

中国的供应链和制造流程太牛了，比美国和西方领先几十年。

mudshovel289
Your own age group in your country are also decades ahead of you

你们国家同龄人的水平也比你领先几十年呢。

isaacbonjo3361
179 days you can only get that type of speed in china

179天建成，这种速度只有在中国才能实现。

jrkr7357
Fruit of hard work.

这是辛勤付出的成果。

jarednovel
I can see the US on my rear view mirror

我从后视镜里都能看到美国了

Mallan_
"This is a threat to US national security," I heard someone saying in Washington!

“这对美国国家安全构成威胁，”我听到华盛顿有人这么说了！

urimtefiki226
Italians will drive new cars.

意大利人能开上新汽车了。

paulrobbieparker3983
They will too.............they don't have a choice

他们也会用上，反正没得选。

jarednovel
Welcome to our new world

欢迎来到我们的新世界。

Abir774-r8w
glory to china

荣耀属于中国。

user-cx5wq9rn6e
mind blowing

太震撼了。

Nozthedon1
I’m British and I can see in the future the whole world will have Chinese robots in there houses

我是英国人，我能预见未来全世界的家里都会有中国机器人。

laicheetian4737
China capable of building mega cargo vessel in 6 months is out of the ordinary. Cut cost and delivery time benefit both buider and buyer

中国能在6个月内造出巨型货船，这太不一般了。降低成本、缩短交付时间，对买卖双方都有好处。

K.T-PARA
Would have taken the US like 4 years to build lol

换成美国的话，估计得花4年才能造出来，哈哈。

paulrobbieparker3983
And 3 times overbudget.

而且预算还会超支3倍。

mealien0808
China lives in 2050

中国发展超前，仿佛生活在2050年

sunshinesun121
Not OWNED by Chinese or Managed by Chinese Owners. Leased for Italy Owners.

这船不是中国所有，也不是中国船东管理，是租给意大利船东的。

willgates8383
This is great for China, Italy supplying the capital for Chinese production and building the supply ships for Chinese EV exports !!!! China needs more of this from the whole world

太棒了，意大利为中国生产提供资金，还为中国电动车出口建造运输船！中国需要更多国家这样合作。

ghostparticle88
This after Meloni withdrew from "BRI"

这还是在梅洛尼退出“一带一路”之后呢。

georgewinner4818
There going to flood the market with these crap cars second hand cars will be worthless

他们会把这些破车堆满市场，二手车都要变得一文不值了。

robertdakic6503
Yemen won’t sink a chines ship.

也门不会击沉中国船只的。

kScott-n4f
The Houthis have no reason to attack Chinese ships. They're not just attacking ships indiscriminately. You said it yourself, the car carrier that was attacked back in the day was run by an Israeli company.

胡塞武装没理由袭击中国船只。他们不会乱袭击的。你自己也说过，以前被袭击的那艘汽车运输船是以色列公司运营的。

etta
Yeah, building 51% of all ships means they build more ships than the rest of the world combined.

没错，建造全球51%的船舶，意味着他们造的船比世界其他地方加起来还多。

wat4389
America：On Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, it's the China-collapse theory; on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays, it's the China-threat theory. Sundays are for rest and relaxation

美国：周一、周三、周五说“中国崩溃论”；周二、周四、周六说“中国威胁论”；周日休息放松。

nzerV-w3x
this story failed to mention US never achieve market dominant in commercial ship building cause the quality and cost simply not competitive on a global scale

这则新闻没提，美国在商业造船领域从未占据主导地位，其质量和成本在全球范围内根本没有竞争力。

cy5vs
US has more than 300 military bases surrounding China, and you blaming China for building ships.

美国在中国周围有300多个军事基地，却还指责中国造船。

step4life
The real problem is China main focus is always on the commercial side. While US main focus is military. One actually makes economic sense, while the other just drains the tax payers.

真正的问题是，中国重心一直在商业领域，而美国重心在军事。一个实际创造经济价值，一个只会消耗纳税人的钱。

g3487
If USA does not spend $3 trillion for wars in the past 2 decades, USA can have a decent shipbuilding industry

如果美国过去20年没花3万亿美元打仗，现在应该能有个像样的造船业。

m1986
China had been building the largest and most elaborate naval fleet in the world during the Ming Dynasty before America even exsted.

在美国诞生之前，中国明朝就已经建造出世界上规模最大、最精良的海军舰队了。

wser3054
I worked at a shipyard in San Diego for 2 months. There was no overtime offered, the pay was so low I couldn’t survive in San Diego. I had to quit and go back to my old job

我在圣地亚哥的一家造船厂工作过两个月。没有加班费，工资低得在圣地亚哥活不下去。我只好辞职回老东家了。

N6tQ2mL4
Shipbuilding industry is an interesting one, which is Capital, Technology/Engineering and Labor intensive simultaneously and you know which three the US misses. Unlike what WSJ portrayed, the commercial ship building center transitioned from Europe->Japan->South Korea and now (partially) China. US never dominates it and is always MIC driven.

造船业很有意思，它同时需要资本、技术/工程和劳动力密集投入，而美国恰恰缺这三样。不像《华尔街日报》说的那样，商业造船中心是从欧洲转移到日本，再到韩国，现在部分到了中国。美国从未主导过这个领域，而且一直受军事工业复合体驱动。

yk7712
Ship building is the sign of national strength, Just like aircraft manufacturing. They both link to comprehensive national strength, it's not as simple as just building ship or aircraft. Behind Boeing or Lockheed, there's hundred high tech company and behind China shipyard also there's hundred high tech company. Without f35, united states military would be a joke, navy is ok but they are aging. US Navy can't be replaced as fast as China did. If both country collide, whoever build most ship and aircraft will be the winner, just like in ww2 united states dominated Germany and help UK to fight the nazi

造船和造飞机一样，是国力的象征。两者都关系到综合国力，不只是造个船或飞机那么简单。波音、洛克希德背后有上百家高科技公司，中国造船厂背后也有上百家高科技公司。没有F-35，美国军队就是个笑话，海军还行但在老化。美国海军更新换代的速度赶不上中国。如果两国发生冲突，谁造的船和飞机多谁就是赢家，就像二战时美国靠造得多打败德国、帮英国对抗纳粹一样。

chriswuu
The Chinese state system certainly has some advantage in manufacturing e.g. lower cost, higher efficiency and etc. it has become a dilemma for the US and it’s adapting protectionism to cope with China Shock 2.0 which seems a bit hypocritical because the US used to promote so called free trade/free market so hard

中国的国家体制在制造业确实有优势，比如成本更低、效率更高等。这让美国陷入困境，于是用保护主义应对“第二次中国冲击”，这显得有点虚伪，因为美国以前一直在大力宣扬所谓的自由贸易/自由市场。

eDing
us ship building was never competitive since Jones act, which was more than 100yrs old by now. even around WII, which was the highlight moment of us shipyards, they built ships at twice the average global cost. now, us ship building cost is more than 10 times the global average.

自从《琼斯法案》出台后，美国造船业就从没具备过竞争力，这法案到现在都有100多年了。即便在二战前后——美国造船厂的鼎盛时期，他们造船成本也是全球平均水平的两倍。现在，美国造船成本是全球平均水平的10倍多。

wind4632
One side always complains, criticizes and bad mouths the other side all the time. The other side diligently gets things done.

一边总是没完没了地抱怨、批评、说坏话。另一边踏踏实实地在做事。