中国如何打下一代战争，配备了相应的作战理论、训练体系和火力装备

How Will China Fight Its Next War?

中国如何打下一代战争？

China’s military is transforming fast—armed with doctrine, drills, and firepower. From Taiwan blockades to global ambitions, here’s how the PLA is preparing to fight (and maybe win) tomorrow’s wars.

中国军队正快速转型——配备了相应的作战理论、训练体系和火力装备。从封锁台湾到实现全球野心，中国人民解放军正为打赢未来战争（或许真能打赢）做准备。

以下是各国网友的评论：

seventeeen29

I'm glad the world has calmed down enough for hypothetical videos to be back on the schedule

我挺高兴的，世界总算平静些了

briskandpepsi

it’s only wars we hear about. Ukraine is still under attack. It’s pretty sad.

我们只听说了一部分战争而已。乌克兰还在遭攻击呢。挺让人难过的。

Anson_Tanson

If you understand modern Chinese history, you'll know why China must vigorously develop its military strength. Backwardness leaves one vulnerable to attack; the world is far from peaceful. International society essentially operates under the law of the jungle. Only with strength can we safeguard peace and enable our people to live and work in security. As The Art of War teaches: 'To stop war through preparedness for war,' and 'to subdue the enemy without fighting.'

懂中国近代史的话，就知道中国为什么得大力发展军力。落后就要挨打，世界远没到太平的时候。国际社会说到底还是弱肉强食。有实力才能保和平，才能让老百姓安居乐业。《孙子兵法》里说：“以战止战”“不战而屈人之兵”。

jasonsiu6368

No country in the world is as aggressive as USA

世界上没有哪个国家像美国这么好斗。

ian_lambert-knight

Yeah no, Not even lately.

可不是嘛，最近也这样。

dekushroom

You’re so wrong lol

你错得太离谱了，哈哈。

jasonsiu6368

History Stated: there is only one country that deployed nuclear weapons on other nation, guess which one was that no need to read much, just need to watch normal fact news is good enough to independently judge

历史摆在那儿：只有一个国家在别的国家投过核武器，猜猜是哪个？不用读太多书，看看正常的新闻，就能自己判断出来。

johnsilver9338

So Russia's 3 day special operation turned to 3 years in Ukraine is exempted?

那俄罗斯在乌克兰的“三天特别军事行动”拖成三年，就不算了？

wangq-k4d

I'm genuinely curious how people in the comments section perceive the United States and its European NATO allies. No matter how you look at it, the actions of the U.S. and Europe in the post-Cold War world have been far more egregious, haven't they?

The U.S. and European NATO countries have participated in invasions of countries and regions including Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. The historical context and legal justifications for these invasions simply cannot stand up to scrutiny.

我是真好奇，评论区的人怎么看美国和它的欧洲北约盟友。不管怎么说，冷战后美欧的所作所为要过分得多，不是吗？

美国和欧洲北约国家入侵过南斯拉夫、阿富汗、伊拉克、利比亚这些国家和地区。这些入侵的历史背景和法律依据，根本经不起推敲。

theconqueringram5295

We're really speed running sticks and stones.

我们简直是在加速退回刀耕火种的时代。

RAWDEAL064

One thing that's significant from the US Navy perspective, is the PLA-N has finally figured out how to do an underway replenishment. I got to witness the first one myself.

从美国海军的角度看，有件事很重要：中国海军终于搞懂怎么在航行中补给了。我亲眼见过他们第一次搞成这事。

yanjunwong473

No matter what stage human civilization reaches, it remains terrifyingly true that we cannot escape the law of the jungle. This is why Americans say: 'You're either at the table or on the menu.' China learned this through painful experience a century ago backwardness invites aggression. Our military development today is fundamentally about creating a peaceful environment for national development.

不管人类文明到了哪个阶段，我们都逃不过弱肉强食的法则，这太可怕了。美国人说：“要么坐在餐桌上，要么就出现在菜单上。”一个世纪前，中国有过惨痛的经历，知道落后就要挨打。现在发展军事，根本上是为国家发展创造和平环境。

garwynrosser8907

Let's be honest... It hasn't yet fought its first war yet.

说实话……中国还没打过第一仗呢。

IwasBraveFor2WholeSeconds

They're after the semi conductor factories

他们盯上了半导体工厂

arwing20

Pretty rich of the PRC to accuse anyone of cronyism
Irony is lost on these people

中国指责别人搞裙带关系，可真够讽刺的。这些人根本没意识到这有多讽刺。

timesplash3922

I suppose the most important question I have is are we living in 1939 or 1937 or 1936 or a 1930

我觉得最重要的问题是，我们现在是活在1939年、1937年、1936年，还是1930年代？

theawesomeman9821

I took a class where the professor had my fellow students and I war game a hypothetical conflict between China and the USA.

The rules were to use publicly available sources to back up your strategy and not proposing nukes or any action that would provoke either sides to use nukes.

我上过一门课，教授让我和同学模拟中美之间的假设冲突。

规则是，用公开来源的信息来支撑自己的策略，不能提议用核武器，也不能提议任何会引发双方动用核武器的行动。

HeavenRacer

China use capitalist word for their enemies. They grew because of capitalism and free market

中国用资本主义的那套说辞骂敌人。可他们是靠资本主义和自由市场发展起来的。

dark.matter-n4m

Same goes for the Soviets, they rely a lot of capitalist expertise and imports and even then, their satellites and allies aren't enough to cover the cost of running a centrally planned economy

苏联也一样，他们很依赖资本主义国家的技术和进口，即便这样，他们的卫星国和盟友也不足以支撑计划经济的运转成本。

lucasjleandro

Possible with half country in flood

半个国家都发着洪水，可能吗？

ucadardi9331

Came faster than ever

比以往任何时候都来得快。

damocles8417

If they fight the way they drive I think the US will be just fine.

要是他们打仗像开车那样，我觉得美国肯定没事。

dartdude4084

Or the way they make inferior everything

或者像他们造东西那样，什么都造得劣质。

yongdeng1813

The last time the US won a war was the gulf war in the early 1990s,and u brAg about how good u are?!?! But we do want yall to keep thinking like that…

美国上一次打赢战争还是1990年代初的海湾战争，你们还好意思吹自己多厉害？！不过啊，我们就希望你们一直这么想……

Grim-Medusa

Wait Russia was the 2cd strongest army before Ukraine,
Chinas combat experience: Philippines fishing boats.

等等，乌克兰战争前，俄罗斯还是第二强的军队呢。中国的作战经验：跟菲律宾渔船打交道。

DesertFernweh

Saying China has the most Naval Vessels is like saying North Korea has the most efficient power grid.

说中国海军舰艇最多，就好比说朝鲜的电网效率最高。

damien2198

Their Navy is receiving the whole French Navy every single year, and their boats look awesome

他们海军每年新增的舰艇数量，抵得上整个法国海军，而且他们的军舰看起来很棒。

Raven-lo4wm

I mean... They do. They don't have the most tonnage, but they definitely have the most ships

我是说，他们确实（舰艇最多）。他们总吨位不是最大，但舰艇数量肯定最多。

Skyhulk95

They do you can’t argue with numbers and facts even though your trying too

他们就是舰艇最多，你再想反驳也没用，数字和事实摆在那儿。

jacobscholtissek2410

no its true they have the most, it would be as saying India has the most Educated people.

不，他们确实最多，这就好比说印度有最多的受过教育的人。

FreetOfficial

lol cope hard . china has 247x times ship building capacity than the US so imagine in 3 -5 years who would have most tonnage and numbers

哈哈，别自欺欺人了。中国的造船能力是美国的247倍，想想三五年后，谁的总吨位和数量会最多。

charleswomack2166

The PLA will fall to adopt away from centralized control nor will they be able to adopt an allow.soldiers at the individual level to thiink outside the box. I have been to wat, and I canconfirm just how important this is.

解放军不会允许士兵在个人层面跳出固有思维。我上过战场，很清楚这一点有多重要。

rocksjoshua

People massively underestimate Chinas military capability. They are rapidly militarizing, and with they're massive production capabilities, they can and will expand rapidly. All I'm saying is if they out their focus on war, they could easily ramp up production that blows everyone else out the water.

人们大大低估了中国的军事实力。他们正在快速军事化，加上强大的生产能力，他们能够而且会快速扩张。我想说的是，要是他们一心搞战争，很容易就能扩大生产，把其他国家远远甩在后面。

tomshady3530

Losers who know nothing talk tactics and doctrine. Winners talk logistics.

一窍不通的失败者才谈战术和理论。赢家只谈后勤。

avidqin7033

It is wrong to say Chinese airforce is the third largest. It is far stonger than Russian airforce.

说中国空军是第三大，这不对。中国空军比俄罗斯空军强多了。

donaldlee8249

Most of China population live near the coast, so China must deter any war from reaching its coast.

中国大部分人口住在沿海地区，所以中国必须阻止战争蔓延到沿海。

nilaychaturvedi5243

The real ques is, where will CHINA fight it's next war since they hv entangled themselves into so many conflicts.

真正的问题是，中国卷入了这么多冲突，下一场战争会在什么地方打？

tomshady3530

Chinese havent been in war in 47 years. when they did, they got their behinds handed to them just over their border by a war weary vietnam a 50th their size. Im not worried.

中国人有47年没打过仗了。上一次打，就在边境被疲惫不堪的越南人收拾了，越南的规模还不到他们的五十分之一。我不担心。

ShadowJester-jg2gs

The question to ask is, how will China cope economically if western countries import from other countries such as Mexco, Brazil, Argentina and India. They've got a large population to feed and if they don't have any orders coming in to produce goods, that could have a massive impact

要问的是，要是西方国家从墨西哥、巴西、阿根廷、印度这些国家进口东西，中国经济该怎么应对。他们有庞大的人口要养活，要是没订单，后果可能很严重

三泰虎

中国如何打下一代战争，配备了相应的作战理论、训练体系和火力装备

相关推荐