三泰虎

孟买高等法院:因相爱而发生关系 不算强奸

Arvind T

1325

Arvind-6 hours ago

very good decisions but seems guy already suffered almost 5 years
I can see all lower courts still giving such punishment fr mutual sex ( when later girl turned against him) and HC and SC do release him but after several years. don't know when we come out of it . no one thinks ok boys side and his life

判得好,看来这家伙已经受苦5年了。

当女孩反咬一口的时候,所有的初级法院都会对相互的性行为判刑。很多年后,高等法院才会释放他。。不知道什么时候才能摆脱这种局面。没有人为男人和他的生活想一想。

 

Mailrsvp Xxxxxx

225

mailrsvp xxxxxx-6 hours ago

The court has rightly given its ruling. As every casual encounter may end up in blackmailing the men or accusing them of rape. Where it is casual encounter and has happened multiple times, just a mere promise to marry and later not doing it should not be construed as a rape.

法院作出了正确的裁决。一次偶然的相遇有可能指控他们勒索或强奸。但如果多次发生,仅仅因为本来是承诺结婚,后来没有做到,不应该被视为强奸。

 

5 Rvk

4736

Rvk-New Delhi-6 hours ago

Why only woman file rape case against man...why not Man do the same against a woman?. Why can't law understand that woman also rape man.

为什么只有女人会指控男人强奸。。。为什么没有男人这么指控女人呢??法律为什么不知道,女人也可以强奸男人?

 

Madhu N R

13467

Madhu N R-Trivandrum-8 hours ago

the judge needs his brain washed. Consent for sex and financial help was given foreseeing marriage. Caste was not a problem for the idiot to get an erection.

法官的脑子应该洗一洗。。是因为对婚姻的期许才有性关系和财务资助的。

 

Bhawani_shankar

2999

bhawani_shankar-6 hours ago

As reported in the news article, the sex was consensual, hence it cannot be termed rape. It can be tried as a case of cheating, as the basis of the complaint is the false promise of marriage.

正如新闻所报道的那样,性行为是双方自愿的,因此不能称之为强奸。它可以作为一个欺骗的案例,诉讼的基础是虚假的婚姻承诺。

 

Kanav Mangal

54

Kanav-4 hours ago

Love or not
A consent is a consent
Don't cry rape every time you get cheated
Nobody forced you to do anything

爱或不爱

同意了就是同意了

不要一被骗就喊强奸

没人强迫你

 

Harsh Kaul

3901

Harsh-8 hours ago

At least he should be punished for cheating.?

至少应该判他欺诈??

 

10 DON QUIXOTE

135

Don-9 hours ago

The assertion that the woman providing financial help to the guy equals to deep love and therefore consensual and the act of the man is not amounting to rape sounds to be in itself a miscarriage of justice. This must be appealed against in Supreme Court.

女人向男人提供经济援助就等于深爱?因此认定男人的行为不等于强奸,这是一种误判。应该向最高法院上诉。

 

Brij Vats

156

Brij-1 hour ago

Men should also be allowed to file false rape cases on women who ditch them for a richer Man

应该允许男性对那些抛弃他们、嫁给有钱男人的女性提出虚假强奸诉讼。

 

三泰虎原创译文,禁止转载!:首页 > 印度 » 孟买高等法院:因相爱而发生关系 不算强奸

()
分享到: