India just rejected the Hague court ruling on the Indus Waters Treaty.
New Delhi says the court had no authority to rule because the treaty requires disputes go through India's Permanent Commission first, not arbitration.
Here is what India is actually signalling
• Indus Waters Treaty remains in abeyance since Pahalgam attack in May 2025
• India asserts right to fully utilize waters allocated under treaty without external interference
• Court of Arbitration lacked jurisdiction because treaty mandates sequential dispute resolution process
• Permanent Indus Commission should handle disputes before any neutral expert or arbitration stage
• India pursuing comprehensive review and modification of 1960 treaty to reflect current realities
• Pakistan cannot use international courts to override India's right to use its own waters
• Water became strategic leverage after terror attack broke 65 years of treaty compliance
Pakistan took India's patience for granted for decades.
Now India is rewriting the rules of engagement on water itself.
印度刚刚拒绝接受海牙法院关于《印度河用水条约》的裁决。
印度政府表示，该法院无权作出此项裁定，因为条约规定相关争端必须先交由印度常设委员会处理，不能直接提交仲裁。
印度此番表态释放出以下核心信号：
1. 自2025年5月帕哈尔加姆袭击事件后，《印度河用水条约》便处于搁置状态；
2. 印度主张有权在不受外部干预的前提下，充分使用条约划分给本国的水资源；
3. 仲裁法庭对此案无管辖权，条约明确要求争端需按固定流程依次解决；
4. 任何争端必须先交由印度河常设委员会处理，之后才能交由中立专家或启动仲裁程序；
5. 印度正对1960年版条约开展全面复核与修订，使其适配当下现实局势；
6. 巴基斯坦无权借助国际法庭剥夺印度使用本国分配水源的合法权利；
7. 恐怖袭击打破双方长达65年遵守条约的局面后，水资源已成为印度的战略筹码。
数十年来，巴基斯坦一直肆意消耗印度的包容与忍耐。
如今，印度正重新制定水资源争端的博弈规则。
以下是印度网友的评论：
TheMilObserverr
India honoured the Indus Waters Treaty through three wars and countless terror attacks but rejected the Hague ruling the moment Pakistan weaponized the dispute, showing New Delhi will not accept external courts overriding its sovereign right to use its own waters
三次战争、无数恐怖袭击，印度此前始终遵守《印度河用水条约》。但巴基斯坦将水资源争端政治化、当成对抗工具后，印度直接拒绝海牙法庭裁决。这意味着印度绝不允许国际法庭凌驾于本国水资源主权之上。
Rameshuk5
Pakistan knows it cannot convince India without credible evidence and until then India will not release water. Moreover Pakistan cannot initiate any attack on India. So what next.? India has already said any more terrorist attack will be considered as act of war.
巴基斯坦明白，拿不出可靠证据就说服不了印度，在那之前印度不会放开水源。而且巴基斯坦不敢主动袭击印度。接下来会发生什么？印度早已表态，再发生恐怖袭击就等同于宣战。
U Ramesh Kumar
So next Pakistan will do some attack which will make India to attack them and they will play the victim card. I believe this is how things will unfold.
接下来巴基斯坦大概率会策划袭击，引诱印度反击，之后再装作受害一方博取同情，我觉得局势会这么发展。
Anon5author
Water threat is the right weapon against the evil from across our borders. How else to conquer evil?
用水资源施压，是对付境外敌对势力最好的手段，除此之外还有什么办法压制他们？
Krishna
What I say might be cruel. But, poisoning the waters we send is another way. Instead of making them suffer with thirst and hunger we can help them along to reach that end quickly.
我说的话可能很残忍，但我们输送过去的水源也可以投毒。与其让他们慢慢受饥渴折磨，不如直接让他们彻底完蛋。
Entangledtruths
Water is the weapon against evil and unrighteousness
水资源是对抗邪恶与不公的武器
Anil Katara
Sir..
The River generate in Bharat and flow in Bharat..
Bharat is using it's own neglected Rivers..
So.. What is Bharat doing..
It's not supposed to do..
We are not so Rich..
We give up our own Rivers..
先生，这些河流发源于印度，流经印度。
印度只是开发本国闲置的河流，我们哪里做错了？
我们并不富裕，凭什么白白让出本国河流的水资源。
Saloni Tandon
Pakistan can buy water from India going forward. Just like Saudi Arabia does!
以后巴基斯坦可以像沙特一样，花钱向印度买水。
Viraja R
Terror state Pakistan has no right to claim Indus Water
巴基斯坦这个滋生恐怖分子的国家，没有资格索要印度河水资源。
Sachin
ALLOCATED WATER..
That's the catch phrase
所谓“分配用水”，就是巴基斯坦拿来扯皮的借口。
DANISHKFD
Stop terrorism to have water. I think its pretty clear
停止支持恐怖主义，才能拿到水源，道理已经说得很明白了。
nagster
Screw Pakistan it’s time India shows the results of fucking with India
别管巴基斯坦了，是时候让挑衅印度的他们付出代价。
Flyingtastic
India needs a lesson...and shall get it
印度迟早会吃大亏，等着瞧。
IamWhtIam
145 billions pee is enough for them why do they want IWT.
14.5亿人日常生活用水都够他们用了，还非要争《印度河用水条约》的份额。
Sumit
6 times a day @ 2 ltrs per pee.
6 X 1.45 billion X 2 ltrs = 1.8 billion ltrs per day
每人每天排尿6次，每次2升。
14.5亿人一天就是18亿升生活用水。
SpadeAcademic
What if US says "Release water or Laser Eyes Children or Ajit Doval's children will be deported back to India"?
What will our response be?
如果美国放话：不放水，就把阿吉特·多瓦尔的家人遣返回印度，我们该怎么应对？
Shri
Why would US do that? What does it gain?
美国没必要这么做，这么做能得到什么好处？
SpadeAcademic
Nice dodge. But US wants to have a military base in Pak to target China, India and Iran. Remember, Pak is US' puppet and treats India like a doormat mostly. "Indians are ugly and therefore easy to be harsh towards" said Nixon.
So, anycase, back to my question.
回避问题没用。美国想在巴基斯坦驻军，以此牵制中国、印度、伊朗。巴基斯坦就是美国的傀儡，平时总欺负印度。尼克松都说过印度人不起眼，可以随意打压。回到我刚才的问题。
Sunil Raina
I don't think the U.S will risk its trade with India for Pakistan .
我认为美国不会为了巴基斯坦，牺牲和印度的贸易往来。
Purandar Sahu
Are you sleep wake up now, India already rejected there itself
别后知后觉了，印度早就明确拒绝裁决了。
IndiaVikas50
Pakistan loves to mess with fire each and every single time. Their stupidity can only be attributed to their low IQ because of generations of近亲通婚
巴基斯坦总爱主动惹祸。世代近亲结婚拉低国民智商，才会做出这么愚蠢的事。
GhalibJanan
Good , when Pakistan control water ,we will stop yours. No worries
说得好，要是巴基斯坦敢管控水源，我们就切断他们的供水，没什么好怕的。
SuperDuper
Go on india...i hope this will bring destruction for you
印度尽管强硬下去吧，但愿这场对峙会彻底拖垮你们。
Afaq Masroor
Get ready for this these jets will fire PL15 on that infrastructure which will divert Pakistani share of water
等着瞧，战机挂载霹雳15导弹，摧毁印度截留水源的水利设施。
Afaq Masroor
If our big brother China stopped water flow to India from Indus river and Brahmaputra then India's two most fertile states Punjab and Bengal will dry out please go for it India
我们的老大哥中国只要截断印度河、雅鲁藏布江的来水，印度最肥沃的旁遮普、孟加拉邦就会干涸，印度尽管强硬试试。
Himmat Rathore
Big bro indeed! China is your Sugar Daddy. Earlier, it was the USA and now It's Saudi Arabia along with China.
还老大哥呢，中国就是你们的金主。以前你们靠美国，现在又拉拢沙特和中国。
Peddy
Many many DUMB INDIANS will cry after this
这件事之后，大批印度人会后悔哀嚎。
Human
Pakistan Must end Funding of terrorism
IF pakistan did that
then Only Prime Minister will allow to open DAMS
巴基斯坦必须停止资助恐怖分子，只要做到这点，总理才会开闸放水。
Shreekant
Population of India increased due to infiltration from Bangladesh and Pakistan, hence more water is needed.
大量孟加拉、巴基斯坦人非法涌入，推高印度人口，国内用水需求自然上涨。
therealivc
Indus (both the civilization and the water treaty) belongs to India.
印度河文明、印度河用水条约，根源都属于印度。
Seven Sindhs
Treaty cannot be restored.
Pakistan must prepare to destroy every single waterworks on Indus, ganges and narmada basins.
条约不可能恢复。巴基斯坦要做好准备，摧毁印度河、恒河、纳尔默达河流域所有水利工程。
nly__Nation
Some spine shown by India
Hope it remains the same
印度这次总算硬气了一回，希望能一直坚持下去。
NII_Think_Tank
Yes. It’s India’s water. Stupid Nehru gave 80% indus water to Pakistan.
没错，水资源本就属于印度。当年尼赫鲁太过软弱，把八成印度河水分给了巴基斯坦。
Navnit patel
Correct... Indus water is our water, we need water for our own use, International Court has nothing to do with it... This our Govt Decision, our people's Decision... Don't meddling in India's matter
说得对，印度河的水是我们的，本国发展需要用水，国际法庭无权插手。这是政府、全体国民共同的决定，别干涉印度内政。
Odeke
International courts and UN cannot interfere in the internal matter’s of India with population of 1.4 billion
印度拥有14亿人口，联合国、国际法庭都无权干涉我国内政。
typhoon853
Nehru said during Indus water Treaty that he is buying Peace with it. But we never received Peace from Pakistan, so this Treaty is suo moto invalid. Nobody hell can force us to restore thus Treaty. It is only Pakistan itself can do so by accepting all demand of India.
当年签署条约时尼赫鲁说，想用水源换取和平。可巴基斯坦从未停止制造冲突，这份条约本身就自动失效。没人能强迫我们恢复条约，除非巴基斯坦全盘接受印度所有条件。
Anon5author
Great going, we need to hold this over Pakistan so they stopped sending murderous people across the border to kill Hindus. Water has not yet been stopped but it will if evil crosses our borders.
做得好，我们必须拿水源牵制巴基斯坦，逼他们停止派武装分子越境杀害印度教徒。目前还没断水，但只要敌人再越境，我们就会切断供水。
Neal Grover
INDUS IS INDIAN. IT'S IN THE NAME.
INDUS WATER BELONGS TO INDIA.
SIMPLE.
印度河，名字就带印度二字，河水理所应当归印度，道理就这么简单。
broke_n_broken2
Proud of Modi. I will vote for Modi and ask all my villagers to vote for him in 2029
为莫迪点赞。2029大选我会投莫迪，还会发动全村人一起支持他。
sarahb_765
Well done India. Now Asim munir will beg Modi.
印度做得漂亮，这下阿西姆·穆尼尔只能低头求莫迪放水。
stubbornST
It was an unfair Treaty!
India, the upstream country with over 6 times Pakistan’s population, was allocated only 20% of Indus water while Pak received roughly 80%
It should be 80-20 in favour of India for India’s 21st-century water & development requirements
India will change it!
这份条约极其不公平！印度地处上游，人口是巴基斯坦六倍多，却只分到两成印度河水，巴基斯坦拿走八成。
为满足印度21世纪发展用水需求，分水比例理应改成印度八成、巴基斯坦两成，印度一定会修改条约！
gerrard007
We should open the dams and cause floods in Pakistan on a regular basis. Destroy their agriculture for what little they have
我们可以定期开闸放水，在巴基斯坦境内制造洪灾，毁掉他们本就薄弱的农业。
Divyesh
Where were they when Pakistan was attacking India?
If you stayed silent or done nothing then do the same now
It’s simple as that
当年巴基斯坦袭击印度时，这些国际机构全都装哑巴。那现在也别出来指手画脚，就这么简单。
Helsinki
Yeah we are country of 1.4 billion people and our water requirements increased rapidly so we must use all the waters
我们有14亿人口，用水需求暴涨，必须充分利用全部河流资源。
Anil Chandhok
But India is unable to control or fully utilize the western rivers as it lacks the infrastructure.
但印度基建不足，没办法管控、充分利用西部几条河流。
Aditya Yadav
Why Hague Court is interfere in Internal matter of India ?
海牙法庭凭什么插手印度内政？
InstantInfo07
India's stand on the Hague Court over the Indus Waters Treaty hasn't changed-not in 2026, not in 2025, not even in 2023.
Long before the Pahalgam terror attack and the decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, India had already made its position crystal clear.
2023: India rejected the Hague-based Court of Arbitration's jurisdiction, calling it an illegally constituted body under the treaty.
2025: India again declared the Court's rulings "null and void."
2026: Same position. Same message. No recognition of the tribunal's authority.
This wasn't a sudden shift in policy.
It has been a consistent legal and diplomatic position maintained across multiple rulings over several years.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with India's interpretation, one thing is undeniable:
India's position has remained remarkably consistent.
针对海牙法庭、《印度河用水条约》一事，印度立场多年从未改变，2023、2025、2026三年态度完全一致。早在帕哈尔加姆恐袭、宣布搁置条约之前，印度就亮明了底线。
2023年：印度否认海牙仲裁庭管辖权，称该机构不符合条约规定，设立不合法。
2025年：再次宣布仲裁裁决完全无效。
2026年：立场不变，绝不承认仲裁庭权力。
这不是临时变更政策。
多年来，面对多轮裁决，印度法律、外交口径始终统一。
不管你认不认同印度的解读，有一点无法否认：
印度的态度从头到尾没有动摇。
此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 资讯 » 印度刚刚拒绝接受海牙法院关于《印度河用水条约》的裁决
巴基斯坦向印度发出呼吁：重新考虑搁置《印度河水域条约》