Shrikrishna Padhye
2302
Shrikrishna - mumbai - 1 hour ago

Judge is a fool.

法官是笨蛋

Desh Bandhu
3956
Desh Bandhu - 2 hours ago

These kind of decisions were not heard of during congress regime. Surprising indeed.

最高法院居然做出这样的规定啊，以前国大党执政的时候，闻所未闻。确实令人意外

Mahendra Sing Rajput Jr
344
Mahendra - 4 mins ago

Now railway will become more vigilant. Fine those who try to board a moving train

这下，印度铁路部门以后会格外警惕的，谁要是跳上已经开动中的火车，就对谁罚款

jassi singh
804
Jassi - 17 mins ago

If the accident is genuine then its okay..but what about ppl dancing and swinging holding train's door....i have seen many in mumbai local.....

真的出事了，赔偿也是应该的。不过，那些挂在火车门外的呢，我在孟买看到太多这样挂在火车外的乘客

Gentleman
11195
Gentleman - 1 hour ago

This does not make sense at all

一点也说不通

Mohanraj Cp
4285
Mohanraj - coimbatore - 1 hour ago

The railways can charge Re1 extra on all tickets to cover this contingency.

每位乘客多收一卢比就行了，用来赔偿出事故的乘客

sankalp kumar
2769
sankalp kumar - 1 hour ago

Illetrate judge

没文化的法官

mani
1528
Mani - 2 hours ago

good decision... SC should have asked railways to install automatic doors in trains and platform as well.

这个决定好，最高法院该让印度铁路为火车和站台安装自动门

Dileep
Dileep - Pune - 2 hours ago

I do not understand why should railways pay for reckless attitude of passenger!! Could the honourable court look into it again! There have to be proper reasoning for payment by railways.

为什么要让铁路部门赔偿那些粗心大意的乘客，搞不懂啊搞不懂！

法院就不能先好好调查下吗？让铁路部门赔偿，你也得有合理的理由！

Amit Thackrey
19865
Amit Thackrey - Mumbai - 3 hours ago

Stupid decision, SC should mind its own business by this Logic

这决定真荒唐。最高法院还是少管闲事吧