Why China's Destroyers Are Unstoppable (And What Actually Stops Them)

为何中国驱逐舰势不可挡（又有哪些能真正制约它们）

It’s longer than two football fields. It carries more missiles than any destroyer in the American fleet. And worst of all - it’s made in China.

Beiing is launching these Type 055 destroyers at a pace the US simply cannot match. The Chinese navy is now the largest in the world - and the gap is getting wider every year.

But as Washington scrambles for a solution, it has so far overlooked an interesting possibility. The best warships in the world are already out there - and they’re low-cost, fast to build, and fully equipped to go toe-to-toe with China’s finest. They’re just not where anyone has been looking for them

它的长度超过两个足球场，搭载的导弹数量超过美国海军任何一艘驱逐舰。而最让美方忌惮的是——这艘战舰由中国自主制造。

中国正以美国根本无法企及的速度批量列装055型驱逐舰。如今中国海军舰艇规模已位居全球首位，且这一领先差距还在逐年拉大。

就在美方仓促寻求应对之策时，却一直忽略了一个值得关注的可能性：全球顶尖的战舰其实早已问世。这类舰艇造价低廉、建造周期短，且配置完备，足以与中国最先进的驱逐舰正面抗衡，只是一直没被各方关注到。

以下是各国网友的评论：

Smith-gs9ml
Americas ship procurement is a diaster of gross mismanagement

美国军舰采购项目，完全是管理一塌糊涂的翻车现场。

ndyf4292
and seasoned with a lot of lobbying and bribery

里面还掺杂着大量利益游说和权钱交易。

AndyViant
Reactivate the 15 Ticonderoga-class cruisers in reserve. Simple fix.

把封存的15艘提康德罗加级巡洋舰重新启用就行，解决办法很简单。

PatienceHasLimits
@AndyViant simple yes, because surely putting 50 year old ships back along with their maintenance costs will be enough to challenge a modern warship.

想法倒是简单，可把五十年舰龄的老船重新启用，再算上高昂维护费，拿什么去抗衡现代化战舰？

Motor-City_Ben-Diesel
7 billion per Zumwalt class? How tf is that possible? I smell a lot of corruption and theft.

一艘朱姆沃尔特驱逐舰造价70亿美元？这简直离谱至极，明显有贪腐和暗中捞钱的猫腻。

EdwinSherwood
100%. Our defense contractors have been robbing us blind. Just look at any field they actually had to compete like space. Spacex came in and ate there lunch, they recieved 40% in less for crew dragon and completed it like 8 years ago while Starliner still isn’t operational. And now ULA doesn’t even want to try anymore because the profits not worth it with spacex there, meaning they can get way easier money robbing us on crap like this

说得太对了。本国军工承包商简直是明目张胆掏空国库。看看航天领域就知道了，SpaceX一进场就把老牌对手碾压了。载人龙飞船预算直接省了四成，八年前就完工投入使用，反观波音的星际客机到现在都没法正式服役。如今联合发射联盟也懒得竞争了，有SpaceX在赚不到暴利，索性靠着军舰这类项目薅纳税人的钱，躺着牟利。

spartancrown
Not corruption just typical U.S. defense industry nonsense combined with Naval leadership, see the constellation as a prime example.

这不单是贪腐，就是美国军工行业的一贯乱象，再加上海军高层决策不力，星座级护卫舰就是最典型的例子。

leananglesensor
The contractors in shipyards laugh all the way to the bank with taxpayer $$$$

造船厂承包商靠着纳税人的钱赚得盆满钵满，偷着乐。

AndyViant
A lot of it was in supporting the tech development costs of the rail guns and targeting equipment for them. Lead ships usually cost 300% - 400% of what the remaining unit production costs are

高昂造价很大一部分，是分摊电磁炮及配套瞄准设备的研发费用。军舰首舰造价，通常是后续量产舰的三到四倍。

helixator3975
If America dropped its defence spending to the NATO average (2.3% of GDP) it would roughly equal the combined defense budgets of the next five biggest spenders (China, Russia, Germany, India, and the United Kingdom) AND save $275 billion to put towards healthcare, infrastructure, education and tax cuts. But the Epstein Class will never allow it.

要是美国把国防开支降到北约平均水平，也就是GDP的2.3%，这笔钱基本等同于中、俄、德、印、英五大国防支出大国的总和。还能省下2750亿美元，投入医疗、基建、教育，还能减税。可美国顶层权贵阶层，绝不会允许这种事发生。

walkerig1
The consequence of operating a capitalist government.

这就是美式资本体制下政府治理的必然结果。

piotrd.4850
Inflation + program mismanagement + low production scale. Why do you think Ford costs 15 bln when Nimitz class costed < 4? Why do you think Burke's now cost more than LOW RATE PRODUCTION Zumwalts?

通胀失控、项目管理混乱、建造规模太小，三重因素叠加。福特号航母造价150亿美元，而早前尼米兹级还不到40亿，想过原因吗？阿利·伯克级驱逐舰现在造价，居然比少量量产的朱姆沃尔特还要贵。

federixeagleart5315
Bla bla bla The facts are that the type 055 carries yj-17 hypersonic glide missile's with 1000-1500 km range and the sm-6 at its maxmum estimate can hit at 500 km range, that means that the Chinese destroyer can operate with ease without being threatened.

空话不多说，事实摆在眼前。055大驱搭载鹰击17高超音速滑翔导弹，射程一千至一千五百公里。而美军标准6导弹最大预估射程只有五百公里。这意味着中国驱逐舰可以从容作战，完全不用担心被敌方威胁。

rsand54
When you don't provide a complete set of drawings and change requirements, costs can only go up.

图纸方案迟迟不定，建造标准还反复修改，造价只会一路飙升。

Martin-u4b
I read that the China to USA ship building capability was 200:1 not 3:1.

我看到一种说法，中美军舰建造能力差距不是3比1，而是达到了200比1。

robertgutheridge9672
Cost over runs are the normal for all united states military projects,
What was the last project that was on time and under budget for the US military ?
Never

美军所有军工项目超支早已成常态。试问美军上一个按时完工、不超预算的项目是什么？答案是从来没有。

andyf4292
China remembers the Opium wars and what the Japanese got up to.

中国铭记着鸦片战争的屈辱，也忘不了昔日日本的侵略行径。

hasx7062
Type 055s carry hypersonic missiles, carrier killers! Lol
There is no match from Korea and Japan

055大驱配备高超音速导弹，妥妥的航母杀手。日韩根本造不出同级别战舰。

annehersey9895
That the US picks up the over-run costs is totally absurd. With any other business deal, bids for time and cost for the service are submitted and one chosen. If I make a contract with so many widgets at X price to be delivered by X time and I don’t receive that then the contractor eats the costs. The US Military is just like a Co unist system where there is absolutely ZERO INCENTIVE to produce what you bid on by the time you said it would be done. In fact it is the opposite where it benefits the Shipyards to slow things down!

由美国政府全额承担项目超支，简直荒唐至极。普通商业合作都是先竞标工期和预算，敲定合作后，乙方若无法按时按价交付，就得自行承担损失。美军这套模式反倒像大锅饭，承包商压根没有按时按标完工的动力。更离谱的是，故意拖延工期，反而能让造船厂赚更多钱。

Starstreak170
The US navy can't even secure the Strait of Hormuz. Why does it think it stands a chance fighting China in its backyard.

美国海军连霍尔木兹海峡都守不住，凭什么觉得能在中国近海占到便宜？

TERMICOBRA
Insurance companies are the reason not the lack of US firepower. The is called an "Actuarial Blockade". Read up on the facts before you wag your tongue.

问题不在于美军火力不足，根源在保险公司的风控考量，这叫精算封锁。不了解实情就别随便乱发言。

zulkanainbaharuddin2185
Just wait the type 060, the 15,000 tons.
The type 055 is class as 10,000 tons.

等着看后续060型巡洋舰吧，排水量一万五千吨。现在的055型标准排水量一万吨。

johnsmith1953x
a fully loaded 055 is 14,000 tons.

055大驱满载排水量可达一万四千吨。

ericb.4358
Japan, South Korea and Italy are all good sources of advanced warships. WHY THE HELL CAN'T THE US NAVY CONTRACT THESE ALLIES TO BUILD THEM - AND WITHOUT DESIGN CREEP??

日韩、意大利都有成熟的先进军舰建造能力。美国海军为什么不把订单外包给盟友，还能避免设计方案不断改来改去？

seven.8228
Best of all it’s made in china

最让人佩服的是，这完全是中国制造。

onB-kw4th
I’m Chinese. After watching the video, I really can’t wrap my head around this and I’d like to ask ordinary Americans a question.
The U.S. military budget ranks first in the world by far. Yet whenever other countries catch up to America in warship production numbers or certain military technologies, the U.S. immediately claims it feels threatened.
How do you even justify this absurd logic to yourselves?
By that reasoning, isn’t it actually the U.S. that poses a threat to the entire world? It’s basically like: I can bully anyone I want, but if anyone else dares to match my strength, they’re suddenly a threat to me.
Honestly, I’ve never in my life heard such blatant bully logic.

我是中国人。看完这个视频我实在无法理解，想问问普通美国民众。美国军费遥遥领先全球，可一旦其他国家在军舰规模、军事技术上追平美国，美国立马就喊自己受到威胁。
这种离谱的双标逻辑，你们怎么自圆其说？

照这个道理，真正威胁全世界的难道不是美国吗？说白了就是：我可以随意欺压别国，别人一旦实力赶上我，就成了我的威胁。说实话，从没见过这么赤裸裸的强盗逻辑。

khalidpeer6766
Why wrost of all its made in CHina, all my cell phones are made in China, so too is my PC and most of my cars spare parts, and my fridge and my aircons and a lot of my clothes and a whole host of other things - so what is wrong with China making cool naval ships - its their own country

为什么非要刻意强调“最糟的是中国制造”？我的手机、电脑、汽车大部分配件，冰箱、空调、大半衣物，好多东西都是中国造。中国造出先进军舰有什么不妥？这本来就是人家自己国家的本事。

danor6812
A lot of what hampers American ship builders isn't the cost suddenly changing. It's the set design is constantly changed throughout the building process. That it's like they have to start over from scratch with every new add on or engine output. If the US would find a design and accept it, then actually go with that design. Without changing it every few weeks. You wouldn't have the cost over runs they constantly have.

美国造船业的最大瓶颈，不是成本突然上涨，而是建造中途不断修改设计方案。每新增一项配置、调整一次动力参数，几乎就要推倒重来。如果美国敲定一款设计就固定下来，不隔三差五随意改动，根本就不会出现频繁超支的问题。

luluapple1067
China should build at least 24 of the type 055

中国至少应该建造24艘055型驱逐舰。

UwUArmanDamian
They havw there type 055A and 055B plan

中国还有055A和055B的升级建造计划。

4-SeasonNature
They already have about 10.

目前已经服役大概10艘了。

YSKWatch
12 for original 055, will be added more for 055B. usually always multiplication of 3 because China have 3 theaters.

基础版055计划造12艘，后续还会增建055B型。数量基本都是3的倍数，适配中国三大海军战区布局。

charyoung8001
I read somewhere that a new 20,000 ton cruiser is coming out in the next couple of years.

我看到消息说，未来几年还会推出一款两万吨级的新型巡洋舰。

lawrenceng7971
Sohai… harrier and the howitzer is being built in the us with foreign tech… what are you proposing is having it built in Japan and Korea

别乱扯了，美军的鹞式战机、榴弹炮本身就用了不少外国技术。你还想把军舰建造都外包给日韩？

LEE-n8i
The US can't even build the simplest Constellation-class corvettes, yet it keeps launching various super-battleship programs just to please the White House. The US is increasingly resembling the Qing Dynasty government of 19th-century China, brainwashing its people into believing it's the most powerful nation, prohibiting them from accessing real foreign information, and using war, intimidation, and deception instead of diplomacy to solve problems. The country appears powerful, but it's actually utterly corrupt, yet no one dares to speak out for fear of retaliation from the White House

美国连结构最简单的星座级护卫舰都造不明白，却为了迎合白宫，不断上马各种超级战舰项目。如今的美国越来越像19世纪的晚清：洗脑民众自诩天下第一，封锁外界真实信息，遇事不靠外交，只会武力威慑、欺诈施压。表面看着强盛，内里腐朽不堪，众人还都怕白宫打压，不敢直言真相。

Motor-City_Ben-Diesel
The US government is ass backwards in so many ways. Corrupt as hell.

美国政府很多行事逻辑完全颠倒，腐败程度简直无可救药。

streetcop157
Largest navy… by what measure…half the tonnage…half the personnel…a quarter ( at the best estimate) of carriers. Maybe in sheer number of hulls but kee antique ships in commission and sticking machine guns on bass boats does not a navy make

号称全球第一海军，按什么标准算的？总吨位、人员规模都只有别国一半，航母数量往好了说也只占四分之一。就算舰艇总数看着多，靠老旧古董船撑场面，还给小型船只加装机枪凑数，这根本算不上真正的海军实力。

继续阅读：驱逐舰

此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 资讯 » 为何中国驱逐舰势不可挡，如何能制约它们