Trade breakthrough: US, China agree on 'framework' to ease trade tensions; 'we feel positive'

贸易突破：中美达成“框架协议”，缓解贸易紧张，“我们持积极态度”

After months of tensions and tariff battles, top officials from the United States and China announced on Tuesday that they had agreed on a “framework” to move forward on trade. Speaking after nearly 20 hours of negotiations at Lancaster House in London, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said, “We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus,” referring to the previous agreement that saw a 90-day suspension of steep tariffs on both sides.

The talks, held in a Georgian-era mansion near Buckingham Palace, mark a significant shift in tone, with Lutnick expressing optimism that disputes over critical exports like rare earths “will be resolved.” China is the world’s largest producer of rare earth elements, essential to industries from electric vehicles to defence. Beiing had imposed restrictions in April, sparking global concern. Lutnick suggested a resolution could soon follow once both presidents approve the new framework: “Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it.”

在经历数月的紧张局势和关税战后，美国与中国的高级官员于周二宣布，双方已就推进贸易谈判的“框架协议”达成一致。美国商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克（Howard Lutnick）在伦敦兰开斯特宫进行近20小时谈判后表示：“我们已达成实施日内瓦共识的框架协议。”他指的是此前双方同意暂停90天高额关税的协议。

谈判地点选在白金汉宫附近的一座格鲁吉亚时期豪宅，这标志着谈判基调的重大转变。卢特尼克对稀土等关键出口商品的争端“将得到解决”表达了乐观态度。中国是全球最大的稀土生产国，而稀土是从电动汽车到国防等多个行业的关键资源。北京曾于4月对稀土出口实施限制，引发全球关注。卢特尼克暗示，一旦两国总统批准新框架，解决方案可能很快出台：“总统批准后，我们将着手落实。”

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer confirmed that while no further meetings were scheduled, the two sides remained in frequent contact. “We feel positive about engaging with the Chinese,” he said. Meanwhile, China’s chief negotiator Li Chenggang said the delegations would return to their respective leaders with the proposal.

The current agreement builds on last month’s Geneva discussions, where both sides agreed to reduce tariffs. However, tensions remained high over US restrictions on Chinese access to semiconductor technology and China’s control over rare earth exports. President Trump had earlier said, “We are doing well with China. China’s not easy,” and spoken about the need to “open up China” to US products.

美国贸易代表贾米森·格里尔（Jamieson Greer）证实，尽管尚未安排后续会议，但双方仍保持频繁沟通。“我们对与中方的接触持积极态度，”他说。与此同时，中国首席谈判代表李成钢表示，代表团将带着提案向各自领导人汇报。

当前协议基于上月的日内瓦磋商，当时双方同意降低关税。然而，围绕美国对中国获取半导体技术的限制，以及中国对稀土出口的管控，两国紧张局势依然高企。特朗普总统此前曾表示：“我们与中国的谈判进展顺利。中国不好对付，”并谈到需要“向美国产品开放中国市场”。

以下是印度时报读者的评论：

lhr
Putin and china got trump by his infamous epstein balls.

普京和中国抓住了特朗普的痛处，就是特朗普那臭名昭著的爱泼斯坦丑闻。

Umapathy Rao Kasturi
This trade deal is more important to USA than China. After all tall claims and threats. USA will shutdown in no time without China trade.

这份贸易协议对美国比对中国更重要。毕竟说了那么多豪言壮语和威胁的话。没有和中国的贸易，美国很快就会停摆。

-

bsqdgv
MAGA forgotten .. MAS(lave)A begins with trade talks with China ..

“让美国再次伟大”被忘了……“和中国的贸易谈判开始了。

vjsbs
India should never ever Trust USA. May it be deep state-leftist-jihadi- de ocratic combine or Republican Trump, they all gang up to hit Indian interest.

印度绝不应该信任美国。无论是深层政府、左翼、圣战分子和民 主党的联合势力，还是共和党人特朗普，他们全都合伙损害印度的利益。

Ilias
Seems like rare earths were about to close down european industries in few weeks. Notice how US has been putting controls on semiconductor for 10 years against China. It has backfired abd China is making better cheaper chips about to overtake west. But west can't mine rare earths.

看起来稀土短缺，可能在几周内就让欧洲工业停产。注意美国这10年是如何对中国实施半导体管制的。结果适得其反，中国正在生产更好更便宜的芯片，即将超越西方。但西方却无法开采稀土。

Sandeep
lol china is still a decade behind the west when it comes to making semiconductors. most of the west is on 2-3 nm process and smic is still trying to hit 7 nm

哈哈，中国的半导体制造仍然落后西方十年。大部分西方企业已经采用2-3纳米工艺，而中芯国际还在努力攻克7纳米。

Ilias
They are already at 5nm and 3nm in 2026 by latest. And dumb idiot. It is taiwan which is ahead not US. US is trying to steal from Taiwan just like they stole from Japan after plaza accord. It's laughable how misinformed and jealous people.are of others success. After suking white pipi it is a shock that Chinese may get ahead and master wasn't as great so suking pipi is humiliating lolz. Moreover China has more patents and more research papers now

他们最晚到2026年就能实现5纳米和3纳米工艺。蠢货，领先的是中国台湾地区，不是美国。美国正努力窃取台湾地区的技术，就像《广场协议》后窃取日本技术一样。有些人对别人的成功既无知又嫉妒，真是可笑。以前跪舔西方的时候，现在看到中国可能超越，而他们的“主子”没那么厉害了，跪舔就变得丢人了，哈哈。而且中国现在拥有更多专利和研究论文。

Rinku Singh
Dolandji is the greatest leader world has ever seen. He has brought all the leaders of great countries on their knees. As a dear friend of Modiji,he is also friend of Bharat. Hopefully Bharat also signs the trade deal before July 7. MAGA plus MIGA = MEGA. Dolandji ki Jai!

特朗普是世界上有史以来最伟大的领导人。他让所有大国都俯首称臣。作为莫迪吉的挚友，他也是印度的朋友。希望印度也能在7月7日前签署这份贸易协议。“让美国再次伟大”加上“让印度再次伟大”等于“超级伟大”。特朗普万岁！

xxoo-lp6vc
The US tried to keep China at the bottom of the value chain, but forgot that the bottom floor of the building is the most important floor of the building.

美国想把中国困在价值链底端，却忘了大楼的底层才是最重要的根基。

tomvandenbossche4733
China holds all the cards

中国手握所有筹码。

jimmynam4261
Trump: we don’t need china, china need us

特朗普说：我们不需要中国，是中国需要我们。

lovinenglanduk
China doesn`t really need US semi conductors. What they want is for US State Secretary and Defence Secretary to tone down anti Chinese rethorics.

中国其实不需要美国半导体。他们希望美国国务卿和国防部长收敛反华言论。

eterSzeto-es6em
Can someone tell the Americans that they don't need rare earths to make cheap t-shirts please? Many thanks

有没有人能告诉美国人，做廉价T恤根本不需要稀土？多谢了。

hylimm
china doesn't need yr semiconductors!! u r screwed

中国不需要你们的半导体！你们完了！

audita
China has been quietly waging economic war on the West for decades - undercutting its industrial base, manipulating trade rules, and flooding markets with cheap, state-subsidized goods to weaken domestic industries.
This strategy has been alarmingly effective, not only because of China’s long-term planning, but also because segments of the Western elite have willingly played along - chasing profits through offshoring, market access, and political influence, even at the expense of their own nations.
Many of our political leaders lack the strategic vision - or the courage - to confront this reality.
China has no intention of stop Russia. The two regimes are aligned in their goal of dismantling Western dominance and are willing to exploit global crises to accelerate that outcome.

几十年来，中国一直在悄悄对西方发动经济战——削弱其工业基础，操控贸易规则，国家补贴的廉价商品，倾销他国市场。这策略成效惊人，不仅得益于中国的长期规划，还归功于部分西方精英甘愿配合——通过外包、市场准入和政治影响力追逐利润，哪怕以本国利益为代价。我们很多政治领导人缺乏战略眼光，或者说缺乏直面现实的勇气。中国无意阻止俄罗斯。两个国家的目标一致，就是瓦解西方主导地位，并且愿意利用全球危机来加速这一结果。

soonfoongloke4223
what if China ask to remove the "Wassenaar Agreement " between US and its allies, which delt with export control of dual used materials just like rare earth ?

要是中国要求废除美国及其盟友之间的《瓦森纳协定》呢？该协定涉及稀土等两用物资的出口管制。

minshyu
How is this negotiation different from the first Trump administration 2018 and the early Biden administration 2021, expect delegation members？

除了代表团成员，这次谈判和2018年特朗普首届政府、2021年拜登政府早期的谈判有什么区别？

gilbert643
China don't need chips anymore but lithography machine from ASML

中国不再需要芯片了，需要的是阿斯麦的光刻机。

brandenongkp
Trump has stopped bragging and started begging.

特朗普不吹牛了，开始求着人了。

samesamebutdifferent563
US - Okay, we will lift chips exports if you give us your rare earths.
China - Thanks, don't need your chips no more. You want some Huawei chips?

美国说：“这样吧，你给我们稀土，我们就解除芯片出口限制。”

中国回：“谢了，我们不需要你们的芯片了。你们要不要买一些华为芯片？”

sowhodecidedthat3924
US: Sell us your Rare Earths
China: Sell us your advanced semiconductors
US: No, they are protected by National Security as they are used in AI
China: No, they are protected by National Security as they are used in stealth fighter jets and missiles.

美国：“把稀土卖给我们。”

中国：“把先进半导体卖给我们。”

美国：“不行，这些用于人工智能，受国家安全保护。”

中国：“我们的也不行，稀土用于隐形战机和导弹，一样受国家安全保护。”

manwingchi9156
We know China going give rare earth minerals to US, but China want something in return, nothing is free

我们都知道中国会给美国稀土，但中国要回报的——没什么是白给的。

wildchildcarvings8482
Why would they want to give us anything the way we are doing "business". What kind of a tactic is disrespecting multiple countries all at once with tariffs and then expect them to bow down. It's not going well. Someone better take the keys from grandpa

我们这么搞“生意”，人家凭什么给我们东西？一边用关税得罪一堆国家，一边又想让人家低头，这算什么策略？根本行不通。最好有人把老爷子手里的钥匙拿走。

U1946
It looks like China might end up gaining even more than it did before the tariffs were introduced. If that’s the case, what was the point of imposing them in the first place? Were the economic costs and trade disruptions really worth it?

看起来中国最后得到的可能比加关税前还多。要是这样，当初加关税意义在哪？那些经济代价和贸易混乱真的值得吗？

继续阅读：中美   伦敦   贸易   稀土

此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 印度看中国 » 印媒：中美在伦敦达成“框架协议”，缓解贸易紧张关系