China is Building Two Deadly Type 095 Nuclear Attack Submarines

中国正在建造两艘致命的095型攻击核潜艇。

China is building two Type 095 nuclear attack submarines, with features such as a pumpjet propeller, multipack VLS, and the YJ-21 ballistic missiles.

中国正在建造两艘095型攻击核潜艇，其具有泵喷推进器、多联装垂直发射系统以及鹰击-21弹道导弹等特点。

以下是印度网友的评论：

Senbonzakura776
Great vid as always. Also very cool to see new subs coming out no matter who is launching them.

太棒了。不管是哪个国家在建造新潜艇，能看到新潜艇问世的感觉很酷。

kimmurphy3713
Excellent news

真是个好消息。

tonyyin8524
Maybe Type 095As will have rime-less propulsion?

也许095A型潜艇会采用无轴泵推技术呢？

gorkarullan
One area that hasn't been mentioned is the nuclear reactor. The Type 93 uses two high-pressure reactors that generate a combined output of between 160 and 180 MW. It is believed that China is launching a new generation of molten salt nuclear reactor. A few years ago, a small-scale molten salt reactor was built in China for civilian use and research. It is believed that an improved version of this reactor will be used in future aircraft carriers and very possibly in future ICBM submarines. It is possible that the new Type 95 will use at least one improved reactor, and it may be molten salt. This would give the submarine much more power generation, potentially reaching 400 MW. Although it is possible that, being a miniaturized reactor, for safety reasons, it will be kept at much lower levels... in fact, the Type 95 would only need 200 MW on average. All these additions would be a key advantage. But I love seeing the yellow brick road that Chinese development is following. It's incredible. It's quite possible that the future aircraft carrier will use two of these molten salt reactors.

有一个方面还没提到，那就是核反应堆。093型潜艇使用两台高压反应堆，总输出功率在160到180兆瓦之间。

据信，中国正在研发新一代熔盐核反应堆。几年前，中国建造了一座小型熔盐反应堆，用于民用和研究。人们认为，这种反应堆的改进版将用于未来的航空母舰，而且很可能会用于未来的洲际弹道导弹潜艇。

新型095型潜艇有可能至少使用一台改进后的反应堆，且可能是熔盐反应堆。这将为潜艇提供更多的发电量，有可能达到400兆瓦。

不过，由于它是小型化反应堆，出于安全考虑，其功率可能会保持在低得多的水平

实际上，095型潜艇平均只需要200兆瓦的功率。所有这些改进都将是关键优势。但我喜欢看到中国沿着发展的“黄砖路”前行，这太不可思议了。

未来的航空母舰很有可能会使用两台这种熔盐反应堆。

kwethew8562
China should build 100 of these submarines by 2049.

到2049年，中国应该建造100艘这样的潜艇。

tyme5837
all diesel-powered submarines can be converted to nuclear-powered submarines by incorporating an external nuclear reactor pod behind the conning tower or under its belly

所有的柴电动力潜艇都可以通过在指挥塔后面或艇腹下方安装一个外部核反应堆舱，改装成核动力潜艇。

Amidat
there is no reason for that. diesel electrics are more stealthy than larger and louder nuclear powered subs. they are also much less expensive to maintain. nuclear subs are for the open ocean where speed and endurance matters most. China (like Russia) uses most of its subs for coastal defense primarily.

没必要那么做。柴电潜艇比体积更大、噪音更大的核潜艇更具隐身性。而且它们的维护成本也低得多。核潜艇适用于公海，在那里速度和续航能力最为重要。中国和俄罗斯的潜艇大多主要用于沿海防御。

SlavaRossii-d5w
The future of naval warfare revolves around unmanned submersible and semisubmersible vehicles that will be deployed in massive numbers. I would argue that these are far more important than SSNs, and I hope China has some advanced and mature projects in that field as well.

未来海战的关键在于大量部署无人潜水器和半潜式载具。我认为，这些比攻击型核潜艇重要得多，我也希望中国在这一领域也有一些先进且成熟的项目。

shmeckle666
SSNs, yeah maybe but there will still be a requirement for SSNs for long endurance/range interdiction. As for SSBNs, still the most survivable nuclear deterrent asset.

攻击型核潜艇嘛，也许是没那么重要，但对长航时、远程拦截任务来说，仍然需要攻击型核潜艇。至于战略导弹核潜艇，它依旧是最具生存能力的核威慑力量。

Amidat
unmanned drones weather in the air or otherwise can't carry the weapons loads than manned vehicles can. China has plenty of underwater drones - but that can't win a war. That is seen in the current Russia/Ukraine fight. Drones can kill and maim - but they can't destroy another military

无论是空中的还是其他类型的无人机，其武器载荷都比不上有人驾驶的载具。

中国有很多水下无人机，但这并不能赢得一场战争。

这一点从当前的俄乌冲突中就能看出来。

无人机可以造成杀伤，但它们无法消灭一支军队。

gelinrefira
I doubt the Type 095 will not have comparable number of VLS than either the Virginia or Kazan. It will make no sense for China to invest so heavily into this platform only to have it carry far fewer missiles where firepower is one of the most important trait of a nuclear attack submarine.

我怀疑095型潜艇的垂直发射系统数量不会比“弗吉尼亚”级或“喀山”号少。中国如果在这个平台上投入大量资金，携带的导弹数量却少得多，这是说不通的，毕竟火力是攻击型核潜艇最重要的特性之一。

rogerlenton3335
It all comes down to how they intend to deploy it, i.e., will it spend most of its time hunting enemy fleets or escorting PLAN aircraft carriers?

这一切都取决于他们打算如何部署潜艇，也就是说，它大部分时间是用于猎杀敌方舰队，还是用于为中国人民解放军海军的航空母舰护航呢？

stc2828
095 with yj21 can destroy ships sitting in docks all the way back in US main land, it is going to be crazy

配备鹰击-21的095型潜艇能够摧毁远在美国本土港口内的船只，这可太厉害了。

christopherguerrero4685
No it cant

不，它做不到。

iwanstillisntacountry
Tell your sailors to close their hatches

告诉你的水手们把舱门关上。

douginorlando6260
I expect next generation nuke subs to include the capability to charge the batteries of non nuke subs and drone subs while submerged.

我期望下一代核潜艇具备在水下为非核潜艇和无人潜艇的电池充电的能力。

douginorlando6260
Also I expect another class of next generation non nuke subs and drone subs designed to remain submerged while recharging from surface ships (even from fishing boats). This includes some surface ships designed with a docking port underneath the hull where subs can lock on, open the hatch and transfer supplies and people.

我还期望有另一类下一代非核潜艇和无人潜艇，它们被设计成能在从水面舰艇（甚至渔船）充电时仍保持在水下。这包括一些水面舰艇，其船体下方设计有对接端口，潜艇可以锁定端口，打开舱口，转移物资和人员。

douginorlando6260
Planners should expect a next generation nuke sub to deploy with 2 non nuke subs that can travel as a pack submerged to anywhere. The 2 non nuke subs equipped with minimal systems because they rely on the nuke sub and are just “missile trucks”, they surface and each launch hundreds of subsonic cruise missiles to sink all commercial ship within 1000 km

规划者应该设想下一代核潜艇在部署时，能携带两艘非核潜艇，它们可以作为一个编队在水下航行到任何地方。这两艘非核潜艇配备的系统较少，只是“导弹运载车”。它们浮出水面后，各自发射数百枚亚声速巡航导弹，击沉1000公里范围内的所有商船。

gorkarullan
The principle of drones is that they are disposable. It makes no sense to recharge a drone, and even less so to reduce the effectiveness of the drone and submarine to carry out recharging operations… These capabilities can be criticized… but I highly doubt they will be implemented. Furthermore, these maneuvers have an excessively high operational cost. What is being done now are drones that can recharge themselves, with the rolling of waves or sunlight.

无人机的设计理念就是一次性的。给无人机充电没有意义，更不用说为了进行充电操作而降低无人机和潜艇的效能了。这些能力是值得商榷的。但我非常怀疑它们能否得以实现。此外，这些操作的运营成本过高。现在正在研发的是能利用海浪起伏或太阳能自行充电的无人机。

ifefun1987
12 metre beam will make it huge. over 15000 ton?

12米的艇宽，得很大。排水量会超过15000吨吗？

Bob-wh6qr
Submarines are crucial. I don't believe aircraft carriers are survivable in modern naval warfare.

潜艇至关重要。我认为在现代海战中，航空母舰难以存活下来。

Amidat
they all have to work together in a navy... no system is survivable by itself. subs are only useful when hidden. once they give themselves away -- when fighting a peer -- they become at a disadvantage if they are out by themselves

在海军中，所有装备都必须协同作战。没有哪种装备系统能独自存活下来。潜艇只有在隐蔽状态下才有用。一旦它们暴露了自己——尤其是在与实力相当的对手作战时——如果单独行动，就会处于劣势。

继续阅读：核潜艇   导弹

此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 大国 » 中国正在建造两艘强大的095型攻击核潜艇，搭载鹰击21弹道导弹