Quora网站读者评论：

Padmanabhan Venkatesan, I have lived in Andhra Pradesh. I loved the people.
Briton and many other European countries may have achieved a lot. But India’s diversity and meager natural resources did not stop it from progressing peacefully.Greatness of people of a nation reflects in their freedom from fear of it’s own rulers or from external aggression. A nation which never posed any threat to any nation. A nation which extends it’s hands for friendship even to their enemies can not be compared with any nation including China.

英国和许多其他欧洲国家也许取得了很大的成就，但印度的多样性和贫乏的自然资源并没有阻止它和平发展。一个国家人民的伟大体现在他们不畏惧自己的统治者或不受外来侵略。一个从未对任何国家构成威胁的国家，一个向敌人伸出友谊之手的国家是不该和包括中国在内的任何国家相提并论的。

Anthony Collingwood, studied at Western Sydney University
No India far exceeds China….
Better cricket team
Has a functioning de ocracy

Chinese food is much better in India…i know its weird but true
Bollywood
Modi
Indian has living gods ……Priyanka Chopra…

不，印度远远超过中国....
板球队更厉害
民诸政权正常运转

印度的中国菜更好吃……我知道这很奇怪，但是真的
宝莱坞
莫迪
印度人还有活生生的神……普里扬卡·乔普拉……

Sudheer Che, Traveler
I visited south east China which is known to be less developed, but in comparison to India it is much developed. I personally feel India is still a develo country where as China is developed, so no point to compare development and GDP. We Indians consider to compete and compare with China, but always forget to acknowledge they are way ahead of us in all sectors. Maybe in near future we can compare in terms of population, but remember China is a big country and population density still be less than India.

我去过中国的东南部，众所周知那里是欠发达的，但与印度相比，它还是更为发达。我个人认为印度仍然是一个发展中国家，中国是发达国家，所以没有必要进行比较。我们印度人想和中国竞争和比较，但总是忘记承认他们在所有领域都远远领先我们。也许在不久的将来，我们可以在人口方面PK他们，但请记住，中国是一个大国，人口密度仍然低于印度。

Srikanth Iyengar, B Tech from National Institute of Technology, Rourkela (1988)
Indians tend to ignore the supremacy of China. The fact remains, technologically, China is way ahead of India. But the best bet of India is India has Narendra Modi on their side which will make all the difference in the next 10 years. I am conveniently assuming that Narendra Modi will remain the PM of India for the next 7 years. India will be very different in the next decade and will leave China and Europe behind

印度人往往忽视中国的霸权。从技术上讲，中国仍然遥遥领先印度。但印度最好的赌注是印度有纳伦德拉·莫迪站在他们一边，这将在未来10年里改变一切。我想当然地认为纳伦德拉·莫迪将在未来7年继续担任印度总理。10年后，印度将非常不同，将把中国和欧洲甩在身后。

来源：三泰虎 https://www.santaihu.com/45771.html 译者：Joyceliu

外文链接：https://www.quora.com/Is-India-still-comparable-with-China

Rahul Shrivastava, Joint Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs of India
India is not comparable to any country. India is unique.
Where would you find this?

印度不能拿来与任何国家作对比。印度是独一无二的。
你在哪里能找到这个?

Deepak S Fernandes, Lived in Bahrain, India, UK, US, Poland, Hong Kong and Belgium
India is comparable to China only for:
Population size and growth
How two countries with large populations manage this

印度只有在以下方面可以与中国相提并论:
人口规模和增长
两个人口众多的国家该如何应对

Economically they are not comparable — China is way ahead. India may catch up, China may stumble but both have utterly different systems, different institutions, different inter-region growth, different market dynamics. You cannot compare the two. India is more comparable to an in-between point between the EU and the USA in terms of regional dynamics and a common market. China is centralized.

在经济上，它们无法相提并论——中国遥遥领先。印度可能会迎头赶上，中国可能会步履蹒跚，但两国都有完全不同的体系、不同的制度、不同的地区间增长、不同的市场动态。你文本无法比较。就区域动态和共同市场而言，印度更像是欧盟和美国之间的中间点。中国则是中央。

Politically they are not comparable - India is a firm de ocracy, China is not
Socially they are not comparable - due to India’s inclusive political institutions, the social cultures are different — case in point, Hong Kong socially is quite different from the mainland.
Culturally they are not comparable - India is dharmic based, China is confucian based (yes, yes it adopted Buddhism, but the buddhism there is heavily influenced by china’s past)

在政治上，它们是不可比拟的——印度是一个坚定的民诸国家，而中国不是
在社会层面上，它们没有可比性——由于印度包容的政治体制，社会文化也不同——举例来说，香港在社会层面上与内地就有很大不同。
在文化上，它们也是没有可比性的——印度以达摩为基础，中国以儒家为基础(是的，没错，它采用了佛教，但中国的佛教深受中国历史的影响)

Anupam Kumar, Founder at The Winner (2015-present)
Of course, still India is comparable with China in most of the aspects :
India is ruled by a Democratic Party while China is ruled by Cummunist Party which is far better governance.
India has youth population (50% of its population below the age of 25 and more than 65% below the age of 35) more than that of China.
GDP Growth Rate of India (7.1 %) is faster than China (6.7 %) [1].
Tax to GDP Ratio of China (28.1 %) is higher than India (17.7 %

当然，印度在很多方面都可以和中国比一比:
印度是由民诸党统治的，而中国是由统治的，后者的治理水平要高得多。
印度的年轻人(年龄在25岁以下的占50%，35岁以下的占65%以上)比中国多。
印度的GDP增长率(7.1%)高于中国(6.7%)。
中国的税收占GDP的比例(28.1%)高于印度(17.7%)

Prabhat Kumar, works at The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ
I have seen china when I was very small. I was three when I went to china and was 11 when we returned to India. Now I do not remember much but what I do remember is the drab co unist type apartments in the heart of Beiing and wide - very wide roads with everybody on cycles.
The roads were well maintained and had no craters. but the people had no cars and only uniform type of clothing to wear . This was in 1970s.
Any repair work to be done to roads and bingo there will be machines in the evening and by morning a brand new spanking stretch would be ready. there was order and discipline and planning .
Now china is 40 years ahead from that stage and has progressed much ahead . India on the other hand is still mired in petty politics with corruption all around.

我在很小的时候就见识过中国。我去中国时三岁，回到印度时11岁。现在我不太记得了，但我记得当时北京中心地带的那种单调的公寓，还有宽阔的马路，每个人都骑着自行车。
道路维护良好，没有坑洞。但是人们没有汽车，服装样式很单一。当时是1970年代。
任何道路维修工作都在晚上进行，早上起来就是全新的景象。有秩序，有纪律，有计划。
中国在这一阶段已经领先了40年，取得了长足的进步。而另一方面，印度仍然深陷腐败的政治泥潭。

Ashok Mundhada, works at Prof. Ram Meghe Institude of Technology & Research, Badnera
No. An emphatic no! China is now the world’s second biggest economy & the third biggest military power. It’s infrastructural development is to be seen to be believed. Wherever you go, you find cranes & more cranes everywhere. China is now a manufacturing giant. It consumes almost 50% of all the metals consumed by the world (like steel, aluminium, copper, zinc). China is now an out & out capitalistic country under the garb of co sm. China compares itself with US, Europe & Japan. In India, lately the mindset is changing to whatever the Islamic countries (like Pakistan & Iran) can do, we can do worse.

不。大写的不。中国现在是世界第二大经济体和第三大军事强国。它的基础设施建设是有目共睹的。无论你走到哪里，你都能看到吊车，到处都是。中国现在是制造业巨头。它几乎消耗了全世界所有金属的50%(如钢铁、铝、铜、锌)。中国将自己与美国、欧洲和日本进行比较。在印度，最近的思维模式正在改变，不管ysl国家(比如巴基斯坦和伊朗)能做什么，我们都能做得更糟。

Umair Usman, Traveled to India for business
I am from Pakistan. I have visited China as well as India.
In the 80s, some of my family had visited China. It was big but nothing like Pakistan where there is a much deep rooted capitalist culture. However, presently there is no comparison.
With India, I feel it is difficult to compare because their aims, governance and economic models are so damn different.
What is apparent about China relative to India is their long term thinking and incredible governance. China’s Basic economic goals, stretch out to 2070 (or somewhere close) and their party is frankly a group of highly qualified technocrats with a lot of power.
I do not believe it is fair to compare them both.

我来自巴基斯坦。我访问过中国和印度。
在80年代，我的家人去过中国。中国很大，但不像巴基斯坦那样有着根深蒂固的zb主义文化。不过现在都一样了。
我觉得很难把中国和印度进行比较，因为它们的目标、治理和经济模式截然不同。
中国相对于印度的明显特征是他们的长期思维和难以置信的治理水平。中国的基本经济目标已制定到2070年(或接近2070年)，坦率地说，他们的党是一群拥有强大权力的高素质技术官僚。
我认为把这两者进行比较是不公平的。

Siddharth Pathak, Hindi Chini bhai bhai, 中印兄弟
Both are extraordinarily egotistical, with one of the longest historiography to back it up.
Both possess 35% of the world's population.
Both were treated (and still are) by the colonial powers that would be.
Both are becoming increasingly assertive in forcing the world structure to become less dominated by the Western powers.
Both have been playing the empire game long before the current Empires were even formed as identities (Qin and Maurya dynasties united China and India into gigantic Empires during 300-200 AD).
China and India are comparable not because both share some sort of a similar affinity, but in terms of their aversion to the current structure of the world.

两者都是非常自负的，都有悠远的历史。
两国都拥有世界35%的人口。
这两个国家都曾(现在依然)受到殖民列强的对待。
在使世界摆脱由西方列强主导的格局方面，两国都变得越来越自信。
早在秦始皇和孔雀王朝建立之前(秦始皇和孔雀王朝在公元300-200年间将中国和印度统一为庞大的帝国)，他们就已经建立起了帝国。
中国和印度具有可比性，并不是因为两者有某种相似之处，而是因为它们对当今世界格局的厌恶。

Abhinav Goswami
Yes. Still comparable in a few ways. Not in each and every manner.
The huge amount of population is common to both nations; it can be of a huge assistance in nation building if channelized correctly which China has done better than India. But its not all rosy for China too. China has faced criticism for Tib, its apparent support to Pakistan and N.Korea and the recent bullying in case of South China Sea. It has its internal problems too like Hong Kong. India too has its own set of problems like casteism, com-nalism, corruption, policy implementation delays, etc.

是的。在一些方面仍然具有可比性。但并非所有领域都如此。
庞大的人口数量是两有的特征；如果正确地利用渠道，这对国家建设可能是一个巨大的帮助，而中国比印度做得更好。但对中国来说，也不全是乐观的。中国因xz问题而受到批评，中国显然支持巴基斯坦和联合国，最近在南中国海还发生了欺凌事件。中国也存在内部问题，比如香港。印度也有自己的问题，比如种姓制度、腐败、政策执行延迟等等。

What makes it different than India is broadly in one way (apart from type of Government) : Industrial Might.
China is a huge industrial giant, way too strong and capable from any stretch of imagination. Be it defense or any industrial product, they have the capacity to quickly produce in large numbers. It is a key strength of their economy and the same resources can be diverted in event of a war. This makes it much different and may I add, stronger, than India. True, there are human right violations, but we are not that disciplined either. Hence comparison is difficult and not worth it. We have to accept that China is much stronger nation with strong capacity in few domains. The best example : High speed train network and defense. We are still discussing high speed rail and China probably has one of the largest high speed rail network in the world (individual nation-wise). Whether this high speed rail network was correct decision or not is another question. Next, defense. From rumored copy of original designs to new stealth fighter jets which are recently inducted into China’s AirForce. China has matured for new weapons development and coupled with their industrial force, they have a significant advantage over India.

它与印度的不同之处在于(除了政府类型之外)：工业力量。
中国是一个庞大的工业巨人，太强大了，超出我们的想象力。无论是国防还是任何工业产品，他们都有能力迅速大批量生产。这是他们经济的关键力量，如果发生战争，资源也同样可以转移。这使它与印度大不相同，请允许我补充一句，比印度更强大。的确，中国存在侵犯人*的行为，但我们也没好到哪儿去。因此，做比较很难，也不值得。我们必须承认，中国是一个在少数领域实力强大得多的国家。最好的例子：高铁网络和国防。我们仍在讨论高速铁路，中国或许已经拥有了世界上最大的高铁网之一(就个人看来)。至于这条高铁网的决定是否正确，则是另一个问题了。接下来，国防。从传闻的山寨原创设计到最近加入中国空军的新型隐形战斗机。中国在新武器开发方面已经成熟，再加上其工业力量，它们对印度具有显著优势。

Neena Kumtakar, domain investor, engineer
At least the indian and chinese internet sector cannot be compared as some of the top officials in India are shameless frauds and liars.
India's largest female domain investor, a google competitor, finds that NTRO, CBI and the indian government is allegedly falsely claiming that 10 lazy greedy mediocre inexperienced goan call girls, cheater housewives and other fraud women who have not invested any money online or done any work online, own her domain names, have her impressive resume, investment to get all these fraud women lucrative R&AW/CBI/indian intelligence jobs at the expense of the real domain investor who is getting nothing, despite paying all the expenses

至少印度和中国的互联网行业无法相提并论，因为印度的某些高级官员是无耻的骗子。
印度最大的女性域名投资者,谷歌的竞争对手,发现NTRO,CBI和印度政府涉嫌虚假声称10懒惰贪婪平庸的没有经验的果阿人召唤应召女郎，家庭主妇骗子和其他女骗子没有在网上投入任何钱，或在线做过做任何工作，却拥有自己的域名空间，上面有令人印象深刻的简历，这些女骗子让真正的域名投资者除了要为此多掏腰包外，一无所获。

Mithileshwar Thakur, Additional Director General at Government of India
Not at all. India has a long way to go . Data speaks for itself.
General data on economy :
Chinese economy is growing at extraordinary pace during last two decades which resulted in China emerging as the second largest economy of the world . China's GDP is now 5 times bigger than India's , exports is 7 times more than India's and forex reserve 10 times bigger than India's.
It is much easier for India to achieve the same growth rate as China as it has much smaller base compared to the land of the dragon.

完全无法相提并论。印度还有很长的路要走。数据本身就说明了这一点。
综合经济数据:
中国经济在过去20年以惊人的速度增长，使中国一跃成为世界第二大经济体。中国的GDP是印度的5倍，出口额是印度的7倍，外汇储备是印度的10倍。
对印度来说，实现与中国同样的增长率要容易得多，因为与中国相比，印度的基数要小得多。

China is an enigma . China is a phenomenon the world is watching with awe and admiration. Chinese fairytale is powered by its “ export-led-growth model ” and backed by its superlative infrastructure, mass production , high productivity level , economy of scale, strategic marketing and above all unbeatable business acumen. The comparative cost advantage enjoyed by Chinese goods help them penetrate into all leading markets of the world. China is a classic case study. It continues to defy the conventional wisdom of economics. World is waiting with bated breath for Chinese bubble to burst but China is going from strength to strength .

中国是个谜。中国是全世界怀着敬畏和钦佩之情注视着的一个现象。中国童话以其“出口导向型增长模式”为动力，以其一流的基础设施、大规模生产、高生产率水平、规模经济、战略营销以及最重要的商业头脑为后盾。中国商品所享有的相对成本优势帮助它们渗透到世界所有主要市场。中国是一个典型的例子。它继续挑战经济学的传统智慧。世界正屏息以待中国泡沫的破灭，但中国正变得越来越强大。

China now is quite a force to reckon with. Its importance can be gauged by the fact that most of recent trade barriers and tariff hike introduced by the Trump administration is essentially directed at China.

中国现在是一股不可忽视的力量。特朗普政府最近提出的大多数贸易壁垒和关税上调基本上都是针对中国的，这一事实可以衡量其重要性。

A quick comparison between India & China on the basis of vital economic parameters :
Manufacturing :
China is “ factory of the world ”whereas our manufacturing share in GDP has plateaued over the years . Mfg sector in India is going through tough times, thanks to dumped imports of all kinds of goods from China.
Trump's America is deeply disturbed and threatened at the loss of jobs and adverse impact on its manufacturing by Chinese imports into USA. India also finds itself in similar situation . In fact , the crisis in Indian manufacturing is even more serious. So , India is a victim whereas China is clearly an aggressor.

根据重要经济参数快速比较印度和中国:
制造业:
中国是“世界工厂”，而我们的制造业占GDP的份额多年来一直保持稳定。由于从中国倾销进口的各种商品，印度制造业正经历艰难的时期。
特朗普领导下的美国对中国从美国进口对其制造业造成的失业和不利影响深感不安和威胁。印度也发现自己处于类似的境地。事实上，印度制造业的危机更为严重。因此，印度是受害者，而中国显然是侵略者。

Infrastructure:
Chinese infrastructure is comparable to the best in the world . Their speed of project execution is amazing . We need to learn a lot from them.
China's “ One belt One road ” project is going to be a mega game changer and is aimed at establishing Chinese hegemony in South Asian region.

基础设施:
中国的基础设施可算世界一流。他们的项目执行速度非常惊人。我们需要从他们身上学习的东西很多。
中国的“一带一路”将成为一个宏大的秩序重塑者，旨在建立中国在南亚地区的霸权。

ICT
China has created a virtual alternative world of its own . Baidu for Google, V Chat for WhatsApp, Alibaba for Amazon et al . All top hackers are of Chinese origin whereas we struggle to protect even our most sensitive web servers . We are nowhere near them . Our Flipkart & Snapdeal too has substantial foreign equity in it. China & USA are bent upon obliterating Indian digital supremacy. China's prowess in hardware is in any case proven & undisputed. India will need to really gear up to match China in ICT

信息通信技术
中国创造了自己的虚拟世界。百度对标谷歌，微信对标WhatsApp，阿里巴巴对标亚马逊等。所有顶级黑客都来自中国，而我们却在努力保护我们最敏感的网络服务器。我们离他们还差得远着呢。我们的Flipkart & Snapdeal也有大量外资参与。中国和美国正致力于消灭印度的电子产业霸业。无论如何，中国在硬件方面的实力是毋庸置疑的。印度需要在信息通信技术方面真正赶超中国

R & D :
Indian investment in R& D is 1/5th of China . In matters of intellectual property too China has surged far far ahead. Its patent filing is approx 70 times more than that of India. The number of scientists per million population is also nearly 5 times that of India

研发:
印度在研发方面的投资占中国的五分之一。在知识产权方面，中国也遥遥领先。它的专利申请数量大约是印度的70倍。每百万人口中科学家的数量几乎是印度的5倍

Participation in Global Value Chain :
China is invariably the part of GVC for most of the electronic & high-tech products ( example : I Phone design is conceived & prototype made in USA , critical components manufactured in Korea and Taiwan but finally assembled in China ) .
India's participation in GVC is impeded by the poor trade infrastructure, inherent cost disabilities & lack of ease in doing business ( recent rapid strides & progress notwithstanding)

全球价值链的参与度:
大多数电子和高科技产品都是在中国大陆生产的(例如:I Phone设计是在美国构思和制作的原型，关键部件在韩国和台湾制造，最后在中国组装)。
印度在全球价值链中的参与度受到了贸易基础设施落后、固有成本缺陷和经商困难等因素的阻碍(尽管最近取得了长足进步)