The Comparison of Apache vs Indian built LCH. who wins ?
“阿帕奇” vs 印度本土轻型战斗直升机（LCH），哪个赢？
The two helicopter which known for its significant multifunction's capacity that makes it more deadly superior for war. Apache was introduced in the year 1981 in US air force whereas LCH was made its first flight on 2010. for more info watch video do let us know your thoughts about both helicopters.
FUN FACT : INDIA GOT BOTH OF THEM.
deepak singh rajawat
Apache indeed a beast and awesome capabilities but in mountain warfare at high altitude LCH would perform better
Kaustabh Singha Roy
LCH is designed for high mountains and it is a king there definitely on pns apache excel
Wow very impressive respect India from Somalia
The only reason India made LCH because Indian needs to mon or over the Himyas and LCH can fly over peaks of the top mountains but Apache cant do that at all.
Lch is light heli and apache is medium heli
Lch is light attack heli and Apache is medium. LCH was designed to fight in the mighty himyas where the average peak height is around 6.5 km.
Both have a different design due to the difference between the tasks they are meant for. The Apache was designed as a heavy survivable helicopter to stem the red hordes on the pns of Europe. The LCH as a light attack and reconnaissance helicopter for high altitude and hot/humid conditions.
LCH is made for high altitude Himyan warfare......Apache is heavy attack helicopter
Just look at the price difference Apach is 2.5 times costlier. Im sure LCH can be fitted with various bombs and guns. LCH also flies higher and further. Not much in the speed department just a little faster is the Apache. I believe the LCH wins purely because of its flight ceiling and range and cost.
This is just an example of growing up of "Atmanirbhar Bharat", Jai hind jai bharat..........
Apache is a warthog on the battlefield but lch is designed to attack on mountains as in 1999 kargil war india realised that they require a attack helicopter for such areas.
Both play different roles
Both are different and both are just
Dude Apache is heavier and it is a Medium weight heavy support helicopter while LCH is a lightweight and support helicopter designed considering the Himyan terrain in consideration.
Indian go nment should push for lch, it is inhouse and highly capable machine.
LCH primarily is developed for high altitude missions. You can call it china centric. As tensions fr between both countries, LCH is becoming more relevant. Galwan clash has changed everything.
Lch is lighter than apache
That's why it's called lch
Both are different category helicopter, both are designed for totally different type of warfare..
Nobody In here
The two helicopters are different in sizes, power, weight capabilities, technology, radars, won payloads and meant for different missions. There's absolutely no comparison between them and India buying both of them is meant to compliment each other NOT to replace either
Can't compare- LCH is designed spcifically for high altitude mountain warefare
Though the Apache may outperform the LCH, the LCH gives far greater bang for the buck than the Apache.
Kee in view the prices, LCH is clearly ahead!
Having both is an advantage as they can be used depending on the requirement needed.
Two are different class no comparison lch is best in mountanious hilly terrain
I am impressed by lch
The real test would be in Ladakh and the Himyas in the war ag inst China, very proud of LCH
SANTOSH KUMAR SAHOO
Apache is heavyweight and LCH is lightweight, maintainance cost is very high in case of Apache, while LCH can do the same that an Apache can do with a low budget and low maintainance. LCH is designed for high altitude warfare in Himyan region, in high altitude war Apache is less effective because of it's weight.
I could never imagine a situation where the apache and LCH are ag inst each other. I hope for a strong alliance between the US and India
Nowadays Apaches are exclusive used by Talibans in Afghanistan.
Apache still looks cool