“阿耳忒弥斯-1”登月火箭发射两次推迟

Failed moon launches expose NASA

登月火箭发射失败揭穿了NASA

NASA had to postpone the launch of Artemis-1 lunar mission twice over fuel leakage issues. What do the delays say about America's sliding space supremacy?

由于燃料泄漏问题，NASA不得不两次推迟“阿耳忒弥斯-1”登月火箭的发射。美国太空霸主地位的式微说明了什么?

以下是印度网民的评论：

localHazzard

The way I see it this actually shows that NASA knows what they're doing and are being professional. When launching a multimillion dollar rocket with a thousand ways for it to go wrong you definitely want to take your time to make sure everything goes right. This prudence helps keep funds, resources, and even lives from being wasted by botched launches.

在我看来，这实际上表明NASA知道他们在做什么，而且是专业的。发射一个耗资数百万美元的火箭，有一千种可能出错的方式，你肯定要花时间来确保万无一失。

shafthespaceegg

That’s totally normal for rocket launches to get delayed there’s a lot that can go wrong, the Soviets used to just launch their rockets anyway and then they’d blow up and they’d try and look at the debris to figure out what went wrong

火箭发射延迟是很正常的，有很多地方可能出错，苏联人过去发射火箭，然后它经常爆炸，他们会通过查看碎片来找出出错的地方

Jay

Being an Indian, I have deep respect for your reports, so do for the contributions NASA had done to the mankind. Failure of rocket launches are not new, and it happened to launches across the globe, including those in India. A failure shouldn’t deter an agency like NASA from pursuing its mission. None of us are competent enough to judge if the launch is wasteful. There could well be a mission behind it, like testing a new piece of technology, or testing a new scientific theory etc.

对NASA为人类做出的贡献也深表敬意。火箭发射失败并不新鲜，全球各地的发射都发生过失败，包括印度的火箭发射。

失败不能阻止NASA这样的机构履行使命。

我们没有人有足够的能力去判断这次发射是否白费了。它背后很可能有一个任务，比如测试一项新技术，或测试一种新的科学理论等

Noire Kuroraigami

Im happy they take their time.

We don't need another Rocket Disaster from oversight. That last one killed the space race

我很高兴他们不着急发射。我们不需要再来一次火箭灾难，上一次毁了太空竞赛

Brian Hind

Artemis is an enhanced vehicle, & problems are to be expected, which is why launches are cancelled until

the engineers are satisfied that all is well. Aircraft departures are routinely cancelled because of problems discovered before takeoff, & I don't hear suggestions to junk the airplane because of these problems.

“阿耳特弥斯”是一种增强型运载火箭，问题是可预见的。所以发射被取消，等工程师们对一切都很满意为止才能发射。

飞机通常会因为起飞前发现的问题而取消起飞，我没有听到因为这些问题而提出报废飞机。

No Nonsense Dragon

Don't worry NASA will get it right, they always do.

别担心，NASA会做到的，他们总能成功。

Roy Hamill

There is no failure. The 60s NASA rushed and took risks that cost money and lives.

不算失败。60年代，NASA仓促行事，冒着损失金钱和生命的风险。

Simon Sez

As of March 2021, NASA in-flight accidents have killed 15 astronauts.

In each case the entire crew was killed.

The current statistical fatality rate is 3.2 percent.

截至2021年3月，NASA的飞行事故已经造成15名宇航员死亡。

在一次事故中，整个机组都遇难了。目前的统计死亡率为3.2%。

My Space

NASA has done very well so far in all their explorations,

lets not get carried away because of some set backs.

到目前为止，NASA在所有探索中都做得很好，

我们不要因为一些挫折而失去理智。

tod jones

They should have used the 1969 technology that never failed in several moon landings. Perfect performance without a flaw, but that technology was "lost" according to NASA.

他们应该使用1969年的技术，这种技术在几次登月中从未失败过。性能完美没有任何缺陷，但根据NASA的说法，这项技术“丢失”了。

It is baffling to see that they sent a manned mission to the moon in 1969 before computers.

But with all the modern technologies at their disposal, they are not able to send unmanned missions to moon

1969年，在计算机问世之前，他们就完成了载人登月任务，真是令人费解啊。

凭借他们掌握的所有现代技术，他们现在向月球发射没有载人的火箭都步履维艰

Tyquon Jackson

I don't understand why she has so much to say about NASA but didn't India also fail to put satellites in orbit last month?

为什么这么说NASA，印度上个月不是也没能把卫星送入轨道吗?

Joshua Cherian

NASA has done spectacular works for space and science... But sometimes mishaps happen..But keep going ahead NASA, all the best

NASA在太空和科学领域完成了很多了不起的工作，但有时会发生意外，请再接再厉，NASA，祝一切顺利

$kyRider

I don’t see a rocket burn into rubble, I don’t see failure.

我没看到火箭烧成瓦砾，这不算失败。

Vikas Ananda

Comeon guys! It's a test mission.

好啦，伙计们

这是一个测试任务。

Andrew

I would say say a failure would not recognizing the issue and going passed “GO” that could be a much bigger problem than a setback for launch.

我想说的是，如果没有发现问题，发射出去了，可能会发生比这更严重的问题。

Kiril Karaatanasov

I too am not sure why NASA uses its own rockets instead of SpaceX to launch these missions.

为什么NASA要用自己的火箭，不用SpaceX的火箭？

S Y

What does it say about NASA? NASA is too way ahead of any organizations, that India can only dream about. A small set back is just a learning curve. When India can achieve anything remotely closed to what NASA had then it can toot its pipe.

NASA遥遥领先于其他组织，这是印度只能梦想的。一次小小的挫折只是一条学习曲线。当印度能够取得NASA的成就时，它就可以吹了。

henequen

In August 2021, the launch of GISAT-1, an earth observation satellite atop the GSLV Mk 2 rocket, failed just 350 seconds after liftoff

2021年8月，搭载在GSLV Mk 2火箭上的地球观测卫星GISAT-1在升空350秒后失败

noopur saxena

This doesn't prove anything those who try who fail, those never try never fails.

Kudos to all scientific community.

这并不能证明什么，那些尝试的人失败了，那些从不尝试的人永远不会失败。

向科学界致敬。

Cray Z. Diamond

I actually have to say: with all these other rockets in the world that have been blowing up on the launch pad. I think this kind of shows NASA's expertise. They've learned to detect all this stuff before it blows up.

世界上有那么多火箭在发射台上爆炸。我认为这恰恰说明了NASA很专业，他们在爆炸前发现问题。

ELCARLOS H

Ok let me understand something very fishing here , in 1972 they went to the moon so today almost 50 years ago can not go to the moon so the old rocket is better then today's rocket

1972年他们登上了月球。大约50年后的今天他们去不了月球，所以以前的火箭比今天的火箭更好？

Deepali Parab

Maybe they found some resources on moon which are rare and useful, plus it is easier to ferry stuff from moon then anywhere elsewhere in space.

也许他们在月球上发现了一些稀有资源，从月球运东西回来比从太空其他地方更容易。

Fred Mensah

Launching rockets is not like starting ur private car and moving it. It's a high risk venture and if u want to be safe, this is how to do it.

发射火箭不像启动私家车然后开出去那么容易。这是高风险的尝试，如果你想要保证安全，就该怎么做。

I Mathew

Astronauts going on manned missions should take a big life insurance before getting on rockets built by NASA.

执行载人任务的宇航员在登上NASA制造的火箭之前应该买一份巨额人寿保险。

Make Up Professional

Now it makes sense why India never have sent a man to the Moon yet.