三泰虎

印度最高法院:没有证据证明2002年古吉拉特邦的骚乱是有预谋的,时任首席部长的莫迪是清白的

 SC: No evidence to prove 2002 Gujarat riots pre-planned, situation overran admin

印度最高法院:没有证据证明2002年古吉拉特邦的骚乱是有预谋的,当时的局势超出了控制范围

NEW DELHI: Upholding the trial court and high court's order to give a clean chit to then CM Narendra Modi in 2002 Gujarat riots, the Supreme Court said that there was no evidence to prove the allegations that the Godhra in dent and the subsequent violence was pre-planned.

新德里:印度最高法院支持初审法院和高等法院对2002年古吉拉特邦骚乱时任首席部长纳伦德拉·莫迪清白的判决,称没有证据证明哥德拉事件和随后的暴力事件是有预谋的。

9d9e0d8fly1h3lhno8dspj20j30alq4a.jpg

A bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and C T Ravikumar rejected the submission regarding build-up of communal mobilisations and stockpiling of wons, arms and ammunition even before the Godhra episode and said that it is devoid of merits as revealed by extensive and thorough investigation by the SIT. It said that the concerned offi als were vigilant, "but the situation as evolved post-Godhra in dent, was unparalleled and had overrun the state administration".

法官A M Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari和C T Ravikumar驳回了关于社区动员和武器储备的陈述,甚至在戈特拉事件发生之前,并称:“经过特别调查委员会的广泛而彻底的调查,这是毫无价值的”,相关官员保持警惕,“但godhra事件后演变的局势是空前的,已经超出了邦政府的控制范围”。

"Suffice it to observe that there is no tittle of material, much less tangible material to support the plea of the appellant that the Godhra in dent unfolded on February 27, 2002, and the events which followed, was a pre-planned event owing to the criminal conspiracy hatched at the highest level in the state" it said.

“足以说明的是,没有材料,更不用说有形的材料来支持上诉人的申诉,即发生在2002年2月27日的戈特拉事件,以及随后的事件,是预先计划的,是该邦最策划了犯罪阴谋。”

".... inaction in the response or even in a given case of non-responsive administration, can be no basis to infer hatching of criminal conspiracy by the authorities of the state go nment in absence of any clear evidence about the meeting of minds; and that, failure to respond to the messages sent by SIB (state intelligence bureau) was a concerted and deliberate act of omission or commission on the part of the state and other functionaries, as alleged. The SIT had recorded the statements of all concerned, including the offi als before forming the oion, as ned in the final report, to discard the allegation under consideration. The magistrate, as well as, the HC committed no error ...in accepting the final report presented by the SIT," the bench said.

法官说:“在没有任何明确证据的情况下,政府不采取行动回应,甚至在某一特定情况下不回应,都不能作为推断邦政府当局策划犯罪阴谋的依据;如指控的那样,未对SIB(国家情报局)发出的信息作出回应是邦和其他官员蓄意的不作为。如最后报告所指出,在形成意见之前,SIT已经记录了所有有关方面的陈述,包括官员的陈述,以放弃审议中的指控。法官和高等法院接受SIT提交的最终报告都没有犯任何错误。”

Referring to the failure of the state administration in controlling the violence, the bench said inaction or failure of some offi als of one section of the state administration cannot be the basis to infer a pre-planned criminal conspiracy by the authorities of the state go nment or to term it as a state-sponsored crime (violence) ag inst the min ity community.

法院在谈到国家行政当局未能控制暴力事件时表示,不能以国家行政部门的某些官员的不作为或失败为依据,推断这是政府当局预先策划的犯罪阴谋,也不能将其称为邦政府支持的针对族裔的犯罪(暴力)。

 

以下是印度时报读者的评论: 译者:Jessica.Wu

Feku

If Feku was active CM during the in dent, during court proceeding if active PM, how will any investigation be impartial? If Feku did not do, then who did it? The person who cms is the only one who can save Hindutwa, how did this happen?

如果莫迪在事件发生时担任首席部长,在法庭审判期间担任总理,那么调查怎么可能是公正的?

如果不是莫迪干的,那是谁干的?

那个声称自己是唯一能拯救印度教的人,这是怎么发生的?

 

Feku

Looks like Feku promised Raja Sabha membership the mylords

看来莫迪承诺了给上议院议员身份

 

matt

This in dent is a case of cause and effect. In India, min ity communities are almost always the ones that start trouble. The biggest disaster was Godhra, where only innocent people perished due to re gious dogma. The Godhra train fire occurred on the morning of February 27, 2002, when 59 Hindu pilgrims and karsevaks returning from Ayodhya were killed in a fire aboard the Sabarmati Express train close to the Godhra railway station.

这件事是因果关系的一个例子。在印度,族裔总是惹是生非。

最大的灾难是戈特拉事件,只有无辜的人因宗教教条而死。

戈特拉火车火灾发生在2002年2月27日早上,59名印度教朝圣者和印度教宗教义工从阿约提亚返回,在靠近戈特拉火车站的Sabarmati特快列车上的火灾中丧生。

V Lakshmana Rao

Killing of karsevaks were planned by Italion-barmaid Congress n Chara Chor Lallu.

杀害印度教宗教义工是国大党策划的。

 

User Parvez

if today in india undergoes a civilwar like situatation who will be responsible presi nt or pmo of India

如果今天印度发生类似内战的情况,谁来负责任,总统还是总理?

 

Ak

This dr will continue by seculars, liberals and fre m of champions. This brings money from abroad and bad to Modi or to country.

世俗派、自由派和言 论自由捍卫者将继续上演这出大戏。这能从国外吸金,对莫迪或国家而言都是坏事。

 

Natarajan D

indian judiciary is one of the worst. again they will appeal, what is to be done. once the judgement is given , appeals should be restricted for a period of say two years beyond which no appeals should be entertained, horrible lawyers can do anything for money.

印度司法是全球最差的世纪之一,他们将再次上诉。

一旦判决做出,上诉应该有时间限制,比如两年,

超过这段时间就不应该受理上诉,可怕的律师为了钱什么都做。

 

sonjusen

Perfectly well planned, that's what it appears!

计划得很完美,看来就是这样!

 

0 0 • Reply • Flag

How sad that Modi had to face media trial on behest of corrupt parties. All attempts were made to discredit him. False narratives sned out regularly. But you cannot hide Sun. Truth wins. It's the God will that he would become PM and change face of India for better

在腐败政党的要求下,莫迪不得不面对媒体审判,这是多么可悲啊。

人们想尽一切办法来败坏他的名声。虚假陈述常有,但是你无法隐藏太阳,真理通常获胜。

神希望他成为总理,让印度变得更好

 

Leon Fernandes

Aftermath result is that we have a great leader like Modiji to run the country. Riots are not good but sometimes it is necessary.more power to the Judiciary.

结果就是我们有了莫迪这样的伟大领导人来管理国家。骚乱不好,但有时是必要的。赋予司法机构更多权力

 

Karan

and Court took 20 years to determine this?

法院花了20年才做出判决?

 

prasad sawant

The left liberal ecosy em, funded liberally by enemies of India put up the falsehood.

由印度敌人慷慨资助的左翼自由主义者编造了谎言。

 

0 0 • Reply • Flag

Frankly speaking, Modi Sir was inexperienced and had left the job unfinished.

坦率地说,当时的莫迪缺乏经验,没有胜任当时的工作。

 

Ansari Naeemul Haque

Summary of judgement from layman's point of view no conspiracy and second inept Head of go nment in handling situation

从外行人的角度总结判断,没有阴谋,无能的政府首脑应对局势

 

Priyadarshan

It was infact preplanned by congress and some mus m ji dis and it was required to teach them a lesson that gujarat is not kashmir so that they dare not repeat the same thing again.

事实上,这是国大党和一些分子事先计划好的,我们要给他们一个教训,古吉拉特邦不是克什米尔,这样他们就不敢再故技重施了

Anjula Saksena

' Teach them a lesson ' is called conspiracy

“给他们一个教训”就是所谓的阴谋

 

Nkmm

Thecase is finally closed.A person of Modi calibre who has taken India to new highlights worldwide was not inquestion in any case. Now action to be taken ag inst person who tried their best to malign the image of New India

这个案子终于结案了。无论如何,一个像莫迪一样有才干的人,让印度在世界各地成为新亮点,这是毫无疑问的。现在该对那些极力诋毁新印度形象的人采取行动了

 

Sundar Rajan

The only conspiracy that I see is the trumped up charges filed ag inst Modi. This was clearly pre planned by the legal luminaries of the Congress . One should investigate the role of these people and the for the truth to come out.

我看到的唯一阴谋就是针对莫迪的捏造指控。这显然是国大党法律界的杰出人士预先策划的。要想查明真相,就必须调查这些人和国大党扮演的角色。

 

Hsf

USA and UK must apologize from Mr. Modi. Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi must be prosecuted for calling Modi "maut ka saudager and Gujarat maut ki kheti". Gandhi's are criminal mafia. Those people who blamed Modi must be punished. These shameless krouts justify 7,000 Sikhs murdered by Rajiv Gandhi.

美国和英国应当向莫迪道歉。索尼娅·甘地和拉胡尔·甘地必须被起诉,他们称莫迪为“mat ka saudager和Gujarat mat ki kheti”。

甘地是犯罪黑手党。那些指责莫迪的人必须受到惩罚。

这些无耻的恶棍为拉吉夫·甘地杀害7000名锡克教徒开脱。

 

Sahi

Punish the accusers, and their lawyers.

惩罚原告和他们的律师。

 

Sane Voice

so the court says modi is an incapable administrator.

法院说莫迪是一个无能的管理者。

 

User Left

Anti India forces of Congress will keep trying!

国大党反印势力会继续努力的

 

As m Khan

Supreme Court is also BJP's Parrot

最高法院也是人民党的鹦鹉

三泰虎原创译文,禁止转载!:首页 > 印度资讯 » 印度最高法院:没有证据证明2002年古吉拉特邦的骚乱是有预谋的,时任首席部长的莫迪是清白的

()
分享到: