从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

毕马威:中美将引领全球科技创新

2012-07-01 21:38 66个评论 字号:

印度Rediff网29日报道,全球咨询公司毕马威(KPMG)对来自技术行业的初创公司、中大型企业、风险投资公司和天使投资者的高管,展开了一项有关全球创新的调查。调查显示,虽然印度在创新方面取得显著进步,中国和美国仍将处于全球科技创新前沿。调查还显示中国将在技术创新领域挑战美国的领导地位,硅谷作为技术创新中心的地位将会受到潜在的挑战。未来几年有望成为技术领头羊的中国企业包括互联网企业腾讯和百度,以及快速增长的电信设备集团华为。

原文标题:US, China to lead global tech innovation
原文链接:http://www.rediff.com/business/slide-show/slide-show-1-tech-us-china-to-lead-global-tech-innovation/20120629.htm

毕马威(KPMG):中国科技创新将超过美国

毕马威

While India has made significant progress on innovation front, the US and China will remain at the forefront of global technological innovation with the cloud-enabled consumer technology and business transformation for enterprises leading the chart, a KPMG survey has said.

“Technology executives worldwide believe that China and the US will be at the forefront of technological innovation, with the cloud technology enabling both the next indispensable consumer technology and business transformation for enterprises,” it said.

毕马威的一项调查显示,虽然印度在创新方面取得显著进步,中国和美国仍将处于全球科技创新前沿,在基于云计算的消费品技术和企业转型方面领先。

调查显示:“全世界的技术高管相信中国和美国将处于科技创新的前沿,云技术使下一代消费必需品技术和企业转型变得可能。”

According to the survey, mobile technologies will continue to build on the cloud platform, providing breakthroughs to transform businesses.

The ‘Global Innovation Survey’ by the consulting giant pointed out that India has also made significant progress in the path of innovation.

KPMG surveyed executives from technology industry start-ups, mid-sized to large enterprises, venture capital firms and angel investors to identify disruptive technologies.

“India has made substantial and rapid strides on the path of innovation-based development and managed to adapt and implement a number of measures to support this development,” it said.

移动技术将继续建立在云平台,为商业模式的转变提供突破。

毕马威的这项题为《全球创新调查》的报告指出印度也在创新道路上取得了显著进步。

毕马威调查了来自技术行业的初创公司、中大型企业、风险投资公司和天使投资者的高管,以识别颠覆性技术(三泰虎注:天使投资者指用自己的资金投资一家初创公司的富人)。

“印度在基于创新的发展上取得了实质性的快速进步,设法适应和实施了支持该发展的大量措施。”

The Indian Government has also invested significantly in technology. Communication technology like 3G has already made a mark in the country and the introduction of 4G will be a key enabler for most of the businesses, the survey said.

“The cloud platform has been leveraged and several e-governance initiatives have been launched. While the government is one of the primary pillars to drive innovation and cutting-edge technology, involvement of the private sector is equally important for swift and effective enablement,” the survey said.

调查显示,印度政府也在技术方面进行了大量投资。在3G等通信技术上已经取得些许成就,4G的引入能带来大量的商机。

“云平台已经取得了杠杆作用,电子政务倡议已经被推出。虽然政府是推出创新技术和尖端技术的一个重要支柱,但是私营部门的参与对快速和有效的实现同样重要。”

The survey report said China will challenge the leadership of US in the field of technological innovation.

“There will be a potential challenge to Silicon Valley’s position as technology innovation centre,” it said, listing Apple as the top innovator in the world followed by Google and Microsoft.

调查报告显示,中国将在技术创新领域挑战美国的领导地位。“硅谷作为技术创新中心的地位将会受到潜在的挑战。”报告把苹果公司列为全世界最具创新公司,谷歌和微软紧随其后。

以下是印度网民的评论:

I Love China
by Poor IT Engineer (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:14 PM | Hide replies

Wish I was Chinese!!

我喜欢中国,希望自己是中国人!

Re: I Love China
by Tuchcha Aadmi (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 02:00 PM
you can always take the citizenship of China.. They’ll roll RED carpet for you.

你一直都可以获得中国国籍…他们会铺红地毯欢迎你的。

Re: I Love China
by salesjb (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:38 PM
what is this poor it engineer ?
Now most are getting 10 lakh per annum with 5 years of exp.

这个“可怜的工程师”是怎么回事?

现在大多数5年经验的工程师年赚100万卢比。

e: Re: I Love China
by Poor IT Engineer (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 02:10 PM
That’s pooor considering the environment around us. We sit in A/C with uninterrupted power supply, get used to high end laptops/desktops and enjoy delicious food in cafeteria.

Because of this we have to rent a home @30K which takes 40% of net take home salary. We cannot continue to buy the latest smartphones which are costing 40K. We cannot continue to takeup airtel broadband which is costing 2.9K per month. We cannot dine in the restaurants in our locality for 3 meals per day and 30 days per month, because each meal costs an average of 400 bucks. We cannot afford to save much to buy a Honda Civic for 13 lakhs. We cannot think of saving anything to buy a luxury home for 1.5 crores

Life is so misearable. That’s why IT engineers are poor. We need a salary of 40 lakhs per annum to sustain our living. Government should think about us.

考虑到我们周围的环境,这点工资太可怜了。我们坐在有不间断电力供应的空调办公室里,习惯了高端的笔记本、桌面电脑,在自助餐厅享受美味的食物。

正因如此,我们不得不租3万卢比的房子,此项占去了40%净拿回家的薪水。我们不能买要价4万卢比的最新款智能机;我们无法维系每月2900卢比的巴蒂电信宽带;我们一天三餐、一月30天都无法在当地餐馆就餐,因为每顿饭要价400卢比;我们无法省下足够多的钱来买130万卢比的本田思域;我们想都不敢想能省下钱来买1500万卢比的奢华居所。

生活如此悲惨。这就是IT工程师很穷的原因。我们需要年薪400万卢比来维持生活。政府应该为我们考虑考虑。

(三泰虎注:1人民币=8.7553印度卢比)

Communism vs democracy
by Ajai Jacob (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:07 PM | Hide replies

Hard work coupled with communism created the wonder of modern China.Democracy is good only for less populated countries like in the west.

India hs become a big hypocrisy rather than a democracy over the years.

勤劳工作加上共禅主义创造了现代中国的奇迹。皿煮只适合人口较少的国家,比如西方那样。

印度这些年变成了一个虚伪国家,而不是皿煮国家。

Re: Communism vs democracy
by Poor IT Engineer (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:11 PM
India is dynasty based democracy, which in true sense mocks the fundamental idea of democracy.
It’s just not about Gandhis; every Indian politician makes sure his next generation gets all the election tickets.

印度是基于皿煮的朝代国家,从真正意义上来说是模仿皿煮基本理念的国家。不仅仅是甘地,每个印度政客都在确保其后代能够获得选票。

Re: Communism vs democracy
by toga (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:14 PM
too late now. India is screwed.

现在太迟了,印度搞砸了。

backward nation
by biswanath roy (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 11:21 AM | Hide replies

how can a backward nation like china make so much progress? india which boasts having the second largest english speaking population after usa, with such prestigous institutions like IIT’s & IIM’s which are patterned on the well known western universities, lag behind china, where hardly a few thousands/lakhs can speak english go ahead of us? i think it is hard work and nationalist feelings amongst the chinese which is prodding them ahead, which at the present rate is making even the usa uncomfortable.

怎么中国那样的落后国家也能取得如此大的进步?印度能自夸拥有仅次于美国的第二大英语人口,拥有印度理工学院和印度管理学院等以著名西方大学为模式运作的著名研究机构,却让一个只有几千或者几十万人会说英语的中国领先我们?我认为是中国人的勤劳工作和民族主义情绪刺激他们前进,其当前的发展速度甚至令美国感到不舒服。

原创翻译:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com

Re: backward nation
by Chalta Hai (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 11:23 AM
The point is that the JEE/IITs are over hyped. Mostly the hype comes from within IITs (alumni, students) but sometimes dumb people take it at face value and don’t probe further to find the reality. IITs are below even Pakistani Tech universities.

重点在于印度理工学院被过度炒作了,大多数炒作来自于其内部,但是愚钝之人有时候只看其表面,没有进一步调查,以期发现事实。印度理工管理学院甚至不如巴基斯坦科技大学。

Re: backward nation
by toga (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:15 PM
Backward? that sounds like india. Shiet in public, no clean water, no electricity, low literacy rate… you name it.

落后?听起来像是在说印度。在公众场所拉屎,没有干净的水、没有电、低识字率…凡是你能说出来的都是。

Re: backward nation
by Poor IT Engineer (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:17 PM
We are Indians and They are Chinese. Respect China and the Chinese.

我们是印度人,他们是中国人。该尊重中国和中国人。

Failed Institutes
by Praveen Kulkarni (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 10:28 AM

Our great IITs & NITs are all failed to produce Innvative engineers. They take huge fund from Govt. & nothing will be contributed for growth of country. They are just like any other ordinary College.

我们伟大的印度理工学院和国家技术学院没有培养出有创新的工程师。它们从政府那里获得巨额资金,却没有对国家发展做出贡献。它们同其他普通学院没什么两样。

Chinese genius
by Ajai Jacob (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 09:59 AM | Hide replies

My brother-in-law recently got his ph.d from the US.My father attended the final ceremony.He was surprised to see that 70% of the other pass-out ph.d’s were chinese!

The chinese started out with copying the technologies of others and now they have reached the stage of being global leaders in innovation!
All this time,Indians and others have been deriding them for copy-catting and otherwise while the chinese quietly built their nation to become the second most powerful nation in the world.

Learn from them instead of being derisive to them.

我姐夫最近在美国获得博士学位。我父亲参加了毕业典礼。他吃惊地看到70%获得博士学位的是中国人!中国人以复制别人技术作为开始,现在已经达到了成为全球创新领导者的阶段!一直以来,印度人和其他国家的人嘲笑中国人是山寨猫,而中国人则悄悄把自己国家建设成世界第二大强国。应该向他们学习,而不是付之一笑。

Re: Chinese genius
by Ricky topping (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 10:06 AM
“Shenzou 9”, the CHINESE space shuttle just landed safely in the inner regions of Mongolia this morning. This brings them closer to sending man to the moon by 2020. CHINESE now are the third in SPACE TECH after the U.S.A. and former SOVIET UNION.

中国人的神州9号飞船今天早上刚刚在内蒙古地区安全降落。此举让他们离2020年前把人送上月球又更近了。中国人如今在太空科技上排第三,仅次于美国和前苏联。

IITians are not competant
by Praveen Kulkarni (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 09:58 AM

We have good institutions like IITs & NITs , but they are not capable to produce world class engeneers, they are not able to get single patent in field of technology. They cannot match with engineers of China / USA. They simply blame politicians.

我们有印度理工学院和国家技术学院那样的不错研究机构,但是它们没有能力培养世界级的工程师,没有能力在技术领域获得一项专利。它们无法比得过中国和美国的工程师。他们只会责备政客。

India
by arungopal agarwal (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:25 PM | Hide replies

India can do wonders, but our politicians and bureacrats are biggest hurdle, they do not want any reform in their working, want to take technological advantage only.

印度可以创造奇迹,但是我们的政客和官僚主义者是最大的障碍,他们不想在工作中实施任何改革,只想获得技术优势。

Re: India
by Poor IT Engineer (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 02:22 PM
If you were not born, This comment wouldn’t have been here.

So, no one knows what today have been, if “if” had been true.

如果你没有出生,就不会有这条评论。

所以,如果这个“如果”是真的话,没人会知道今天会变得怎么样。

Why in india IIT has not produced any Steve Jobs?
by greatbihar (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:14 PM | Hide replies

This question was asked by many duffers who could not able to make in to IIT even after 3 attempts.
Now the answer is if you have good quality seeds of Apple but if you don’t plant these seeds in fertile land and if you don’t regularly give water to these Good Quality seeds then these seeds will never become the Apple tree.

It has been proved that IItians are very successful in USA but in india they are not successful because here the organization is filled with dirty people who are expert in dirty politics and will never allow any one to be successful.

In USA if any one do good job, have talent then Americans always promote those people but in india reverse happens,if any one do good job,have talent then everyone starts to pull him down.

in india what matters most is your caste and state rest is just useless.

为什么印度理工学院没有培养出“斯蒂夫·乔布斯”?

许多考了三次都没进入印度理工学院的笨蛋会问这个问题。

答案是:如果你有优良的苹果种子,要是你没有把这些种子埋在肥沃的土壤中,没有定期浇水,那么这些种子永远不会长成苹果树。

已经证明印度理工学院毕业生在美国是非常成功的,但是他们在印度不成功,因为这里的机构到处是擅长肮脏政治的肮脏之人,他们永远不会让任何人成功。

在美国,如果有人表现不错,有才能,那么美国人总是会提升那些人。但在印度可是倒过来,如果有人干得好,有才能,那么每个人都会开始拉他下来。

在印度,最重要的是你的种姓和邦籍,其他都是没用处的。

原创翻译:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com

Re: Why in india IIT has not produced any Steve Jobs?
by Poor IT Engineer (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 12:21 PM
How many Chinese scientists/ engineers/ pioneers do you know? I am sure None. You got it??
Stop being a monkey and copying the West. Either do reverse engineering or create on your own.

你知道多少位中国科学家、工程师、开拓者?我确信你一个都不知道。没问题吧?

不要像一支猴子一样模仿西方。要么搞逆向工程,要么自主创造。

IITs are worse than White elephants
by jay b (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 10:56 AM | Hide replies

IITs where started by congress to make indian engineers who would ultimately serve the west at huge costs to the common man.

And this has what has happened for the past 5 decades. 99% of the IIT engineers have gone to the US and help them invent more things which the west has used to dominate,suppress the rest of the world and made huge money in the process. Except very few engineers(.01%) IITs have not only NOT given anything back to their motherland but have infact helped the west suppress India.

The same thing is now happening and being done by the so called NRIs(US,Gulf,Canada) who are putting pressure on the government to depreciate the rupee to make them more rich at huge expense(extreme inflation,cost of living) of the common man. The media is of course controlled by the west and the export lobbies who support the same.

印度理工学院是国大党建立的,为的是培养印度工程师,这些人最终服务于西方,培养成本却摊到了老百姓头上。

这就是过去50年所发生的事情。99%的印度理工学院工程师去了美国,帮助美国发明西方用于统治、镇压其他地方的东西,并从中赚取巨额资金。除了极少的工程师(0.01%)之外,印度理工学院不仅没有对祖国做出过任何回报,而且事实上帮助西方压制印度。

所谓的海外印度裔(美国,海湾地区、加拿大)正让同样的事情发生,他们施压印度政府贬值卢比,以让其以老百姓的巨大代价来让自己变得更富裕。当然,媒体是由西方和出口游说团体控制的。

DRDO
by ppager (View MyPage) on Jun 30, 2012 12:21 AM | Hide replies

is a innovation powerhouse.

It has made a super stealth plane that cannot be seen or heard by anyone.

In fact it is already flying and costs only 50 million dollars. You just cant notice it.

印度国防研究发展组织是一个创新工场。

它制造了没人看得见或者听得见的超级隐形飞机。

事实上,飞机已经上天了,成本只要5000万美元。你们只是注意不到而已。

Re: DRDO
by George (View MyPage) on Jun 30, 2012 12:37 AM
And it can fly only in your dreams.

它只会在你梦想中飞吧。

Chinese AC
by Biswajith Kizhakkethara (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 01:16 PM | Hide replies

I work in the Air conditioning industry where 5 out of 10 products now come from china. Most of indian products or from any other country put these labels and sell. The chinese products are cheap and state of art tech. Each year they churn products with new excellent features and prices are stable.

我在空调产业工作。在该产业中,10个产品中的5个来自中国。大多数印度产品或者来自其他国家的产品都贴上标签然后开卖。这些中国货价廉质优。他们每年都推陈出新,而且价格还稳定。

Re: Chinese AC
by Tuchcha Aadmi (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 01:58 PM
Very true.. Indian Govt must give priority to Manufacturing sector. Indian entrepreneurs/ managers should stress on quality in thier products

非常正确…印度政府必须优先发展制造业。印度企业家和经理人应该注重产品质量。

IT is the culprit for us being left behind
by Biswajith Kizhakkethara (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 01:11 PM | Hide replies

IT industry is virtually killing the manufacturing sector. This is a disaster as most of engineering regardless of any branch are hired by these outsources who are doing these odd jobs of the west. Govt spends millions on these eng gradutes whose jobs can are done by ordinary graduates with good training. In the end after all these years claiming that we are best place for IT, how many microsofts, googles or Oracles have we created?

IT业是我们落后的罪魁祸首

IT业实际上扼杀了制造业。这是一场灾难,因为不管是哪个分支的工程师,大部分被西方的外包工作雇佣走了。政府在这些工程师身上投入巨额资金,可他们做的是普通毕业生经过良好训练就能胜任的工作。结果,我们在这些年里声称自己是IT业中最棒的,但是我们建立了多少家微软、谷歌或者甲骨文公司呢?

原创翻译:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com

Re: IT is the culprit for us being left behind
by Tuchcha Aadmi (View MyPage) on Jun 29, 2012 01:56 PM
I dont blame IT for it.. But yes, manufacturing sector is neglected in India.

我不将其归咎于IT业…但没错,制造业在印度被忽视了。

友荐云推荐
  1. 中国的工业大小通吃,低中高端通杀,其实我们也出了很多优秀企业,只是我们的国家太过庞大,以致创新往往被掩盖过去

  2. 其实今天的大料应该是香港换届以及某些果粉准备呛声和唱蝗虫歌。不过,目前还没有跟进报道,所以先来瞅瞅三哥。还真不错,三哥居然是哈中的,我们的工程师居然能够被三哥肯定,这是多么大的一份荣耀啊。天天被人骂抄袭,山寨,廉价,一时间说我们好还真有点不习惯。

    话说,中国现在在科研创新领域投资确实是第2,产出应该也是第2.但是西方世界把我们妖魔化了,所以现在除了听到劣质支那货,听不到别的声音。这种声音最大的来自于海峡对面。

  3. 制造业是一切的基础,美国外迁制造业是最短视的决定,没有之一。可惜美国根本控制不了她的资本家,因为事实上是资本家控制美国,她阻止不了制造业的外移,所以到现在这种时刻,美国已经无力在经济层面阻止中国了。想想十年前,江三代低声下气憋着怒火装孙子的事情,韬光养晦的时代也许就这样渐渐过去了。

    • 呆呆地面对电视,呆呆地看着他们打这炸那,呆呆地盯着电脑,呆呆地木头似的看着,呆呆地被指着鼻子说该这样不该那样……这憋气的日子没有理由无尽头.

    • 美国外迁的是污染大,利润低的低端制造业,中高端制造业美国从来没有落下过,而低端制造业随时可以重启,你了解一下高端工业制品吧,机床、模具、材料、重机,这些工业制造业的脊梁,十几年前还是德日的天下,现在已经是美国的天下,制造业中国想要在质上赶上美国,还需要很多很多很多年

  4. 再次感谢三泰虎只致力于印度方面的文章,使之成为为数不多的翻译网中相当有个性的网站,这点精神值得小辈学习啊。 😀 我会帮忙宣传的

  5. 看了那么久网站,我想,我或许要改变下我对印度人的看法。
    我想,或许,应该说大部分的印度人都是理智和善良的,而我们以前经常看到印度人对中国不切合实际的评论只是小部分人,但也正是这小部分印度人评论的“可笑性”,所以被更多的翻译到国内,于是,我们看到的更多的是印度小部分人的“垃圾评论”。
    这点,或许博主可以说说看,你看过更多的印度人评论。
    当然,我相信在西藏和藏南问题和1962年冲突的问题上,应该大部分印度人是错误认识的。

    • 兄台,你看过0502给网友推荐的三哥视频吗?如没有看过,不妨看看。
      我本来谈了我的看法,但我把他删去了,怕影响你的判断。

      • 谢谢兄台,但是,我没有觉对我的一定是对的。我是想了解和学习。欢迎批评,请谈谈你的看法。
        另外,哪个视屏啊?在那里找啊,我想看。

        • 三泰虎帮你找了,0502推荐的是优酷视频,在优酷搜索“林晓光高兴:中国龙VS印度虎”就出来了,总共三个视频。

      • 刚刚看完了视频。“高兴”我以前在其他节目中看到过。
        我想,我上面的认识应该是对的。
        还有,兄台如果有其他看法,请一定赐教。谢谢

        • 这是一个粗坯子国民的国家,国民似乎还没有焠过火,你的所有认识都没有错。
          作为个体,他这辈子荣华富贵,没悬念.
          作为来自民主国家的青年才俊,似乎还有代表性。志大才疏,得意洋洋.根本毫无一点“奇谈怪论”,就是说没有自己的灵魂。他根本就不是中国青年的对手.

          • 避开三泰虎,看到了这个视频,让人很受启发.我也暂时映证了以前读三泰虎译文形成的观点.

          • 现在印象中的印度:
            大多数是穷困的人民,苦参宗教,不食肉类,不与人争。从好的来说,是人心向善的,从坏的来说,是萎靡不振的。
            部分的精英,少的可怜,是印度数倍于中国的贫富差距的体现。学术应该是有的,认知却存在问题;皆是能言商辩者,嘴上抹油,实际动手能力又有限;而把他们自己比作印度与中国的普通大众相比,确实领先不少啊。
            另外,谢谢“当石榴花盛开的时候”(兄台,你的名字能否短点啊?呵呵),谢谢。以后有不当之处,还望兄台继续赐教!

    • 总的说来,来过中国的印度人比较偏理智。那些“可笑性”的评论一般出自印度阿宅之手。印度人的脑残评论大家更喜闻乐见,所以就更多被转到国内,比如印度人说中国人是外表光鲜的可怜虫等。但是三泰虎博客没有刻意选择脑残评论,而是批评、赞美、脑残等评论都有兼顾,所以当大家看到印度人较多的理智评论时,会有点不太适应吧。

    • 不对,那是他们政府雇佣的职业喷子,糊弄他们国家上网的书呆子呐。只不过现在开始转向了,想在反华大合唱中玩一把雪中送炭,章显其特立独行。同时也钓了一些书呆子跟着抬。

  6. 中国也在创新呐,你不创新祖国也不允许啊(教育确实亟待改革),山寨只是穷国发展的必经之路,然后在积累经验财富的基础上改革创新,中国现在被冠以山寨国的帽子,还不是西方国家的围堵抹黑,说偷他们高科技术啥的,跟他意识形态不同嘛,再者,中国独立自主不听他的,他就找你事。日本韩国等国家穷的时候不也是山寨吗,一触而就,不可能的事。我感觉三哥也得学学了,不过得根据国情啊。
    我还想起一件其他话题的事,说中国人素质低,这也不是一时半会形成的,中国近代从啥时候才开始发展,民国左右,能出去留学的基本上都是很有涵养和志向的,而好多中国人在还是文盲的时候,不可能像欧洲那样工业文明经过了一二百年(日本也是,个人感觉韩国没有日本那种稳重,貌似文字去汉化,好多根源都去了),而更为重要的是他们的家庭成员是经历了至少两三代,接触外部世界,这种潜移默化的影响可是很重要。是不能排除少数人那种暴发户的思维,出国旅游,平常的坏习惯也带出去了(并非传统习惯,民族习俗),以至于给他们落下这样的坏印象,不排除对中国的偏见,封锁中国的时候,欧美对世界上许多国家的洗脑,以至于南美好多国家现在都认为中国人生活在朝鲜式的水深火热中,一天几块钱工资,一天劳累十五六个小时(个人浅见,不赞勿损啊)

    • 我认为山寨从不是我们的国家行为,而逆向设计大多是超越原版对象才发布面世的;即使是简单山寨也是那些浙江民营企业为了满足广大发展中国家贫民对高新工业品需求而进行的。同时,这也切实体现了我大汉民族在逆境、穷困中利用自身智慧和劳动求生存并且致富的本能。那些西方原创设计没有经得住我们农民智慧地破解,说明其并没有什么真实得技术价值。日本、韩国山寨我们汉字得时候谁管了?说中国人素质低?高铁车厢里大声喧哗的不乏台吧子、拉美人!

  7. 三泰虎辛苦了 最近更新的好快啊 我有个小问题想问一下 为什么把这个网站取名三泰虎啊???? 好像和翻译的内容没啥关系啊。。。。恕我才疏学浅 。 😛

    • 很多朋友提过这个问题。现实中,大家都叫博主本人“tiger”或者“老虎”,三泰虎是绰号衍生出来的,没有特别的意义就是了。当初建站的时候就不喜欢“xx网”什么的,喜欢有个性的名称。

  8. 由于中国略滞后于日本,南韩和台湾省的发展,东亚国家的驴友就先一步走出国门.日本,南韩和台湾省的驴友走出国门的阶段,说实在的还属于夹着尾巴的阶段.相当于歌词所戏言”外面的世界很精彩”,行为举止是小心翼翼的,当然就检点.这就跟西方人和世界各地人民留下深刻的印象.当他们对外部的世界习己为常,并且大没素质特没素质的时候,恰好夹着尾巴的中国人粉墨登场.在这样的处境下,中国人大背特背前三个国家和地区的驴友的不文明的黑锅.随着时间的推移,中国人的肌肉当然也开始松驰了,也干点不文明的举动.最终包揽了所有东亚国家的项目.在西方人看来,亚洲人一个样,前三个国家和地区的人大干特干,反正有中国人死扛。什么国人树枝没他们好?替别人辨护,你们不累我累!

  9. 补充:国人生性善良,说白了,怕惹事生非,绝对没有前三个了不起的哥们洒脱自在,加之语言障碍,在被别人侧目嘀咕时,那语言的脏水又湿不了衣裳,谁能在意别人说什么呢!又加之己有美誉的前三个哥们并不是有多高尚,这就令国人在“不随地吐痰”的面前雪上加霜。什么没有他们有素质,狗屁!邻居的娃娃一个在美国,一个在新加坡,我就带着这个疑惑问过他们,结果他俩可没有一点斯文相,痛骂前三,以上我的留言就是他们说的话,不过比我说的要完整得多.总之东亚国家在素质问题上彼此栽脏陷害,没有高下之分.随着时光的推移,国人的庐山真面目会慢慢展示在世界舞台上.

  10. 又补充:憋屈之事,国人首先检讨自己,在国内这基本上行得通,并且是我们的美德,而在西方人眼里,他们觉得非常奇怪.总之有一种莫名的瞧不起.这是两位高材生不折不扣的经历获得的教训.

    • 自从动车事故以来,国内高铁热冷却了不少。汉宜铁路开通国内都不怎么报道,印度媒体压根就没提,其他国家的媒体应该也没什么着墨吧。

    • 你是说“印度人在中国旅游”还是“中国人在印度旅游”,前者“印度人在中国”分类下有,后者有待补充