三泰虎

英国网友评论:羽联指控于洋王晓理等8名运动员消极比赛

北京时间8月1日,国际羽联针对昨晚伦敦奥运会羽毛球女双比赛发生的消极比赛事件做出处理决定,宣布8名涉案羽毛球选手因行为不端被正式指控。这四对组合分别为:中国的于洋、王晓理,韩国的河贞恩、金敏贞、郑景银、金荷娜以及印尼的格伊萨-波利、梅来娜。在女双A组的一场对决中,中国队头号女双于洋/王晓理以0-2(14-21、11-21)爆冷不敌韩国组合郑景银/金荷娜挑落马下,遭遇本届奥运会首场败绩,这样交出小组第一的中国组合将在1/4决赛中遭遇C组第一,避开了提前遭遇队友的可能性。

伦敦奥运会羽毛球消极比赛

北京时间8月1日,法新社消息,国际羽联针对昨晚伦敦奥运会羽毛球女双比赛发生的消极比赛事件做出处理决定,宣布8名涉案羽毛球选手因行为不端被正式指控。

这四对组合8名队员分别为:中国的于洋、王晓理,韩国的河贞恩、金敏贞、郑景银、金荷娜以及印尼的格伊萨-波利、梅来娜。

7月31日,在女双A组的一场对决中,中国队头号女双于洋/王晓理以0-2(14-21、11-21)爆冷不敌韩国组合郑景银/金荷娜挑落马下,遭遇本届奥运会首场败绩,这样交出小组第一的中国组合将在1/4决赛中遭遇C组第一,避开了提前遭遇队友的可能性。

除了中国队外,韩国队的比赛也出现了消极比赛的情况。在C组一场比赛中,韩国女双组合河贞恩和金敏贞在与印尼一对组合格伊萨-波利/梅来娜-焦哈利进行比赛时出现故意输分消极做法。

中韩选手相继被怀疑消极比赛后引起了国际羽联以及中国代表团的注意。羽联今日凌晨表示今天上午将召开听证会,就A组的中国组合于洋/王晓理与韩国组合郑景银/金荷娜,以及C组的韩国组合河贞恩/金旼贞与印尼组合波莉/乔哈里涉嫌消极比赛一事进行听证,届时会作出是否取消消极比赛选手参赛资格的决定。

中国代表团也对此事给予了回应, 中国体育代表团新闻发言人表示,中国体育代表团对女子羽毛球双打小组赛中发生的事高度重视,代表团领导得知此事,立即责成有关负责人对事情的原因和经过展开调查。

中国奥委会历来提倡在体育比赛中发扬奥林匹克精神,弘扬公平公正竞争的体育精神,反对任何理由、任何形式的违反体育精神和体育道德的行为和做法。中国体育代表团将依据对此场比赛的调查结果,做出相应的处理。

以下是英国《独立报》读者的评论:


原文标题:Badminton: China among those facing match-throwing charges following farcical scenes
原文链接:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/olympics/other-events/badminton- china-among-those-facing-matchthrowing-charges-following-farcical-scenes-7997235.html



Alterity ? 4 hours ago

Simple - disqualify all cheats from the competition.

简单,取消所有骗子的比赛资格。

trisul ? 3 hours ago

Why aren't they allowed to forfeit a match. It seems stupid to ask them to play hard, when they have an interest in loosing. The system needs to be fixed so that they always have an interest to win, otherwise it will always be a charade, a better one, or a lousy one.

I really do not think the players are at fault here, the system is wrong.

为什么他们不可以放弃比赛?既然输掉比赛有利可图,那么叫她们卖力比赛似乎是愚蠢之举。这个体制该修复了,以便运动员一直有获胜的兴趣,否则总会出现或好或低劣的消极比赛。

TomNightingale ? 2 hours ago ? parent


it is only a real problem when both would like to forfeit. It is easy to lose to a team that is trying to win.


只有双方都想放弃比赛才会真正是个问题。输给努力想获胜的对手是简单的。



Reeves ? 3 hours ago

All of the players from other countries should also refuse to play any Chinese players. See how far that would get China then!

其他各国选手也应该拒绝与中国选手比赛。看看中国能走多远!

bdono ? 4 hours ago

The really interesting thing is that all the Chinese badminton players can swim the 200 m butterfly in 1 min 45 seconds. . . .

真正有趣的事情是所有中国羽毛球选手可以在1分45秒内游玩200米蝶泳...

hodgeey ? 3 hours ago

Why? They're there to win medals, not entertain spectators.

为什么?她们是来夺奖牌的,不是来娱乐观众的。

ronandronnie ? an hour ago

The rules are wrong not the players.It might not be much fun for the spectators but tactical play is not cheating.........

错的是规则,不是选手。观众可能从中看不出多大乐趣,不过这是战术打法,不是欺骗...

kawasakiman ? 2 hours ago

Players should not know what their match result leads to, otherwise there will always be manipulation attempts to avoid the better teams. It's just tactics.
Afterall, I'm sure there's nothing in the rule books about trying your hardest.

选手不应该知道比赛输赢后的对手,否则一直会出现试图操纵比赛以避开更强大对手的现象。这只是战术。毕竟,我确信规则里没有必须尽力比赛的条款(译文来源:三泰虎)。

Alex ? 4 hours ago

That's the difference between amateurs and professionals. Professionals know how to throw a match and make it look good. #OlympicSpirit

这就是业余选手和职业选手之间的区别。职业选手知道如何在消极比赛的同时让比赛看起来符合奥运会精神。

ChrisBear ? 4 hours ago

All 4 teams should be thrown out! Simples!

4对选手应该统统取消比赛资格!简单!

TomNightingale ? 3 hours ago ? parent


Usually, people who say "simples" are idiots. You fit the pattern.


通常说“简单”的人就是傻瓜。你很符合嘛。



TomNightingale ? an hour ago

The problem is the rules of the competition conflict with the objectives. Don't blame the players.

问题在于比赛规则和目标相冲突。别怪选手。

Simon Fairburn

in the 1948 Olympics, rowers Bushnell and Burnell 'lost' their first round in order to avoid meeting the danish crew in the semis and thus improve their chances. How different is that to the badminton players?

在1948年奥运会中,双人桨选手布什内尔和布内尔为了在半决赛中避开丹麦组合而“输掉”首轮比赛。他们和这里的羽毛球选手有什么区别?

jebediah


It was 64 years ago. And yes it was probably deemed a dubious tactic at the time.


Past misdeeds do not justify or condone current misdeeds.


那是64年前的事情了。那时候很可能被认为是可疑的策略。


过去的罪行并不能辩护或纵容当前的罪行。



以下是英国《每日电讯报》读者的评论:


原文标题:London 2012 Olympics: Badminton World Federation considers expelling 'match-fixing' teams
原文链接:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/badminton/9443318/London-2012-Olympics-Badminton-World-Federation-considers-expelling-match-fixing-teams.html



james01

Surely, the way to stop this is to limit the numbers of participants? Why are Nations allowed to put more than one pair in the Doubles? The best pair in China should play against the best pair from South Korea, etc.

当然,避免这种情况的方法是限制参赛人数?为什么一个国家能派一对以上的选手参加双打?中国最好的组合应该对阵韩国最好的组合...

Ogham

Unfortunately the Chinese team and their coaches (and quite a few others by the look of it) don't consider the manipulation of the result of a game in order to try and get both their teams in the final, cheating. And with that kind of philosophy, anything is possible.

不幸地是,中国队及其教练不认可操纵比赛结果是为了让他们的选手会师决赛。欺骗行为。就凭这种理念,一切皆有可能。

Whitestones

Asians conspiring to throw games in order to help betting cartels?

Perish the thought!

亚洲人密谋消极比赛,为的是帮助博彩集团?

打消这样的念头吧!

james01

And the Chinese wonder why there is so much suspicion over their 'wonder-woman' swimmer?

中国人对他们的“奇女子”游泳选手遭受如此多怀疑感到惊讶?

mrbomber


Because the Western propaganda?


因为西方宣传?


jebediah


No. Because she's 16. Because it was an extraordinary improvement. And because the Chinese have form for doping in swimming within recent history.


不,因为她16岁,因为这是个离奇的进步,因为中国游泳队近期历史上出现过服用兴奋剂的事件。


TheVoiceofReasonII


well that's an eastern point of view......


这只是东方人的观点...



cjwilliams

I don't see how they were "cheating" . Both teams were playing to get the result for themselves which would give them the best chance of progressing to win a medal in the competition. It's called tactics.

If they don't want this sort of situation to happen, then the organisers need to change to format of the qualification stages.

我看不出他们怎么“欺骗”了。两队都是为了能够获得更好的晋级机会,以便夺取奖牌。这叫做战术。

如果不想让这样的局面发生,那么组织者需要改变资格赛阶段的赛制。

jbp


It may be that the format needs to be changed, and it may also be that 'cheating' is not the best word to describe what happened. However, the point remains that what they did is in contravention of both the spirit and rules of the games.


Yes, they should be disqualified.


赛制可能需要改变,“欺骗”可能不是描述所发生事情的最好的词。然而,问题的关键仍然是她们的所作所为违背了奥运会精神和比赛规则。


是的,她们应该被取消比赛资格。



anderson_1968

The obvious thing to do is to disqualify all of the competitors in the Women's Doubles and refuse to hand out any medals at all.

After that there has to be a serious discussion about the number of silly "sports" that are allowed in the Olympic Games.

We need to get back to the days when the Games were about track and field events - not daft novelty activities like beach volleyball and the like.

显而易见的事情是取消女子双打所有选手的比赛资格,拒绝颁发任何奖牌。

随后就奥运会里如此多的愚蠢“体育”项目举行严肃讨论。

我们需要回到奥运会只有田径比赛的时代——排除诸如沙滩排球等愚蠢新奇的活动(译文来源:三泰虎)。

TheVoiceofReasonII

The big laugh is the way the chinese staff manage to look surprised at what their team have done. Gold for acting ability I guess. Anyone who believes that the chinese players did NOT act on orders is living in a pre-industrial dreamworld.

令人哈哈大笑的是中方对自己选手的所作所为装得一副吃惊样。我猜是为了金牌而做出的努力。要是有谁相信中国选手不是奉命行事,那么他就是生活在工业时代前的梦幻世界。

wesayukdotcom

Sounds hilarious and quite entertaining!

Wish I was there to watch the spectacle....can we see it again on iplayer?

听起来非常滑稽,非常有趣!

真希望我当时有在那观看这个奇特的现象...我们可以在iplayer上看重播吗?

fairness6
Well, in that case the Olympics committee should allow ONLY one team from each country to compete. PERIOD. Otherwise, you can't accuse two strong teams from a country devouring each other and allow other countries to have the advantage. That would be telling them to be dumb.

既然那样,奥委会应该只允许每个国家只派一对选手参赛。否则,你不能指责来自同一个国家的两对强大的选手自相残杀,却让其他国家坐收渔翁之利。这不等于说他们是傻瓜吗。

此文由 三泰虎 编辑,未经允许不得转载!:首页 > 大杂烩 » 英国网友评论:羽联指控于洋王晓理等8名运动员消极比赛

()
分享到:

相关推荐