外文标题：Lessons from China's public transport system
Whenever I get stuck in traffic, I think of the absent-minded professor who could make his T Mobile fly, in Walt Disney's immensely funny 1961 movie of the same name. And wish: if only one could fly!
That would be the ultimate solution to the problem of urban mobility that's steadily worsening as more and more people leave their farms and villages and crowd into cities in search of an urban destiny.
But fly one can't - yet, that is. One can't also reverse the flow of urban migration any more. So what does one do?
Go personal? Have legs fitted with wheels, like a speeding skateboard that would allow one to sneak through even the tiniest openings in traffic?
Well, that's not quite a new idea. There's the Segway, for example, a self-balancing, two-wheeled human transporter that one can stand on and ride short distances. It's popular in the US and is becoming so in Australia.
There's an Israeli-designed electric scooter that can be folded up into a suitcase-size bundle and travels 10 miles per charge at up to 15 miles an hour.
Now Hyundai has come out with its version of a personal vehicle and revealed it at the recent Seoul Motor Show, giving the idea of urban mobility a new twist.
It's a one-person cabin shaped like an egg, called E4U, with two main wheels under the shell and two foldable rear legs. It runs on an electric battery, has a maximum speed of just over 18 miles an hour.
The driver controls the vehicle's speed and direction by simply tilting or turning his or her body, leaving hands completely free. The name comes from four Es: evolution, electricity, eco-friendliness, and, of course, egg.
But Segways and E4Us can only be part of the solution, not the solution itself. If going personal were the answer, we'd have been better off with the automobile, or the motorbike, as the provider of mobility at will.
But look at where it has landed us, choking our roads, degrading our environment, and slowing down the very mobility it's supposed to enhance.
There are more than a billion cars already around in the world and analysts say there'll be a billion more by 2030.
Asia's roads are filling up fast, and China alone, with some 120 million passenger cars on the road at present, could sweep past the US, which has the world's largest passenger car population - some 300 million - before the current decade is out.
That's why the whole question of urban mobility is increasingly linked up with the need to move away from personally owned mobility towards public mass transport that's fast and efficient.
That's why all the new emphasis is on building extensive networks of mass transit railways and bus rapid transit (BRT) corridors.
But even subways and BRTs, by themselves, aren't enough. They have to be parts of a bigger whole, a larger, integrated network to which all other modes of transport will be linked.
Therefore, the latest thinking is inter-modality, and the whole objective is now to build systems that are interchangeable and seamlessly accessed by a single smart card.
We see this in cities like Hong Kong, and also in other Chinese cities where public investments in transport networks have improved urban mobility significantly in recent years.
One such city is Guangzhou, capital of the southern Chinese province of Guangdong, where inter-modality innovations have earned a lot of praise.
Other than an extensive metro network - eight lines, 144 stations, 14 interchanges, 236 km of tracks (to exceed 600 km by 2020), and a daily ridership of 5.6 million - it operates a 22.5-km, direct-service BRT corridor, three of whose 26 stations are directly connected to the metro.
Its stations are subway-like, protected against the elements. Its service is subway-like, too, with one bus every 10 seconds, almost a continuous stream of 350 buses every hour in a single direction.
Integrated with this is a system of continuous bike lanes and bike sharing that further redefines the notion of urban mobility.
At stations along the BRT are 5,500 bike parking spaces. Just swiping a smart card, people can pick up a bike to cover short distances or complete the last mile to home or office. The first one hour is free. Beyond that, a nominal fee is charged.
A new dimension in urban mobility was reached in November 2010, in time for the Asian Games, when an automated, driverless, people mover went into operation, connecting the central business district to the Tianhe commercial area and serving local business and leisure facilities.
The 4-km underground facility consists of vehicles that look like subway trains but have bus-like wheels that drive on a concrete track.
Each vehicle can carry about 280 passengers, and each terminal provides an interchange to the metro. Again, inter-modality is the key.
by Padmakar Vallury
We take the tag of being the Oldest Civilisation on earth very seriously...May be as mark of respect for our past generations we should go back to mud roads,bullock carts, horses ,chariots and maybe at the best man pulled rickshaws....Going back will be very easy as we are very close to the past in any case....We will then continue to be proud and stay stuck to the tag of being the oldest civilisatio0n on earth......
Re: Oldest Civilisation
The oldest civilisation is certainly not the Indian one. It is the Egyptian civilisation that has that honour (if it can be considered an honour)!
The earliest Indian civilisation (starting around 3200 BCE) followed the Egyptian, Babylonian and the Chinese civilisations.
Re: Re: Oldest Civilisation
by Padmakar Vallury
So we are One of the Oldest Civilisation. I stand corrected..... We take the tag of being One of the Oldest Civilisation very seriously.......
Re: Re: Re: Oldest Civilisation
by karri reddy
Dont digest what ever west said about oldest civilizations... India have 1000's of history, Mahabharata period was at 3200BC.. before that Ramayana period..
by Sreenivas Ramesh
lack of public knowlege in indians.
by united india
but difficult to implement & digest. The solution is cut down population, just 2 child per family. Can anybody ask mulla families to cut down on marriages & children ? Then ONLY world will be peaceful & beautiful.
Re: Simple solution
It is not just the 'mulla families' that reproduce in large numbers in India. In large swathes of the country, especially in north India, there is absolutely no difference between the 'mulla families' and the 'non mulla families'.
Read Census reports in some detail to find out!
Re: Simple solution
by s pitchiah
population takes more resources than nature can rebuild, when the population become more and more productive diminishing resources are more for example if you make one person more productive he uses car, AC, cement house, etc... atlast next generation will suffer by no clean water and air, less food etc... Always better to reduce the population.