从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

专家:PLA仍落后美军30年

2013-10-07 19:01 50个评论 字号:

身在南京10月7日翻译。一位国外专家在简式防务周刊上发表了一篇文章,阐述了PLA落后美军30年的观点,引起了印度网民的关注。”虽然PLA接连获得了先进的武器系统,但是中国想要匹敌美国并建立世界最强的军事力量至少需要三十年。”前美国驻中国武官Dennis J Blasko在写给简式防务周刊的文章中这样写道。Blasko说道武器系统和装备是中国军队现代化的重中之重,但是他强调道如果中国想要挑战美国的地位的话单兵军事训练更为重要。

译者:身在南京
来源:三泰虎论坛 http://bbs.santaihu.com
外文:http://www.indiandefence.com/forums/china/33563-pla-still-30-years-behind-us-military-expert.html#ixzz2h14Eig00

9681221624

资料图:美国空军F-15攻击鹰战机编队降落地面

PLA still 30 years behind the US military: expert

专家称:PLA仍落后美军30年

While the People’s Liberation Army continues to acquire more advanced weapon systems, it will still take China at least 30 years to compete with the United States and build the world’s most powerful military force, according to Dennis J Blasko, a former US military attache to Beijing, in an article written for the Jane’s Defense Weekly on Sept. 27.

“虽然PLA接连获得了先进的武器系统,但是中国想要匹敌美国并建立世界最强的军事力量至少需要三十年。”前美国驻中国武官Dennis J Blasko在写给简式防务周刊的文章中这样写道。

Blasko said that weapon systems and equipment are crucial for China’s military modernization, but he stressed that the training of its military personnel is far more important if the PLA hopes to challenge the position of the United States. He added a PLA officer once told him that acquiring new weapon systems is not the only goal as it does not mean victory on the battlefield.

Blasko说道武器系统和装备是中国军队现代化的重中之重,但是他强调,如果中国想要挑战美国的地位的话,单兵军事训练更为重要。他补充道,PLA官员曾经告诉过他获得新式武器系统并不是唯一的目标,因为在战斗时,先进的武器并不意味着胜利。

图为F-22突破音障的瞬间

资料图:F-22战机突破音障的瞬间

For this reason, Blasko stated that China fully realizes the importance of training its soldiers to operate advanced weapon systems properly. Without enough combat experience in modern warfare environment, leaders of the PLA also know that the military is still 20-30 years behind its American counterpart.

因此,Blasko认为中国完全的意识到了训练士兵正确操作武器系统的重要性。尽管在现在的战争环境里PLA没打过几次仗,但是PLA明白他们始终落后美国20-30年。

A 2008 China Defense White Paper pointed out that the modernization of the PLA will not be completed until the mid-21st Century. The PLA is now conducting military exercises to speed up this development. For example, China now holds aerial training exercises similar to the United States Air Force’s aerial war games, or “Red Flag” exercises, Blasko said. PLA soldiers and officers are also being trained to combat electronic and cyber warfare, he added.

2008年中国国防白皮书指出中国的军事现代化直到二十一世纪中期才会完成。PLA正在进行军事训练来加速发展。例如,中国进行与美国空军类似的空军演习,或称”红旗”军演。PLA士兵和士官同时正在接受信息战的训练。

(译者注:希望大家理性发言,不要互喷,看着闹心啊!)

以下是网民评论:

译者:身在南京
来源:三泰虎论坛 http://bbs.santaihu.com/thread-7524-1-1.html

Ayush(印度)

what about india?? 50 years??

印度呢?落后50年?

Devil(印度)

once kaveri and some other object we will reach close to 40 years

一旦kaveri发动机和其它的项目完成了我们就只落后40年了.

Ayush(印度)

what?????????????????????

Devil(印度)

abhi 50 tab 40 reh jayenge progress slowly hogi

阿毗50…………(译者注:虎哥!!!!)

hy003(中国)

No matter about that,air quality is more important,China Open in Beijing meets bad air condition,maybe next time no foreign players want to join the game….

先不管那些,空气质量更重要,北京的中国公开赛空气状况堪忧,也许下一次就不会有外国运动员来参加比赛了….(译者注:跪求国家治理雾霾,然后把京沈高铁修了.)

S K(孟加拉)

and I think china is 20 yrs behind US

我认为中国落后20年.

layman(印度)

Unless Chinese can project power beyond SCS there is no reasons for US to get concerned about them as they are not much of a threat globally.

除非中国能把作战部队变猛否则美国没理由担心他们.因为PLA弱爆了!

omya(印度)

us fighters are around 14k, 12 active carriers…
while china has 1 active carrier (may b 2) and around 3.5k fighters….
china has a long way to go

美国战机大概14000,有12艘航母…
中国呢,就那么一艘(也许有俩),才3500架战机….
中国的路还长着呢 (译者注:三哥不遗余力地跪舔)

Marqueur(印度)

even if you have the best equipment … the moral of a soldiers or the arm forces is also important … asian countries arm forces compensate the outdated weapon systems with very high moral …

就算你们有最好的装备又怎样呢…士兵的士气和体能更加重要…亚洲国家的体能和高昂的士气能够抵消武器的落后…

S K(印度)

^^Yes

是这样滴!

Averageamerican(美国)

Moral is not usually very high when you know your equipment is going to get you killed.

当你得知装备太差即将丧命时士气通常不会太高昂.

Averageamerican(美国)

When I was in the USSR they were clearly 20 years behind the USA and with the Cluster F from the dissolution of the USSR I doubt if it got any better and maybe became worse. Any country can put a tremendous amount of resources into any individual project but in the county does not have the inferstructure to back it up it never works out over the long haul.

当我在苏联时,他们发明了克拉斯特-F导弹,但他们清楚的明白他们落后美国20年.随着苏联解体后,我认为差距更大了.任何国家都能将大量的资源投入到单个项目里,但是在缺乏良好的基础设施支持的国家里,总是这样是行不通的.



友荐云推荐

无觅相关文章插件,快速提升流量