从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

美国发布《中国军力报告》:悬殊的中印军力对比令印网民“大开眼界”

2013-05-09 00:05 81个评论 字号:

印度人看中国军力报告。三泰虎5月9日译文,印度时报原题《五角大楼:中国军事实力可能在上升》。据报道,从强大的远程导弹到新一代核潜艇,再到扩大太空、电子和网络战能力,中国正在追求长期的全面军事现代化,旨在打赢短期高强度地区军事冲突。这是五角大楼最新一期中国军力扩张报告的评估,该报告6日提交给了美国国会。报告承认“为台湾海峡的潜在冲突做准备似乎仍是中国军队投资的主要焦点和驱动力”。此外,中印悬殊的军力对比引发印度网民各种议论。

译文来源:三泰虎 http://bbs.santaihu.com/thread-6312-1-1.html
外文标题:China’s military might on an upswing, Pentagon says
外文地址:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Chinas-military-might-on-an-upswing-Pentagon-says/articleshow/19941805.cms

美国发布《中国军力报告》:悬殊的中印军力对比令印网民“大开眼界”

NEW DELHI: From potent long-range missiles and new-generation nuclear submarines to expanding space, electronic and cyber warfare capabilities, China is pursuing “long-term comprehensive” military modernization designed to “fight and win short-duration, high-intensity regional military conflicts”.

This is the assessment of Pentagon in its latest report on China’s expansive military might, which was submitted to the US Congress on Monday. The report acknowledges that “preparing for potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait appears to be remain the principal focus and primary driver of China’s military investment”.

从强大的远程导弹到新一代核潜艇,再到扩大太空、电子和网络战能力,中国正追求长期的全面军事现代化,旨在打赢短期高强度地区军事冲突。

这是五角大楼最新一期中国军力扩张报告的评估,该报告6日提交给了美国国会。报告承认“为台湾海峡的潜在冲突做准备似乎仍是中国军队投资的主要焦点和驱动力”。

But India, especially after the recent three-week military standoff with China on the eastern Ladakh heights, has to remain constantly on its guard. India is way behind in terms of military capabilities, and China’s massive build-up of military infrastructure all along the 4,057-km Line of Actual Control (LAC) further accentuates its already stark combat superiority.

Pentagon says China has 79 major warships and 55 submarines, five of them nuclear-powered. It is also undertaking a robust programme to build “multiple” aircraft carriers, after inducting its first one Liaoning last September, to project its power further offshore. The new Jin-class nuclear submarines, being armed with the 7,400-km range JL-2 missiles, also give China its “first credible, long-range sea-based nuclear deterrent”.

但是印度仍然不得不时刻保持警惕,特别是最近与中国在东部拉达克高地对峙了三个星期后。在军事能力方面,印度远远落后中国,后者沿着长达4057公里的实控线修建的大规模军事基础设施进一步加强了其业已明显的作战优势。

五角大楼称,中国拥有79艘主要战舰和55艘潜艇,其中5艘是核潜艇。此外,中国还在从事一个稳健计划,继去年9月服役了第一艘航母“辽宁”号后打算建造多艘航母,以便进一步将力量向外海投送。新的晋级核潜艇装备有射程7400公里的JL-2导弹,为中国提供了第一可靠的、远程海基核威慑。

In sharp contrast, India has only about 30 major warships, an ageing fleet of 14 conventional submarines and one nuclear-powered submarine, INS Chakra, leased from Russia without any long-range missiles. India’s first indigenous nuclear submarine, the 6,000-tonne INS Arihant, armed with the 750-km range K-15 ballistic missiles, however, is slated to begin sea trials soon. Only after it becomes operational by 2015 will New Delhi’s long-awaited nuclear weapon triad be in place.

With projects underway to build J-31 advanced stealth fighters, counter-space weapons, long-range ballistic and cruise missiles, guided-missile destroyers and frigates, Pentagon says it will “enable the PLA to conduct a range of military operations in Asia well beyond Taiwan, in the South China Sea, western Pacific, and Indian Ocean.”

形成鲜明对比的是,印度只有大约30艘主要战舰,一支14艘常规潜艇组成的老旧舰队,以及一艘从俄罗斯租来但未装备任何远程导弹的“查克拉”号核动力潜艇。然而,排水量为6000吨、装备有射程750公里的K-15弹道导弹的印度首艘国产核潜艇“歼敌者”号将很快开始试航,只有等到它在2015年开始服役后,新德里期待已久的三合一核武器才会到位。

随着建造J-31先进隐形战机、太空反制武器、远程弹道和巡航导弹、制导导弹驱逐舰和护卫舰的项目正在进行,五角大楼称这些项目将使得解放军有能力在远超台湾以外的亚洲、南海、西太平洋和印度洋展开一系列军事行动。

The report also takes note of the ever-growing China-Pakistan nexus. “Pakistan remains China’s primary customer for conventional weapons. China engages in both arms sales and defence industrial cooperation with Pakistan, including co-production of the JF-17 and F-7 fighters, F-22P frigates with helicopters, K-8 jet trainers, early warning and control aircraft, main-battle tanks, air-to-air missiles, anti-ship cruise missiles.”

Cyber-warfare is another top-priority for China, with it being viewed as “unconventional warfare as well as preemption weapons”. Pentagon directly accuses China of indulging in major online espionage and hacking of US networks to steal technology to fuel its military modernization. India, too, has faced incessant cyber attacks, with Chinese online espionage agents frequently breaking into sensitive Indian military and other computer networks.

这份报告还注意到了不断发展的中巴关系。巴基斯坦仍然是中国常规武器的主要客户。中巴关系涉及武器销售和国防工业合作,其中包括合作生产JF-17和F-7战机、搭载直升机的F-22P护卫舰、K-8教练机、早期预警控制飞机、主战坦克、空对空导弹、反舰巡航导弹。

网络战也是中国的另一个优先关注,被中国视为“非常规战争以及先发制人武器”。五角大楼直接指责中国从事网络间谍活动,称其侵入美国网络以偷窃技术来促进其军事现代化。印度也面临不断的网络攻击,中国的网络间谍特工经常闯入印度军方和其他敏感的计算机网络。

China ——— * Annual defence budget: $114 billion (declared budget but spends much more) * Large nuclear-capable missile arsenal. Road-mobile DF-31A missile can hit targets 11,200-km away, while the JL-2 submarine-launched missile has a 7,400-km range. * Armed Forces: 2.2 million troops * Submarines: 55 (at least 5 nuclear attack ones) * Major Warships: 75 (one aircraft carrier) * Fighter Jets: Over 1,700 * Main-Battle Tanks: Over 7,000

India ———- * Annual defence budget: $39 billion * Limited nuclear-capable missile arsenal. Agni-I (700-km), Agni-II (2,500-km) and Agni-III (3,000-km) inducted. Agni-IV (3,500 km) and Agni-V (5,000-km) being tested. * Armed Forces: 1.3 million troops * Submarines: 15 (one nuclear-powered but without strategic missiles) * Major Warships: Over 30 (one aircraft carrier) * Fighter Jets: Over 550 * Main-Battle Tanks: Over 3,200

中国:

*年度国防预算:1140亿美元(公开的预算,不过实际开支要多得多);

*可携带大型核弹头的导弹库,公路机动的DF-31A导弹可以打击11200公里远的目标,JL-2潜射导弹拥有7400公里的射程;

*武装部队:220万人;

*潜艇:55艘(至少5艘是核攻击潜艇);

*主要战舰:75艘(其中一艘是航母);

*战机:超过1700架;

主战坦克:超过7000辆

印度:

*年度国防预算:390亿美元;

*有限的可携带核弹头的导弹库,烈火I(700公里)、烈火II(2500公里)、烈火III(3000公里)已经服役。烈火IV(3500公里)和烈火V(5000公里)正在试验;

*武装部队:130万人;

*潜艇:15艘(其中一艘是核动力潜艇,但没有装备战略导弹);

*主要战舰:超过30艘(其中一艘是航母);

*战机:超过550架;

*主战坦克:超过3200辆

以下是印度网民的评论:

本文论坛地址:三泰虎论坛 http://bbs.santaihu.com/thread-6312-1-1.html

teji (noida)
If USA is so concerned about Chinese military might, it should assist India to counter China, rather than strengthening Pakistan, a state which grows terrorism ..
Agree (17)Disagree (7)Recommend (7)

如果美国真的如此关心中国军力,那就应该帮助印度反击中国,而非加强一个发展恐怖主义的巴基斯坦。

Shinto (Sherwood)
Promote self made weapons…..attract Indian companies to develop our own defence weapons….china is making itself……why not INDIA?40 yrs before Chineese and Indian people’s life standard was same but no Chineese is 20 yrs head…..
Agree (14)Disagree (3)Recommend (8)

提升国产武器…..吸引印度公司发展国产武器……中国在自我发展…..为什么印度不能呢?40年前,中国人和印度人的生活标准是一样的,但中国人现在领先20年…….

Blue Saturn (Delhi)
Why Pentagon is comparing the military capabilities of India and China only? Why there is no comparison of China and US capabilities ? or China and Japan military capabilities ? Is Containing China India’s job alone ? India has enough capability to defend itself. But, Containing dragon is job of All democratic nations around including USA, western countries, Japan, SEA countries etc……. Primary responsibilities lies with USA, this monster has been created by US only..
Agree (13)Disagree (3)Recommend (6)

为什么五角大楼只比较印度和中国的军力?为什么不比较中国和美国的军力?或者中国和日本的军力?遏制中国是印度一个国家的事吗?印度有足够的能力来自卫,但遏制中国龙是所有皿煮国家的事,包括美国、西方国家、日本、东南亚国家……主要责任落在美国身上,这个怪物就是美国培养出来的…..

flip (leh)
China has problems with many countries – India, Japan, Vietnam, Phillipines,etc. The simple answer to contain China is to form an Alliance – Indo Pacific Alliance (similar to Nato) All countries having disputes with China come together under this Alliance and an attack on any one country is an attack on all the countries in the Alliance and therefore at war.
Agree (16)Disagree (6)Recommend (5)

中国和许多国家存在纠纷——印度、日本、越南、菲律宾等。控制中国的简单方法是组成一个联盟——即印度太平洋联盟(类似北约)。所有和中国存在纠纷的国家在这个联盟下走到一起,中国攻击任何一个国家就是攻击联盟内的所有国家,随之而来的是群起开战。

Sushil Kumar (Chennai)
And Indian army on the down-swing.
Agree (4)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

印度军力却在下降。

Ravi Shankar (Hyderabad)
China is getting itch on its asss*. It should learn from Japan, what happens when war happens
Agree (3)Disagree (4)Recommend (1)

中国是屁股痒了,应当从日本得到借鉴,看看开战后会发生什么。

Indian voter who has visited China (India)
China sneezes…India p!sses in its pants. Thanks to Khangress.
Agree (6)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

中国一打喷嚏,印度就尿裤子,多亏了国大党。

pingmenav (Bangalore)
Long Long way to go …India !
Agree (4)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)

印度还有很长的一段路要走!

Shri Shridhar (India)
No Comparison……………………………..
Agree (1)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)

没得比………

Shri Shridhar (India)
By Importing chinese goods we are funding their defence budget…………. Ban or reduce import from china…
Agree (2)Disagree (7)Recommend (1)

我们进口中国货就是在资助其国防预算……禁止或减少从中国进口吧……

sarfaraj (Bangalore)
Capability to attack and capability to defend are two different things, China may have more attacking capability but it is still not enough to defend Indian attacks. If a war happens between India and China then both the countries will have large damages.
Agree (7)Disagree (3)Recommend (1)

进攻能力和防守能力是两码事,中国可能有更强的进攻能力,但不足以防守住印度的攻击。如果印度和中国爆发战争,那么两国都将遭受巨大损失。

【译文来源:三泰虎博客】

Speaking Observer (jamshedpur/delhi)
By this comparison I can conclude that India is nowhere to China. India has to take some good moves to protect itself from chinese
Agree (7)Disagree (3)Recommend (2)

经过这么一比较,我可以得出结论,即印度连中国的边都沾不上。印度得采取一些好的措施来保护自己免受中国人的威胁。

Dharmendra (Mumbai)
telling stats of the chinese plans, both india and china have nearly same population but china spends 6 times more than India and has nearly 4 times more weapons etc even as common chinese live in hunger
Agree (5)Disagree (3)Recommend (2)

从这份统计可以看出,印度和中国的人口差不多,虽然普通中国人忍饥挨饿,但中国的开支是印度6倍不止,武器接近4倍。

sivaram (Oman)
To win a War presently, not required so many weapons. therefore no need to compare the numbers
Agree (2)Disagree (3)Recommend (1)

目前要打赢一场战争,不需要这么多武器,所以没有必要比较武器数量。

joshua (chennai)
indian army is fit to fight only pakistan. they cannot even think of messing around with china until our wonderful politicians give up on corruption. we have a lot which is just worried about bank balance rather than the safety of the people. bjp or congress cannot uproot corruption people have to change. i don’t see any future for us
Agree (6)Disagree (2)Recommend (2)

印军只适合打巴基斯坦,在政客放弃腐败之前,印军压根就不敢想和中国胡闹。我们有太多政客只担心银行存款余额,却不担心人民的安全。人民党和国大党无法根除腐败,人民得做出改变。我看不到我们有什么未来。

Kumar (ASK)
It’s a direct message to India to buy more and more arms from the U.S. and that the dependence on Russia for India’s military needs has not let India reach anywhere. It’s as simple as that!
Agree (10)Disagree (2)Recommend (2)

这给印度传达了一个直接的信息,即印度得从美国购买越来越多武器,印度军备依靠俄罗斯并未把印度带往何处。就是这么简单!

Kiran (Bengalooru)
Hello US: Say Directly That U WANT to SELL MORE OF UR WEAPONS to INDIA, ,, indirectly to Keep CONTROL OVER CHINA In case Of WAR… That’s It ( But TRUE FACT IS CHINA HAS MORE MILITARY CAPABILITY THAN INDIA)
Agree (4)Disagree (2)Recommend (1)

你好,美国:直接说吧,你想把更多武器卖给印度…….战时可以间接控制中国…..就是这样(中国军力的确在印度之上)。

Dharmendra (Mumbai) replies to Ivan Bigger
china is communist and people have no rights, they are slaves
Agree (2)Disagree (2)Recommend (0)

中国是gcd的国家,人们没有权利,他们是奴隶。

dr. shimal (india)
china, the worlds new nazis are coming….run babu run!
Agree (10)Disagree (2)Recommend (2)

这个世界上的新纳粹——中国来了…….快跑!

Anand (Raipur)
Now there is some serious need of buying more and more defense stuffs which should be financed by Swiss Bank! If the ministers can realize the seriousness of this report.
Agree (5)Disagree (2)Recommend (0)

如果部长们认识到了这份报告的严重性,那么印度真的急需用瑞士银行的存款来购买越来越多的防卫装备。

IndianCitizen (India)
The country should find alternatives to Huawei communication devices which are a huge security threat. On the one hand we complain of Chinese cyber-threat, on the other hand we use their wifi equipment. We don’t know if the data moving between computers is also flowing into Chinese servers.
Agree (4)Disagree (2)Recommend (1)

国家真的应该为华为通信设备寻找替代品,否则会带来巨大的安全威胁。一方面,我们抱怨中国的网络威胁,另一方面却在使用他们的wifi设备。我们不知道计算机之间传输的数据是否也会流经中国服务器。

Raj (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
You mean Pentagon knew it only now? I am sixty and I knew it more than fifty years ago.
Agree (4)Disagree (2)Recommend (0)

你意思是五角大楼现在才知道?我60岁了,可我50年前就知道了。

Thomas Cheenath (India)
Pentagon is telling other countries to buy the arms and ammunitions from the US for which they are praising the strength of the Chinese……
Agree (4)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

五角大楼是叫其他国家从美国购买武器弹药,所以他们要称赞中国的军事力量……

PARTHA (kolkata)
DO NOT CONFRONT WITH CHINESE. ALSO DO NOT LOWER OUR HEAD IN FRONT OF CHINESE. BETTER WE SHOULD ALSO UPGRADE OUR CAPABILITIES STEADILY TO MATCH WITH CHINESE.
Agree (4)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

别和中国人对抗,也别在中国人面前低头,要匹敌中国人,就最好稳步升级军事能力。

Reason (India)
What does this mean…… trying to undermine India’s defense system…… It seems as if there is going to be a war ahead……
Agree (1)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)

什么意思…..试图诋毁印度的防御体系…….说得好像战争就在眼前……..

Saagar Chandel (Lucknow, India)
looks as if India is sleeping…
Agree (7)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

看来印度在睡觉……

Himesh (Pune)
“Indian elephant Where are you? Chinese dragon prepares to engulf you” Delhi pl. stop playing pity internal politics. Concentrate on border frontiers and technological up-gradation…
Agree (8)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

印度象,你在哪里?中国龙准备吃掉你了。

德里,请别再玩弄内部政治了,专注边界事务和技术升级吧………

Annamalai (India)
China is only one near future COUNTER to US. Their fear is justified.
Agree (8)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

中国是不久的将来唯一能反击美国的国家,他们的担心是有正当理由的。

vswami11 (Hyderabad)
Hope this is gonna be eye opener for Indians
Agree (2)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)

希望这份报告能给印度人开开眼界。

友荐云推荐
  1. 中国在世界地位很低,连号称唯一盟友的巴基斯坦都开始反华游行了。在国外基本任何一个国家的人,都认为中国是差的。

    • 你懂个屁,有有什么证据说‘在国外基本任何一个国家的人。。。’?
      那好,那我说你是一条人见人扁的狗。

    • 哈哈哈哈,狗急跳墙了啊!过来,给哥叫两声听听。 :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: 你说国外很多人不喜欢中国,这倒是可能的。咱也从没指望你这样的狗能喜欢。中国摔打这么多年,会在乎你这种螳臂当车的货?
      现在的中国,不管你喜不喜欢,你哪只眼敢把中国地位看低?
      回去问问你主子,敢不敢明天就跟中国断交开战?敢的话,我也算你是条汉子。不敢的话,你就乖乖过来做狗看门好不好?

    • 你白痴吗,中国是世界公认的第二,能差到哪里去?你所谓的差是跟美国比吗?还有,你在哪里?你所说的国外基本任何一个国家有什么依据,国外所有国家的政府发言人都表态说不喜欢中国吗?没有根据就不要胡说八道,别搞得自己跟个阿三似的,鄙视之……

    • 印度就是好,印度就是强。印度就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强,就是强。
      药药,切克闹,跑马的汉子你威武雄壮。。。哎哎,街边那个三岁的小妹妹等等我,叔叔教你论床上遥感操控的基本

  2. Kumar (ASK)
    It’s a direct message to India to buy more and more arms from the U.S. and that the dependence on Russia for India’s military needs has not let India reach anywhere. It’s as simple as that!
    Agree (10)Disagree (2)Recommend (2)

    这给印度传达了一个直接的信息,即印度得从美国购买越来越多武器,印度军备依靠俄罗斯并未把印度带往何处。就是这么简单!

    Kiran (Bengalooru)
    Hello US: Say Directly That U WANT to SELL MORE OF UR WEAPONS to INDIA, ,, indirectly to Keep CONTROL OVER CHINA In case Of WAR… That’s It ( But TRUE FACT IS CHINA HAS MORE MILITARY CAPABILITY THAN INDIA)
    Agree (4)Disagree (2)Recommend (1)

    你好,美国:直接说吧,你想把更多武器卖给印度…….战时可以间接控制中国…..就是这样(中国军力的确在印度之上)。

    印度还是有清醒的人在的

  3. 我看了五角大楼的这份91页报告,里面并没有对比中国与印度。里面只讲中国军力现状,军区分布图,领土纠纷情况,能源供给图,导弹覆盖图等,关于印度的军力是这篇文章的作者自己加的,让印度网民以为这报告就是对比中国和印度似的。 😐

    • 印度瘪三一向的脑残加二逼,看文章永远断章取义,就这种智商的人种,还相当常任理事国!做他的春秋大梦去吧!

  4. 印度劣等货色,也就他们媒体自己忽悠自己,杀他们我都嫌浪费我的子弹。三哥对我国的巨型军事工业有何感慨?想买可以卖给你们,不买就卖给巴基斯坦,让穆斯林来杀光棕皮黑鬼们。

  5. 老美这招挑拨离间用的好,它就希望中国和印度或者是日本开战,然后打的两败俱伤,中国人能看穿老美的把戏,印度阿三还有小日本普遍看不出其中的猫腻

  6. 从这份统计可以看出,印度和中国的人口差不多,虽然普通中国人忍饥挨饿,但中国的开支是印度6倍不止,武器接近4倍。
    —————-
    笑死我了, 5盧布, 給, 不用謝.

    • 多少有点。不过印度人真的都这么井底之蛙吗?会不会三泰虎没有翻译所有的评论?或者这个网站只是那些欢乐三哥们喜爱的聚集地?话说,看了印度人Navneet的游记和回复的品论,能够正确认识中印差距并支持中印友好的人也不少啊。

  7. 印度人在世界地位才是最低的,签证方面,大部分国家针对印度要比对中国人严格得多,因为印度人素质整体低下!

  8. 现在和印度打仗将会是我们衰落的开始,和印度友好才是兴盛的开始。要知道,他有十多亿人,就那么点土地,我们能打来什么?进十步退七步慢慢蚕食才可以。要地不要人是正确的啦!我们最主要的是要和他们做生意,把我们的汽车啦,电子产品啦,高速铁路啦,大坝工程啦之类的都揽下来。日本就不一样啦,这是个牛逼的民族,不承认也不行,科技和工业仅次于美国,要不是受着资源匮乏和国土面积狭小的限制,再加上二战战败成了附属国,早就翻天了。如果将来真的要打仗,就是要把它打残打服才行。日本估计几百年内不会有核武器啦,它也只是叫嚣罢了,打仗的事情,他不敢的。菲律宾这个操行的傻逼,让他从我们的岛屿上滚回老家,然后经济制裁就要他命。所以,只要我们没有战争意愿,打不起来的。我们闷头发大财,造航母,造潜艇,造灰机,造各种先进武器,准备着有朝一日打第三次世界大战就是了。

  9. 人民日报公开质疑琉球群岛的归属问题,是中国开始反攻的标志,天朝看中的可不光是一个钓鱼岛了,真是值得期待

  10. 印度和中国的人口差不多,虽然普通中国人忍饥挨饿。

    看到这句话我泪流满面啊。早上没吃东西,中午好不容易找到些青草将就着吃了一顿。现在是饿着肚子回帖啊。。。。。

  11. 日本虽然没有核弹,但是它的核技术是很成熟的,它可以在最短的时间内造出核弹并装备部队!中国还需要变得更强大才行!

    • 等他造成核弹来,中国的核弹已经可以问候它无数遍了,而且中国已经是世界上仅有的几个掌握第四代核技术的国家,核弹永远对国土较小的国家有致命威胁。

    • 这些倒不担心,原子弹的质量比氢弹差成百倍,氢弹的威力比原子弹大得多。若有一天中日真的不幸发生核战,日本只能摧毁中国几个城市,而日本本土将从地球上被彻底抹掉。 :mrgreen:

  12. 看了三哥的评论。。我才知道。。原来我们国家的普通老百姓都还处于忍饥挨饿的阶段。。。

  13. 建议虎哥全文转载这篇【“现代玄奘”谭云山之子谭中教授口述中印关系史】,里面有很多亮点,应该也很符合三泰虎网站网友的口味http://www.guancha.cn/tan-zhong/2013_05_08_143263.shtml

  14. 凡跟中国多少有点小过节的国家都喜欢动不动端出伟大美国来对付邪恶中国~~仿佛老美不仅是上帝还是他们每个人随时随地的保护神,倘若中国胆敢欺负或挑衅他们中的任何一个,那随着一声响亮的口哨或是一阵舞台效果的神秘烟雾,手执光剑披着斗篷高举盾牌内裤外穿的美国队长就会从天而降闪亮登场!跟着不是老钟灰溜溜的逃走就是被神奇队长三下五除二的撂倒在地束手就擒……..

    吼吼,多美妙的故事桥段啊,可惜现实不是幻想~~吊诡的事实是但凡每每口沫横飞义愤填膺的吹嘘老美天降神兵与中国大战的嘴炮迷绝不会是USA,而真正的美国鬼子个个都是狡猾大大的老狐狸,他们会是那种傻乎乎冲在战场最前面的英雄二B吗?打死他也绝对不会~更何况还让他流血流汗出钱出力去保护他眷养的斗犬和看门狗,你想老美会吗?那简直是六月天能冻死人的冷笑话!

    美国人最会干的事情就是一面煽动头脑简单的个别蠢货去调戏挑逗兔子或毛熊的神经中枢,一面叫所谓自由世界同战线盟友组织各种军事和舆论力量在正面战场准备迎战赤色共产的逆袭,而自己却揣着一颗淫荡的心私下里悄悄的与中俄打情骂俏互通款曲热烈的搞基~~不仅和毛子结成战略伙伴,同时间抛着媚眼嗲声嗲气的对兔子说,达令,咱俩是G2~~

    这才是地球村村长的真实面目,也只有如此,他才能继续顺利的连任村领导~~~只有巴子棒子鬼子猴子和黑鬼阿三这群村口游荡不学无术游手好闲的小混混,才会相信那种内裤外穿的超人动辄举火车转地球的弱智肌肉男,也最爱幻想有个急公好义除暴安良的美国队长每每会在自己要饭或挨揍的倒霉时分总是传奇般的关键时刻出现来搭救自己!可惜~~梦总归是梦,那种脑残英雄只有在童话或梦中出现。没有利益诱惑,公平公正公理?民主自由正义?屁啦~~老美说,那是搂架时哄呆人和歹人听的~~现实里?做梦去吧!~~

  15. 路过……为什么三哥总要拿来比一下,然后找点不自在!
    就像某些人总要和米国比物价一样!

  16. 从这份统计可以看出,印度和中国的人口差不多,虽然普通中国人忍饥挨饿,但中国的开支是印度6倍不止,武器接近4倍。
    ———————————————————–
    我的个天啦,这个世界上最大的民主国的国民从哪得来的信息啊!忍饥挨饿?我还没吃早饭呢!因为昨晚喝多了,早上没胃口啊。

  17. 从这份统计可以看出,印度和中国的人口差不多,虽然普通中国人忍饥挨饿,但中国的开支是印度6倍不止,武器接近4倍。
    你干脆直接说我们在咬树皮得了。

  18. 我就是新上任的大印度军事委员会会长 天朝一年军事投入两千万亿美元搞军备 别拽我 不想买车车了 恩恩 继续哈 我们要买美国的航母 花多少无所谓 一定要在海上遏制中国 还有导弹定俄罗斯 花岗岩集团二舅家小女儿的三舅妈家的 坦克要买以色列我妹夫家赤丸株式会社的 还有就不一一说了 同志们 天朝军事实力太强了 据说他们的新疆兵团还养鸭子 我们的圣河不包产啊啊啊啊啊 我们要买买买买买买买买买 不差钱