从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

中国警告美国不要在南海兴风作浪

2012-06-05 17:01 46个评论 字号:

在新加坡举行的第11届香格里拉对话会上,美国国防部长帕内塔强调亚太地区对美国的未来至关重要。帕内塔称到2020年前,美国海军将改变目前在太平洋与大西洋分别部署50%战舰的格局,美国在太平洋地区游弋的军舰将占到60%。这意味着美军将在太平洋地区部署至少6艘航空母舰,以及众多巡洋舰、驱逐舰、潜艇与濒海战斗舰。印度时报援引中国媒体的话称,南海属于中国的一部分,警告美国不要在南海兴风作浪

原文标题:China warns US against ‘muddying waters’ in South China Sea
原文链接:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/China-warns-US-against-muddying-waters-in-South-China-Sea/articleshow/13767540.cms

美国“华盛顿”号航母

美国“华盛顿”号航母

BEIJING: It was no time to “make waves” in the disputed South China Sea and dance behind a “Pied Piper”, China’s official news agency warned today, after US said it would shift the bulk of its naval fleet to the Pacific Ocean by 2020.

“It is advisable for some to refrain from muddying the waters and fishing therein and for some others to desist from dancing behind a Pied Piper whose magic tone, as tempting as it is, might lead its followers astray,” said Xinhua in a commentary, referring to the sea, which is part of the Pacific and the subject of overlapping territorial claims.

在美国声称2020年前将把大部分海军舰队转移到亚太地区后,中国官方媒体今天警告不要在存在争议的南海兴风作浪,不要在“吹笛者”后面起舞。

南海属于太平洋的一部分,是领土主权声张的重叠区域。新华社在评论中称,忠告某些国家不要搅浑水和在那里捕鱼,忠告其他一些国家在语调具有诱惑力的吹笛者后面起舞中保持克制,它可能导致追随者走向灭亡。

China claims the South China Sea in full, and it is also claimed in whole or part by Taiwan, Brunei, Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines.

The much-hyped China threat to the freedom of navigation in South China Sea is a pure invention, Xinhua said.

“China has seen its political, economic and military strengths growing markedly,fabricating new claims is not in its blood,” said the agency.

中国声张整个南海主权。台湾、文莱、越南、马来西亚和菲律宾等国家地区也声张部分主权。

新华社称,大肆炒作的中国对南海航运自由的威胁纯粹是无中生有。

中国在政治、经济和军事实力上都显著发展,捏造主权声张并不是与生俱来的。

It was Beijing’s “genuine wish” to turn the South China Sea “into a sea of peace, friendship and cooperation,” added Xinhua, in the commentary titled ‘Not to make waves in South China Sea’.

In a major re-posturing, US today announced it will shift the bulk of its naval fleet including as many as six aircraft carriers to the Pacific by 2020 as part of new strategic focus on Asia.

The decision to deploy more warships to the Pacific Ocean, defence secretary Leon Panetta said, was part of a “steady, deliberate” effort to bolster the US role in the area, deemed vital to American interest recently by President Barack Obama.

新华社在题为《不要在南海兴风作浪》的评论文章中称,北京真诚希望将南海变成和平、友谊和合作的海洋。

在一次重大调整中,美国今天宣布在2020年前,将把大部分军舰转移到太平洋,包括6艘航母,以此作为关注亚洲的新战略的一部分。

国防部长帕内塔称,在太平洋部署更多军舰的决定是稳定和审慎努力的一部分,旨在支撑美国在该地区的作用。奥巴马总统最近认为该决定对美国利益至关重要。

以下是印度网民的评论:

Pratul Birla (Kolkata)
History book written in the US in 2040 will read something like this ……. When China was building a strong nation , India had no clue , its ministers were making money , the govt machinery was looting money and people were only busy displaying their acquired wealth by importing foreign goods, building palatial houses and not paying taxes . The nation was sleeping to the threat of China and in 2019 when China attacked India , it had no answer. The war got over in three days…….
Agree (33)Disagree (8)Recommend (11)

美国2040年的历史课本会类似这样描述……当中国在建设强大国家的时候,印度毫无头绪。印度部长们在赚钱,政府机器在抢钱,人们忙于炫耀靠贩卖进口产品而赚到的财富,修建宫殿似的房子,还不纳税。这个国家对中国的威胁并没有觉醒。当中国2019年攻击印度的时候,印度没有对策。战争在三天内就结束了……

Rathore (Delhi) 17 hrs ago
When ever Hindu decreased India decided. We lost Afghanistan and Burma from British India as Hindu were few there. 1947 we Lost Pakistan and Bangladesh due to less Hindu. In Kashmir, Kerala and north east problem only due to less Hindu. We will divide again if Hindu decreased in any part of India. Save Hindu save India. because without Hindu there will be no India.
Agree (28)Disagree (9)Recommend (11)

每当印度教徒减少,印度就(分裂?)…。我们失去了英属印度的阿富汗和缅甸,原因是那里的印度教徒太少。1947年,我们失去了巴基斯坦和孟加拉国,也是由于印度教徒太少。在克什米尔、克拉拉邦和东北部,问题也仅归咎于印度教徒太少。如果印度任何地方的印度教徒减少,那么我们会再次分裂。拯救印度教徒、拯救印度。

t (bangalore) 21 hrs ago
US and India should together fight with china. So it can be beaten easily. China is growing no doubt but their ego is on cloud.
Agree (28)Disagree (12)Recommend (11)

美国和印度应该联合对抗中国。这样可以轻易打败中国。毫无疑问,中国在发展,不过太自我了。

rajivechaurasia (HARIDWAR)
IF CHINA SEA BELONGS TO CHINA THEN INDIAN OCEAN SHOULD BELONG TO INDIA AND CHINA SHOULD KEEP AWAY FROM INDIAN OCEAN.
Agree (24)Disagree (3)Recommend (7)

如果中国海属于中国,那么印度洋应该属于印度。中国应该远离印度洋。

Bholu (Delhi) 18 hrs ago
China and Islamic terrorism are the two threats the world has to deal with in 21st century.
Agree (22)Disagree (14)Recommend (7)

中国和ysl恐怖主义是21世纪全世界必须处理的两个威胁。

VSGR (Bangalore)
China is really becoming very aggressive in its sphere of influence. It is definitely a worrying sign
Agree (22)Disagree (5)Recommend (9)

中国在自己的势力范围变得非常好斗。它无疑是令人担忧的迹象。

Saikat Roy (Dubai)
Any sea out side country line – any one can explore. This is not china’s fathers property.
Agree (21)Disagree (1)Recommend (6)

国境线外的任何海洋,任何人都可以开发。这不是中国祖先的财产。

Arjan (India) 15 hrs ago
So whats China going to do, china simply cannot afford to disrupt exports to the US which account for 35% of its GDP currently, while Europe and other world economies slow down including Chinas, its threats are simply hot air. Besides China needs to change its policy of belligerence with its neighbors. China has border disputes with all its neighbors with annexation of areas with Mongolia, and of course Tibet, disputes with Japan, Phillipines, Vietnam and lets not forget India, all these nations can have an impact on China with economic consequences if not militarily, China will have to settle all these disputes if it wishes to regain any respect and cordial relationships with these countries.
Agree (20)Disagree (4)Recommend (2)

所以中国打算怎么做呢。仅仅对美出口遭到破坏,中国就无法承受,它目前可占到了GDP的35%。欧洲和包括中国在内的其他世界经济体的经济在放缓,中国的威胁只是吹牛而已。此外,中国需要改变对邻国的好战政策。中国和所有邻国有边界争议……比如日本、菲律宾、越南,还有别忘了印度。所有这些国家如果不能在军事上对中国产生影响,那么可以给中国造成经济后果。如果中国想要重获这些国家的尊敬和亲切关系,那么就必须解决这些问题。

Amit Chaudhary (Gurgaon, Haryana)
No country has a right to claim or warn others over international waters…. if US is wrong, China is also not right….
Agree (18)Disagree (5)Recommend (5)

没有国家有权利在国际海域上声张主权或者警告其他国家…如果美国是错的,那么中国也不对…

FDSA (DC)
INDIA ALSO NEED TO DEPLOY NAVY
Agree (16)Disagree (1)Recommend (2)

印度也需要(在那里)部署海军。

make modi PM (bangalore) 19 hrs ago
our future PM modi can help relieving tension between china and india on oil share in south china. Modi has already made good friendship with china and i think it will benefit lot if he become our PM
Agree (16)Disagree (13)Recommend (6)

我们未来的总理穆迪可以帮助减轻中印之间在南海石油份额上的紧张关系。穆迪已经同中国建立了友好关系。我认为他要是当上总理会带来好处。

Chandrika (Chennai)
China is trying to play aggression here when it has no reason to. Beyond Chinese Waters, any neighbouring country can explore oil or gas. America too has no right to place their fleet in strategic regions that would create security problems to other Nations. Both these Nations think they rule the world and are threats to world peace.
Agree (16)Disagree (3)Recommend (3)

中国没有理由的时候就试图在这里耍侵略行径。除了中国海域之外,任何邻国都可以开发石油或者天然气。美国也没有权利在战略地区部署可能对其他国家造成安全问题的舰队。两个国家认为自己应该统治世界,它们都是世界和平的威胁。

sudheer (Hyd)
indian policy is good, straight forward and clear but very slow in action. its good that india always tries to solve issues unlike others who creating problems.
Agree (16)Disagree (1)Recommend (2)

印度政策不错,直截了当、清晰明了,不过行动非常缓慢。不错,印度总是试图解决问题,其他国家则是制造问题。

Noname (France) 18 hrs ago
One must never forget the lesson from Indo china 1962 history. Already pakis are so vulnerable and Chinese are inside POK (Indian territory) , now Indian government should really increase defense budget and make India strong enough to have their own stand in case of any conflict with china. I believe Chinese understand & respect only muscle power. Instead of getting cot in cross fire we should prepare ourselves and can have a balance relationship with china after solving border & Indian global economic disputes amicably.
Agree (15)Disagree (3)Recommend (2)

你永远不能忘记1962年中印战争的历史教训。巴基斯坦太脆弱了,中国人已经进入了巴占克什米尔(印度领土)。印度政府现在应该提高国防预算,让印度强大到能够在未来的中印冲突中站稳自己的立场。我相信中国人只理解和尊重实力。与其彼此责难,我们倒不如做好自身准备。在友好解决边界争议和印度全球经济争议后,我们可以拥有平衡的中印关系。

Syed Hafiz (KSA)
Only China has the guts to threaten United States, the rest including India and Pakistan have no other alternatives than to succumb to Amerca’s pressure!
Agree (14)Disagree (14)Recommend (1)

只有中国有勇气威胁美国。包括印度和巴基斯坦在内的其余国家除了屈服于美国压力之外,没有其他选择!

原创翻译:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com

homer (uk) 16 hrs ago
Bo Yang Chinese writer says.”When Chinese are weak they become slaves. When they are strong they become arrogant”. That is the history of the Chinese.
Agree (14)Disagree (3)Recommend (3)

中国作家博洋说过:“当中国人虚弱的时候,他们就变成了奴隶。当中国人变强大的时候,他们就变得傲慢”。这就是中国人的历史。

anku6 (New Delhi)
Wow! China warns and USA Shivers? Did China think that every country in its neighborhood is like the country grabbed by it, TIBET?………… What is funny about China is that even after threatening its neighbors, it says they have “genuine wish” to turn the South China Sea “into a sea of peace, friendship and cooperation,”
Agree (14)Disagree (9)Recommend (1)

哇!中国警告,美国颤抖?中国是否认为每个邻近国家都像xz那样?……有趣的是在威胁邻国后,中国却说真诚希望把南海变成和平、友谊和合作的海洋。

AsianunitedSimon (Uk) 17 hrs ago
America just made another costly mistake which bind Russia and China closer as a united front as a result. My prediction is the US will have another rethink and it’s small alliances in Asia will pay the price of making the wrong bets. It is always the small people who suffers..
Agree (14)Disagree (5)Recommend (3)

美国犯了另一个严重错误,让俄罗斯和中国走得更近,结果形成联合战线。我的预测是美国将会重新考虑,它的亚洲小盟友将为错误的赌注付出代价。

Royal Prerogative (India)
China is one country which has territorial disputes with nearly all the Countries it borders. Moreover, being aggressive and possessing one of the two Primary and Powerful Armed Forces in Asia, seeks to project itself as the Superpower of Asia and in the long term the World. So, if the USA seeks to check China’s clout, it should be welcomed by Asian countries, so as to ensure a multipolar Asia, which is in the interest of the world.
Agree (12)Disagree (5)Recommend (1)

中国是一个同几乎所有邻国存在领土争议的国家。更重要的是,它具有攻击性,拥有亚洲两个强大武装部队之一,寻求以亚洲超级大国的姿态出现,长期目标是世界超级大国。所以,如果美国寻求遏制中国的影响力,那么亚洲国家应该表示欢迎,这样可以确保符合世界利益的多极亚洲。

Truth (Global) replies to Abdul Majid
Don’t blame USA. Blame the stupid chinese policy of picking up fight with every neighbouring country. USA just sees an opportunitiy to intervene. China needs to work towards improving its relations with its neighbours.
Agree (12)Disagree (3)Recommend (3)

不要指责美国。应该指责愚蠢的中国人同每个邻国对抗的政策。美国只是看到了干涉机会。中国需要努力改善同邻国的关系。

Vijay (Hyderabad)
China is always trying to bulldoze itself, it wants nearly every country or its part to be a part of china, when will this stop, it wants arunachal, leh laddakh , its already taken Tibet, it wants south china sea, surprisingly, it does not want part of Pakistan ?????
Agree (12)Disagree (2)Recommend (3)

中国总是试图恫吓自己。它几乎想要每个国家或者这些国家的部分地区成为中国的一部分。它什么时候才会消停呢。它想要阿邦,列城、拉达克。它已经夺取了xz,还想要南海。令人吃惊的是,它就不想要巴基斯坦的部分领土?

Farooq Sameem (Moratuwa,Sri Lanka.) 20 hrs ago
China has quiet rightly warned America against muddying the placid waters of South China sea,which is of immense geopolitical strategic value to China.South China sea belongs to China,South Korea,Taiwan and Vietnam .Managing it for the benefit of its stakeholders is their duty.The American interference in South East Asia need to be resisted.The US plan to transfer bulk of its fleet including six aircraft carriers to the Pacific region is a resentful move.that endangers the balance of power in the. region.America is concerned about the growing economic and military power of China as it is likely to challenge the American supremacy here and its influence over the countries in the region..China is a rapidly rising power in the world and its rise is welcomed by the Third World countries as it is bound to bring about the most needed balance of power in the International arena with China as a counter weight for the US..
Agree (12)Disagree (13)Recommend (5)

中国悄悄警告美国不要在平静的南海搅浑水。南海对中国有巨大的地缘政治价值,它属于中国、韩国、台湾地区和越南(三泰虎注:无语,连韩国都扯进来了)。美国在南海的干涉应该遭到抵制。美国打算将包括6艘航母在内的大部分舰队转移到太平洋地区是令人愤怒的举动,危及该地区的权利平衡。中国不断增长的经济和军事力量可能挑战美国在这里的霸权和美国对该地区国家的影响力,所以美国对其表达关注。中国是快速上升的世界大国。它的崛起受到第三世界国家的欢迎。随着中国成为美国的制衡力量,它肯定将带来国际竞技场急需的力量平衡。

Thinker (China) replies to t 20 hrs ago
India should stand on her own feet instead of looking for a new master!
Agree (12)Disagree (1)Recommend (2)

印度应该独立自主,而不是寻找新主子!

S.Singh (London) 12 hrs ago
US is the biggest market for Chinese goods and if US shuts this lifeline then Chinese economy would go into tail spin and its economy will be pushed back atleast 30 years back. Chinese would have to live on rats and cockroaches. Yes, US gets credit from China but US will go along with China as long as its moves are not against the US interests around the globe. Also, it US stops paying interest on credit it took from China, there is nothing (zilch) China can do. The Chinese economy will come to a stand still. US is still super power milltarily with high tech defense capabilities which may take another 50 years for China to achive. The US can shutdown entire South China sea and there is nothing zilch) China can do. China is just a huge paper tiger with no real power militarily or economically the mighty USA. Bloody Hell!!
Agree (11)Disagree (12)Recommend (1)

美国是中国产品的最大市场。如果美国掐断这个生命线,那么中国经济将跌入低谷,至少倒退30年。中国人将只好靠吃老鼠和蟑螂生活。是的,美国从中国那里借款。只要中国的举动不违背美国的全球利益,美国就会同中国走下去。此外,如果美国停止向中国支付贷款利息,中国也没辙。中国经济将会趋于停滞。美国仍将是军事超级大国,拥有中国需要50年才能取得的高技术防卫能力。美国可以关闭整个南海,中国一点办法都没有。中国只是没有真正军事实力或者经济实力的巨大纸老虎!

Rajendran (Doha)
US will not interfere in Chinese issues as they know that Chinese can destabilize US economy in no time… Most of the credit of US is from China.. They cant oppose & suppress China like they did to small countries..
Agree (11)Disagree (4)Recommend (4)

美国知道中国人可以立刻破坏美国经济,所以美国不会干涉中国事务…大多数美国贷款来自中国。他们无法像对待小国那样反对和压制中国。

summet (shanghai) replies to Pratul Birla 17 hrs ago
just superb, believe me, I am in China past 10 years. What you have said now will happen.
Agree (11)Disagree (2)Recommend (5)

说得好极了。相信我,我过去10年呆在中国。你现在所说的将会发生。

Abdul Majid (srinager kashmir)
let the America go to hell,why are they poking there nose everywhere, South China sea is asubject between India and China to discuss and decide. Why Barak Obema wants to deploy six war ships to south china by 2020. Does it mean they want to threaten India and China, Both ndia and China should evolve strategies to desist America to send his war ships in this region.
Agree (11)Disagree (14)Recommend (4)

让美国见鬼去吧。为什么他们要到处插手事务。南海是印度和中国之间讨论的话题。为什么奥巴马想要在2020年前在南海部署6艘战舰。是否意味着他们想要威胁印度和中国。印度和中国应该发展战略,以抵抗美国往该地区派遣战舰。

vicky (hyderabad) replies to deepa 20 hrs ago
Our problems are genuine. China is imperialistic, Pak is the terrorist, Bangladesh has mafia, smugglers and land grabbers near our borders, Burma & Myanmar are the same and trained ULFA against us for Chinese, Sri Lanka kills tamils and tamil fisherman in our watres and is gifting naval bases to China(read against India). China on the other hand claims whole South China Sea till the shores of other countries like Vietnam, Phillipines,Malaysia etc. We are exploring Oil in Vietnamese waters, while China is building Roads, Rail, Pipelines, and Underground tunnels in Pakistan occupied Kashmir
Agree (11)Disagree (3)Recommend (4)

我们的问题是真实存在的。中国是帝国主义。巴基斯坦是恐怖主义。孟加拉国在靠近我们边界的地区有黑手党、走私分子和霸占土地者。缅甸也是一样。受过训练的阿萨姆联合解放阵线帮中国人对抗我们。斯里兰卡杀害泰米尔人,还在我们的海域杀害泰米尔渔民,还把海军基地送给中国。另一方面,中国声张整个南海的主权,范围一直延伸到其他国家的海岸,比如越南、菲律宾、马来西亚等。我们在越南海域开采石油,而中国在巴占克什米尔修建公路、铁路、管道和地下隧道。

deepa (Chennai) replies to Abrakadabra 20 hrs ago
We have also problems with the neighbours. We are not in good terms with China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka, Burma, Myanmar and also Nepal
Agree (11)Disagree (12)Recommend (3)

我们和邻国之间也存在问题。我们同中国、巴基斯坦、孟加拉国、斯里兰卡、缅甸和尼泊尔等的关系也不好.

Abrakadabra (Timbaktu)
China needs to ponder if its stand is alright, why so many countries bordering it have problems with it!
Agree (11)Disagree (3)Recommend (4)

中国应该思考下自己的立场是否正确。为什么这么多邻国和它之间存在问题!

RAJ (USA) 22 hrs ago
China should mind well that they can act authoratively, arrogantly with surrounding Asian countries but not with USA. Once upon a time Japan tried to lecture USA about their economic policy and got the taste of USA’s silent indirect reaction by which Japan economy went down. Now China will taste the same kind of reaction from USA, if they underestimate USA power.USA decides which country they want to bring up and which country they want to bring down depends upon their relationship and reaction from other countries. India should learn something out of it and have a good relationship with USA for their self-interest, atleast at this juncnture. If Romney wins Presidential election, China will face more problems from USA.
Agree (11)Disagree (6)Recommend (5)

中国应该牢记自己可以对周围的亚洲国家傲慢,不过不能这样对待美国。日本曾经试图向美国宣讲自己的经济政策。结果美国悄悄间接做出反应,日本经济因此下滑。如果中国低估美国实力,那么也将体会到美国同样的反应。根据美国同其他国家的关系和其他国家的反应,美国能够决定让哪个国家上升,也能决定让哪个国家下降。印度应该从中吸取教训,为了自身利益同美国建立友好关系,至少在这个节骨眼上如此。如果罗姆尼赢得总统选举,中国将面临更多来自美国的麻烦。

JB ( ) replies to RAJ
Those days are gone when a handful of Countries were rich and US could do what it felt was right. Japan is still the most significant economic power and if you take the ratio and proportions Japan is way ahead of USA. Don’t bring up the ultra ethical Japan into this dirty politics of the US.
Agree (10)Disagree (3)Recommend (3)

只有少数国家富裕和美国可以为所欲为的时代已经一去不复返了。日本仍然是最重要的经济大国。如果按比例来算,日本遥遥领先美国。别把日本牵扯进美国的肮脏政治中。

altaf (mumbai) 1 day ago
Why does the americans need to get their warships to asia? If iran had done the same military action was inevitable, is the so called international community sleeping?
Agree (10)Disagree (4)Recommend (0)

为什么美国人需要把军舰派往亚洲?如果伊朗这样做,那么军事行动就不可避免。所谓的国际社会睡着了?

Deepak (Mumbai) 1 day ago
1962 was more than 50 years back. India needs to come out its inferiority complex and look at future. If we go on war, China has more to lose than us. So they will never wanna go for a full fledge war.
Agree (9)Disagree (7)Recommend (2)

1962年已经过去了50来年。印度需要走出自卑情结和展望未来。如果我们交战,中国比我们的损失会更多。所以他们永远不会想要全面战争。

原创翻译:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com

Proud Indian
When we want to deal with Pakistan and China, we unconsciously run to our colonial masters and scream for “help, help” to Christian nations as though they are waiting to do free service for us. Then we brag that we kicked out the British from India while desperately waiting in long que for British and American passports and willing to quit Bharat Mata any time. Then we curse about Muslim invaders but next day stand in long que for jobs in front of Sultans and Badshas of Arabia. End of the day, either Allah or Jesus has to feed us. Indians don’t want to live in India but India lives in every Indian:)
Agree (9)Disagree (0)Recommend (2)

当我们想要对付巴基斯坦和中国的时候,我们下意识的跑去找殖皿煮子,向基督教国家强烈要求帮助,似乎他们时刻准备为我们免费服务。我们会吹嘘自己把英国从印度踢了出去,却拼命排队拿英国和美国的护照,时刻愿意离开印度。我们会诅咒msl侵略者,不过第二天又在阿拉伯独裁者面前排长队等工作。最后,安拉和耶稣都得养我们。印度人不想住在印度,但是印度存在于每个印度人的心中:)

Rajguru (delhi)
China is behaving much the same manner ,Hitler was threatening Germany’s neibhours. Are not the world moving closer to WW-3 ?
Agree (9)Disagree (7)Recommend (1)

中国的行为方式太像了。希特勒当时就威胁德国的邻国。世界正向第三次世界大战走近?

ravi (Mumbai) 1 day ago
China is damaging its own image by showing over agression, giving other countries like India, Japan, Vietnam etc the reason to increase their military might. China should be contempt with what they have and protect their interests. But being too much greedy is always devastating. Also damaging relations with neighbouring countries will eventually not good for China, if China thinks that they can ‘dictate’ neighbours by means of their military and economic might. China’s economy is driven by exports and if China try to do something fishy in so called disputed China Sea, they rest countries will ban China’s ship routes from other sea routes.
Agree (9)Disagree (6)Recommend (0)

中国表现出过度侵略性,破坏了自己的形象,给印度、日本、越南等国家提升军事实力的口实。中国应该满足于自己所拥有的,应该保护自己的利益。太过贪婪总会带来灾难。此外,如果中国认为借助军事和经济实力可以命令邻国,那么会破坏同邻国的关系,最终对中国不利。中国经济由出口推动,如果试图在南海做些可疑的事情,那么其余国家会在其他海洋路线禁止中国船只通航。

rsesq (USA)
So expanding out from the South China sea, we must now take permission from China to put ships into the entire of the pacific ocean??? It is foolishness for china to even suggest such a thing. If the world switches manufacturing to India, Brazil, or other nations, china will not have enough funds to launch a row boat much less attempt to dictate to the US and the rest of the world.
Agree (8)Disagree (5)Recommend (2)

所以范围扩大到南海以外地区,我们现在必须经过中国同意才能把船只开往太平洋?中国提出这样的建议是愚蠢的。如果世界将制造业转移到印度、巴西、或者其他国家,那么中国不会有足够的资金买划艇,更不用说尝试命令美国和其他国家了。

Awake or fall (India) 18 hrs ago
China, India, and other Asian countries need to be wary of Christianity, the political tool which is used by west to spread their empires. I think continent wide rule should be made to check Christian population. We all shout about Muslim population but the actual conspiracy is to hide their numbers by shouting loudly about Muslims. Believe me there are more Christians in India than shown in census reports. Ever heard of the term crypto-Christian?
Agree (7)Disagree (4)Recommend (3)

中国、印度和其他亚洲国家需要提防基督教。它是西方用于扩张帝国的政治工具。我认为应该制定覆盖全州的遏制基督徒人口的规则。我们msl人口问题上大声疾呼。不过真正的阴谋是,他们大声抱怨msl是为了掩盖基督徒人口问题。相信我,印度的基督徒人口比统计报告所显示的更多。听过地下基督徒这个术语没?

Siloo Kapadia (Singapore)
For USA, China is tomorrow’s Al Qaida and Iraq. Today’s Al Qaida is yesterday’s Japan. Yesterday’s Japan was the Arabs of the 1970s. The Arabs of the 1970s were the communists of the 1960s. The communists of the 1960s were the Nazis of before that. And so on… USA needs an enemy. Any enemy. After China? It will definitely be India! Even now they are blowing the alarm sirens. Not to worry. It is all mostly hype for their own people, many of who know the American empire is sinking and are making for the exits.
Agree (7)Disagree (5)Recommend (5)

对于美国来说,中国是明天的基地组织和伊拉克。今天的基地组织是昨天的日本。昨天的日本是1970年代的阿拉伯。1970年代的阿拉伯是1960年代的共产主义者。1960年代的共产主义者是此前的纳粹,等等…美国需要敌人。中国之后呢?那肯定是印度!他们甚至现在就拉起了警报。别担心。大部分是为他们人民准备的炒作而已。许多人知道美帝国在衰退,在退出舞台。

mrxexon (USA)
China doesn’t have much of a navy. Yet. Our presence there is taking advantage of this weakness. The only thing it’s going to accomplish is another arms race as China will respond by building ships. Which they can do far cheaper than we can. We bankrupted the Soviet Union over this kind of thing. China may repay us with the same method.
Agree (7)Disagree (3)Recommend (2)

中国没有太多的海军。我们在那里可以利用这个弱点。中国会以制造军舰作为回应,所以唯一的结果是另一场军备竞赛。在这场军备竞赛中,他们的成本比我们低得多。我们通过军备竞赛让苏联破产。中国可能以同样的方法报复我们。

Amit Bhattacharjie (Dubai, UAE)
Tell me please, is there oil in the South China Sea, except in the region where Brunei is? May be this must be the reason Mr. Panetta. And China is the only power today which can stand up and voice its views, even set up a certain kind of block.
Agree (7)Disagree (6)Recommend (1)

请告诉我,除了文莱所在的地区,南海是不是都有石油?也许这就是原因。中国是今天唯一可以站起来表达自己观点的国家,甚至还设置了某些障碍。

rancho (delhi) 1 day ago
we have military edge over china,we have missiles,so no need to worry
Agree (7)Disagree (10)Recommend (2)

我们对中国有军事优势。我们有导弹。所以没有必要担心。

Ninad Varadkar (Bahrain)
China’s talks at world meeting and actions and talks from within China nerevr seem to match……….
Agree (7)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

中国在世界会议上的言论和在国内的言行似乎从来不匹配….

Mohan (India) 1 day ago
China,correct yourself first before lecturing…
Agree (6)Disagree (7)Recommend (0)

中国,训斥别人前请先纠正自己

Prabhakar Rao (Mumbai, Maharashtra, Ind)
Chinkies are trying to annoy the mighty USA. They will loose everything they built in the last 3 decades. This happens when arrogance rules them. USA has strategically encircled the China now.
Agree (6)Disagree (4)Recommend (0)

中国佬试图惹恼强大的美国。他们将会失去过去30年取得的一切建设成果。当傲慢在他们那里占上风的时候就会发生。美国已经完成了对中国的战略性包围。

John (Goa)
China should learn from “Battle of Troy”. China doesn’t have good relations with its neighbors.
Agree (6)Disagree (5)Recommend (1)

中国应该从“特洛伊之战”中吸取教训。中国和邻国关系不好。

Gaurav (India)
Both powers flexing their muscles! Let’s see who gets the upper hand finally!
Agree (6)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)

两个大国都在施展自己的力量!让我们看看谁会最终占上风!

原创翻译:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com

Bal (Dra) 1 day ago
What is the proof that the South China Sea belongs to China???? Hope it is not a piece of paper that showed some lines traced by a Chinese sailor. Well if there was no oil, it would not be a part of China. Well still their fishing vessels enter the sea boundry of some the small nation around the SCS, drag the fish out from there as well. Its the fault of the Chinese who act like DADA’S in the region and then cry when they see someone strong coming to help these nations. In fact China has no friends in this world. Their Arrogance will fail them. Their aim is to be a supersuper power on the cost of others. They see the other Asians inferior to them. For the exception of Japan Who wakked them in world war 2. Their aim is to sell their products to keep spinning their factories so as to keep their people occupied. For that they dont care to whom they sell it can be also their greatest enemy in their mind.
Agree (5)Disagree (5)Recommend (0)

南海属于中国的证据是什么?希望不是上面有中国船员留下几行字的一张纸。如果没有石油的话,它就不会成为中国的一部分。他们的渔船进入南海周围小国的海域,还把那里的鱼捕捞走。这是中国人的错,它在那个地区的行为就像老大一样。当有强大的国家过来帮这些国家的时候,中国就大呼小叫。实际上,中国在世界上没有朋友。他们的傲慢会让其失败。他们的目标就是以其他国家的代价成就自己的超级大国。他们认为其他亚洲人更劣等。唯一的例外是二战时摇醒他们的日本。他们的目标是贩卖产品,让自己的工厂不停的运转,让人们不会无所事事。正因如此,他们不介意产品是卖给谁,就是最大的敌人也照卖不误。

Rohit Ahluwalia (Australia)
China has no right to claim the South China Sea. It should be used by the whole world and should be kept free of any ones control
Agree (5)Disagree (5)Recommend (0)

中国没有权利声张南海主权。它应该由全世界共同使用,不应该受到任何国家的控制1

Ramani Krishnamurthy (vadodara)
At the present situation,China is most powerful country and could dictate terms not only to India but also to US and rest of the world. No one will dare to go war with China,and when threatened no one take it lightly including US. But quite ironically,the Chinese domination will come to end through natural calamities, only to become a weak nation,sooner or later.
Agree (4)Disagree (22)Recommend (1)

在目前形势中,中国最强大,不仅可以对印度,还可以对美国和其他国家发号施令。没人敢同中国交战。当中国发出威胁的时候,没有人可以轻视,包括美国在内。不过非常讽刺的是中国人的统治会因自然灾害而结束,迟早会变成弱国。

Dharmendra Gupta (Mumbai)
USA has nothing to worry, the barking chinese dogs can only bark at USA but cannot bite
Agree (3)Disagree (2)Recommend (2)

美国没有什么好担心的。狂叫的中国人只能对着美国大喊大叫,并不能咬…

slumbai2012 (delhi)
USA is nothing,india will be superpower in 2015.

美国没什么大不了的。印度将在2015年成为超级大国

友荐云推荐
  1. ………“美国和印度联合,可以轻易打败中国,中国在发展,不过太过自我了”………
    是的,这一点没人怀疑,中国的炮火实在对隔千里之外的美国望洋兴叹.但三哥和美国顾问就在面前.战争结束的那一天,印度会被美国的原子弹炸成一片焦土,加上中印战争期间的前一层焦土,总共两层.试问美国为什么要打印度,因为美国人民喜欢良心发现.又要发战争财,试问美国为什么又要丢滚烫的原子弹于三哥的头上?那是因为美国大兵金贵,并且13亿人都消灭了,估计世界上也没有什么人了,再给三哥最后一锤子,也没人投反对票.最后补充一下,中国打仗的时间一般估计是半个世纪,慢慢打,而美国人急功近利,所以喜欢想到原子弹.
    “中国在发展,不过太自私了”,中国本来一穷人,她努力埋头苦干实属迫不得己,她不象三哥有人帮忙。何况三哥那么优越,截目前为止,你愿意和土共共同发展吗,你瞧得起她吗?
    中国的祖先聪明,爱给子孙后代开荒和根据渔讯在南海作业,如果南海有争议,那么对于不到三百年历史的美国来讲,西海岸一带都存在归属争议.到底归谁,按美国人的逻辑,只要三哥比它凶狠,就是三哥的。“什么历史依据?”三哥也可以给美国人讲“老子要到加拿大去!”这答非所问的一吼,美丽奸只好认吃了哑巴亏.
    俄罗斯和中国走得更近,是俄罗斯和中国突然发现做生意比打仗好玩。因为他们突然发现挤眉弄眼比打架更有情调,也就是说以前喜欢英雄般的雕塑,现在喜欢音乐和爱情诗.总之上海合作组织有三哥的沙发,可以欣赏。金砖的时候大家来合唱,多妙!
    总之,想做超级大国的标准是必须和美国打架,如果印度只想在中国的身上验证自己是超级大国,全世界都会谴责三哥作弊.

  2. 难怪三哥信心百倍,原来他们一直相信英国人是不远万里去为印度服务的,日不落帝国——印度统治下的英国!

    每当印度教徒减少,印度就(分裂?)…。我们失去了英属印度的阿富汗和缅甸,原因是那里的印度教徒太少。1947年,我们失去了巴基斯坦和孟加拉国,也是由于印度教徒太少。在克什米尔、克拉拉邦和东北部,问题也仅归咎于印度教徒太少。如果印度任何地方的印度教徒减少,那么我们会再次分裂。拯救印度教徒、拯救印度。

      • 印度和英国是两个独立的主权国家,而且从地理和历史的角度看都是单纯的被殖民和殖民的关系;中国的元、清两朝是中国历史的一部分,汉族是被蒙古族和满族击败过,可那又怎么样?中国又不是只有汉族一个民族!两者有可比性么?
        挑拨中国民族关系有意思么?挑拨一时爽,全家HZC!

  3. “掌握着2个亚洲最强大的军队之一的中国”

    等一下,我被雷到了,如果我没猜错的话,另一个应该是。。。

    牙买得,苦大萨伊。。。。

  4. 我发现很多印度网民都喜欢说一句话:中国和周边所有国家都存在边界争议。(所以是中国的不对?所以中国是坏人?)

  5. 中国警告美国不要在南海兴风作浪,中国人民也非常愤怒.不要说60%,就是整个美国海军力量聚结南海,中国人民都不畏惧,因为畏惧并不能避免毁灭,因此有何惧哉。
    主权声张就是中国与生俱来的,即使在历史上,我们的清政府软弱无能,美国和西方在割她时,都签定了条约,这些条约就是不要她声张的声张,当时的西方列强有鉴于当时的工业化程度,都是抢劫地面财产罢了,如果当时就是用石油驱动庞大的工业体系,按美国和西方的德性,就会出现心虚的《黄岩岛条约》之类的东西或者是18**年*月*日南中国海惨案之类,这对美国来讲,中国人并不难想象。49年,解放军会按照蒋介石的九段线到达曾母暗沙.之所以人民解放军没有乘竹筏到那里,是因为不存在争议。
    中国南海的海床上,有中国先人的锅碗瓢盆,印度洋的岛屿礁石上存在着三哥先人的大便吗?所以南中国海是中国的,印度洋是公海,要把中国赶出印度洋,就看三哥的航空母舰牛不牛,至于美丽奸的航母,废铁一砣。因为世界上确实不存在神话.

  6. 阿三永远是笑料的源头,我本以为能上得起网的阿三在某些知识层面上会了解的多一点,没想到依然是一群愚民,悲哀的国度。。。。 😀

  7. 当法国买印度的战斗机,中国进口印度的核反应堆,美国买印度的计算机,印度帮助俄罗斯翻修航母的时候,一部分三哥还是三哥。而现在很多印度网民却不是三哥,心态有说不出的从容和但丁.真希望印度有英德法的重量,享受享受来自大洋彼岸的关怀。看你遇见的是加拿大的和风细雨还是中国遇害的劈头盖脸(草民断定是后者,因为老美己经见识了你和中国的雷同之处.不过小一号罢了,老美的想法是每次不经意回头都能看见你三哥丢魂的双眼的时候再说),假如三哥的邻居是希特勒,还容忍你三哥优哉游哉地坐在电脑前胡说八道,新德里上空早就响过凄厉的空袭警报,你的破电脑早就发不出你的陈辞烂调.说“中国的行为方式太像希特勒,”也太风马牛不相及了.安心睡你的觉,你的邻居是中国,不是你崇拜的西方元首.中国警告美国也就封顶了,中国的东西再落后毕竟是自己的货,她可以和任何人打十年八年,什么稀奇古怪的战术都有滴。其它仗势欺人之徒,手里的刀再锋利毕竟自己不是铁匠,收敛点.草民虽然中国一穷人,但我的国家毕竟不担心路边有炸弹,试想在其它国度,本来就穷,还一不小心炸掉了腿,或瞎了双眼,这岂不是活在人间地狱。不是人己经是人了,美国和三哥你就让小民过太平日子吧。你们如太阳般火热宏大的抱负小民实难理解.

  8. 美国无视三哥的地方霸权主义,在它有意无意的疏忽下,才出现三哥明目张胆地宣称烈火-5就是对着北京和上海,”中国可以对周围国家傲慢”这句话放在三哥的头上,说此话的三哥才不致于有失落感.且更符合三哥的抱负.遗憾的是中国不需要别人的提醒,也不想干三哥梦寐以求的事情.更何况铁路多修了两米长,美丽奸都恨得牙痒痒,今天黄海演习,明天太平洋演习,搅得他妈的鸡犬不宁,居然还委屈地说中国不能对美国这样,中国把美国这样了—即:难道中国舰队对着旧金山对着纽约在演习不成?中国哪有兴趣拄着文明杖表演傲慢干霸权,借用三哥一句话,人家美丽奸是不允许的(它允许老子也不愿意,只要老子愿意谁管他娘的允许不允许)。至于日本经济是美国人悄悄做的反应,只能证明美国太坏.并不是美谈,也只能证明美国并不是正义的化身!连盟友都要在背后捅刀子.美国的实力由想当超级大国的三哥去低估高估.用不着中国人去估.因此不要说美国让谁提升谁就提升,想让谁下降就让谁下降的恐吓的话,不要认为离开美丽奸就活不下去,在哥伦布没有发现新大陆之前,欧洲不是存在了上千年的文明史了吗。这位三哥唯恐天下不乱,冒似苦口婆心地开导别人,是也掩饰不住抑人鼻息的嘴脸。“至少在这节骨眼上”云云,难道美国人马上就要轰炸上海武汉不成?罗姆尼上台又能怎样?每一位美国总统上台都忘不了给中国人麻烦,中国人在这点上可比三哥的见识多了,等他总统先生豪情万丈后,还是规规矩矩过凡人的生活,什么拉链门,电话门,内裤门,总之,吃喝拉撒和小民没区别,装什么神!并不热爱自己国家的三哥,当上二等公民后的嘴脸连镜子都为难.

  9. “中国佬试图想惹恼美国…”,颠过来说,美国佬天天想惹恼中国,从意识形态方面的指责到隔三差五的什么反倾销制裁,总之马被拴在美丽奸的槽上,想怎样抽就怎样抽.目的只有一个,想尽办法让周边国家和中国进行战争,从而将差中国的钞票一笔勾掉.怎么赖?这方面他是行家里手.中国一年举行多少次军事演习,美国举行多少次军事演习.且中国的演习在什么地方,而美国的演习又在什么地方.三哥在网上查是易如反掌的事,如果三哥懒不愿意查,这个没有网络自游的中国人告诉你,美丽奸几乎全年都在军事演习,美丽奸在中国的黄海进行军事演习,老子的水稻田浅,如果水深的话,那特混舰队己经在老子的稻田里了.美丽奸没有哪一天不在中国的家门口耀武扬威,谁惹恼谁?说出来三哥也在偷着乐吧.至于30年取得的一切建设成果,三哥要丧气的,这里面也包括了美国,日本和德国以及世界所有爱好和平的有识之士和中国人民一起奋斗的结果.为什么美国现在不待见,谁知道美国整天在想些什么.中国人也百思不得其解,中国有那么多美国企业在运作,真撞了美丽奸驴党马党牛党的鬼!
    这段时间令三哥忒兴奋的大概是阿鸡肉吧.看看以下三哥可以推推阿鸡肉的下场:
    萨达姆是美丽奸一手栽培的,用于对付伊朗.
    本,拉丹可是美丽奸最有力的抗击苏联红军的自由战士.
    木巴拉克可是美丽奸戴维营的常客.
    卡扎菲心血来潮突然给布什雪中送炭,布大爷还一把鼻涕一把泪的感謝过他.
    很多美丽奸昔日天真烂漫的哥们今日何在?在美丽奸捞到好处后,统统杀掉,毫不手软.至于罪名,那可是美丽奸的强项,,,,,,,命主不命主,到时可由不得阿鸡肉,由主持正义的美丽奸和菲律宾饿得见人就是双胞胎的人民给他冠名.
    “美国己经完成了对中国的战略包围”全世界都被美国包围,但可惜的是中国共产党不是国民党.在中国即使反对她的人,都和她有千丝万缕的联系,产生错觉就只能怪美丽奸吸食过量了.

  10. “当有强大的国家过来帮这些国家的时候,中国就大呼小叫”传神。地球村外交部的填空题,如”“当中国帮助巴基斯坦的时候,印度就大呼小叫。”
    希姐姐假如能听见这位三哥的话,人格猛烈升华.美丽奸的国格指数又往上升个百分点.世界上有很多地方,由于中国鞭长莫及,就缺少大呼小叫,被伟大的美丽奸帮助,美丽奸超高标准的道义使受惠之地患传统与现实的民族精神分裂症。利用这些民族和国家宥于传统相伴生的独菜产生的与现代社会相悖的现象而进行杀戮,独菜的肉体说实在的是被现代文明的精准工具所消灭,但留给受惠国的苦难非受惠国国民恐实难体会.当命煮的大餐端上来的时候,谁能享受?草民并不是说民主不好,但非要用射杀无数本来就被独菜折磨得奄奄一息的人民来交换,似乎又太别有用心.民主是全人类的伟大理想,但美丽奸“人为”的夹杂着不纯的东西,“打包”一起过来,勉不了苦难相伴.现代文明的杀人利器,刀耕火种的民族如何消受。被民主后的社会状况远比独菜的时候更恐怖。幻想美丽奸帮助,那就是穷人羡慕恶人的别所而最终也想占有一样后果可怕。在当今的世界,谁敢占在马克思和卢梭的高度呢,三哥就和草民一样,可笑了.
    “他们认为其他亚洲人更劣等”—十几亿中国人基本上平等,而印度不是吧,印度自己都把人分成好几等,中国人不能干涉印度的内政,所以中国人就按印度的分法认为印度劣等。

  11. 这里很多国内的网民留言其实和印度部分网民一样无知。实际上九段线是没有法理依据的,除了个别真正的岛屿外,南沙大部分都是岩礁,而岩礁是没有200海里专属经济区的,更不能据此要求海洋领土,这实际上也是我们修改九段线定义的原因,当然,实际上九段线划的这个区域是个什么东西,我们到今天也还是说不清楚,也许只能说是势力范围?
    并不是中宣部无能,而是要求的东西太大,其中有明显不合理的地方。

    • 那你觉得美国从西半球跑到南海来又有多少合理的成分?
      只要软弱,一切都不合理.
      兄台可以跟美国网民讨论讨论中国合理的地方.

  12. 没办法,小民只有无知下去,因为小民从小接受的教育就是我们的领海一直到曾母暗沙,至于修改,那是政府的事,与小民无关.当然小民人微言轻,且小民不是见风使舵之人,让兄台贻笑大方了.
    兄台,你就有知去吧。

    • 捍卫自己的领海,居然变成了要求!半个多世纪以来的九段线变成了说不清楚,太符合美国人的口味了.太可恶了.

      • 根据国际法,领海是基于领土来的,而可以拥有领海的领土是大陆和岛屿,南沙首先很多是岩礁,不是岛屿(这个问题可以参见我国在冲之鸟礁的态度),其次,九段线覆盖范围远远大于基于这些岛屿所领有的海洋面积。
        实际上,九段线来源于十一段线,而十一段线确实就是随手在地图上画的,我们的优势是画完后没有人提出异议,大家当时都不当回事,我们的劣势是,这么一大块U型区域不知道称之为什么好,肯定不是国界线或者领海(这个我们已经放弃了),但到底是什么东西呢?关于这个,我们自己也众说纷纭,有说历史性水域线的、有说历史性权利线说,有说岛屿归属线或岛屿范围线说,其实这么多说法都是一个原因,就是找不到类似的案例划这么一片海洋的。
        我说这些不设计到具体岛屿的归属,实际上,就算所有的人承认所有九段线内的岛屿、岩礁、暗沙都属于中国,依然解释不了九段线划的是个什么范围,中国在这个范围内应有什么权益,别人在这个范围内有什么是不能做的。

        • “这个我们已经放弃了”—是中国政府和非常有国际大法的知识分子们放弃了.至于中国人民,大家心知肚明.
          中国在上海这个范围内应有什么权益,别人在这个范围内有什么是不能做的.这难道不是一目了然的吗?
          弱者当然不知道怎样称呼它了,其实简单得要命—南中国海 中国南海.
          至于以前他们不当回事,那是他们活该.以你兄台以前不当回事这种理由,强权还可以的强权逻辑移栽至大陆上,很多疆土都有以前不当回事的盲区.这又该怎样办?
          难道就这样今天放弃一点,明天放弃一点?按美国人的德性有尽头吗?
          一句话,弱者就是不合理
          不要描了,再描渤海都有问题.

          • 实际上领海是没有自由通行权的,通过必须要获得所在国同意!如果这是中国的内海,那么中国会被群起而攻之的,纸上谈兵很容易的,但是世界是现实的,是一个博弈的过程,中国还没有这个实力这么做,实际上即使是美国,也无法这么做。
            如果坚持这种思维的话,就不要奇怪为什么中国这么在理,还被这么多人批评。理性的说,九段线不可能被解释成国界线,能成为势力范围就不错了。即使所有岛礁都拿回来,非岛屿的200海里经济专属权也不会被承认,正如我们不承认冲之鸟有200海里专属权一样,所以南海合作开发(其实是别人开发,因为我们现在还不具备开发条件)根本就无法避免。

          • 但你必须承认小民只剩下纸上谈兵,整个地球上的小民无一例外.
            其次,无能的政府永远是受屈辱的,美国没有什么没有做,什么美国”也无法这么做”?冲之礁是游戏规则后冒出来的,而南中国海是制定游戏规则的产物.

          • 在领海内当然不准自由航行,这还用说,只是中国办不到而己.并且即使是领海中国非常例外地准了自由航行,冰冻三尺非一日之寒以致造成了今天可恶的局面.

          • 当成为亡国奴的时候,可能都还不能达到理性,要被人赶进焚尸炉时,可能理性就出来了.
            坚持这种思维又当如何?
            中国的哪一样东西美国不批评?

          • 如果是图打嘴炮,当然可以继续.并且对我于你的过激言论不计较表示对你个人感到佩服,有条理地回复我很满意,回复的说辞我没有接受.

  13. 有些我们国内的说法,是根本拿不到桌面上去说的,这也是中国政府在国内给人软弱的印象,实际上在国际上整个就是你讲道理我耍流氓,你耍流氓我讲法制。
    比如钓鱼岛,为什么日本能实际控制,原因是法理上清政府给琉球照会过,承认这个岛是琉球管辖下,所以中国要取得法理证据,唯一就是抛出琉球地位未定论,顺便说一下,钓鱼岛日本有法理优势,我们说是传统渔场(那个什么慈禧给盛宣怀采药地什么的根本在国际法上就不能作为依据),同时是我们的大陆架延伸,这一点决定了我们在这块地儿资源采集占优势,所以日本嚷嚷着要合作开发。而南沙是别人的传统渔场,我们有法理优势,但同时是别人的大陆架延伸,所以我们嚷嚷合作开发。。。。。。同时我们坚决拒绝多边会谈,只同意双边会谈,无他,我们的证据在不同地儿自个打架。

    • “有些我们国内的说法,是根本拿不到桌面上去说的”
      这种话纯粹是为政府和军队的不作为进行的开脱.并且网络上经常听到这句话.没有任何国家的军队不守卫海疆,只有中国自以为是地用什么渔政船.

  14. 米日淹堡条约对四岛不起作用,对日本本土该起作用吧,俄罗斯战略轰炸机也绝对在乱七八糟的什么领海权内,美国为什么不敢把俄罗斯的战略轰炸机干掉,试问,爱国者在哪里?
    希拉里的沉默让老子笑掉大牙!她不知道吗?她为什么不吭声!
    神马法理?她是把中国政府的懦弱吃透了.我大声说:“吃透了!”
    让可笑的辨解见鬼去吧!神马博弈过程?居然有这等漂亮的打扮。

  15. rsesq (USA)
    So expanding out from the South China sea, we must now take permission from China to put ships into the entire of the pacific ocean??? It is foolishness for china to even suggest such a thing. If the world switches manufacturing to India, Brazil, or other nations, china will not have enough funds to launch a row boat much less attempt to dictate to the US and the rest of the world.
    Agree (8)Disagree (5)Recommend (2)

    所以范围扩大到南海以外地区,我们现在必须经过中国同意才能把船只开往太平洋?中国提出这样的建议是愚蠢的。如果世界将制造业转移到印度、巴西、或者其他国家,那么中国不会有足够的资金买划艇,更不用说尝试命令美国和其他国家了。

    =========================================
    中国南海向来畅通无阻,从来没有商船过往需要中国的同意和说法,美国距中国南海7000余公里远,派军舰跑到自古就属于中国发现和命名的南海来示威和挑战中国的主权是对的吗?