2013-11-16 18:42 40个评论 字号:


译文来源:三泰虎 http://bbs.santaihu.com
外文标题:China to ease one-child policy: Xinhua


BEIJING: China will relax its one-child policy, state media said on Friday, in a major policy shift announced days after the conclusion of a meeting of top Communist Party leaders.


The change to the family planning law will let couples have two children if one of them is an only child, state news agency Xinhua reported, citing a “key decision” made by leaders at this week’s gathering, known as the Third Plenum.



译文来源:三泰虎 http://bbs.santaihu.com/thread-7860-1-1.html

pawan22778 ()
had to if the nation had to sustain


Rory Breaker (Neverland)
When you want to take over the world, you need a large army. Lots of soldiers, rifles in hand, that’s what makes a good occupying force ~ just sayin’


Firozali A.Mulla (Dar-Es-Salaam Tanzan)
I think it is a fab idea THE economy of the China will grow up more now


tejinder (Location)
If anything, India should learn and emulate “one child policy” from China. The way India’s population is increasing, India will be number one in population and number one in the number of “hungry people”
Agree (1)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)


sushil (Lucknow)
India don’t care that is why here 3,4,5,……..piglets/puppies are allowed precisely on religion/cast basis?


George Chungath Cheru (I N D I A)
Let them make as much they wants


v.aggarwal578 (INDIA)


Sukhdarshan Sehgal (Unknown)
some chance for india to still remain no 2 lol


True Indian (blore) replies to Sukhdarshan Sehgal
No Chinese families nowwont prefer more than 2 kids so their population will stabilize at this number. But how about us..?? Its rising and rising…


Neeraj Lohan (Faridabad)
“The change to the family planning law will let couples have two children if one of them is an only child” — what does that mean??:- a) one of the parents is the only child??? . anyways happy that wight on earth and pressure on nature is going to increase…


True Indian (blore) replies to Neeraj Lohan
If one of the spouse is only thee child to their parents then that couple can have 2 kids. I hope u understood..


roy (Location) replies to Neeraj Lohan
it means if anyone in a couple which has no siblings, then this couple can have 2 child.


Praful Deshmukh (bathinda)
India should adopt one child policy at least for 5 years to maintain our population.
Agree (1)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)


True Indian (blore) replies to Praful Deshmukh
we need atleast 20-30 years to considerably bring down the population
Agree (0)Disagree (0)Recommend (1)


True Indian (blore)
India shud learn from them… We dont have senses to see and adopt what china has implemented proven and working system.. They put the Child policyy and when population came under control with significant human development index they are going back. But now Chinas population wont rise they know it. Coz once Human development index grows up families prefer to choose 2-3 kids which will stabilize the population. We need to raise the girls marriage age irrespective of religion and implement 1- child policy. Hope modi will do that




pad23au (Location)
The truth is one child policy has created huge demographic imbalances in China as both grandparents (paternal and maternal) became depended on one child to look after them due to this China saw huge increase in old people and decreasing level of working age people,precisely for this reason China has lifting the restrictions.China’s development can be attributed to their dynamic leadership which were ruthless in carrying further reforms at the same time India having large pool of young population and skills suffering due to opportunistic and corrupt leaders.
Agree (0)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)


Firozali A.Mulla (Dar-Es-Salaam Tanzan)
My hat is off to China. Once a severe critic of socialism and government control, I have watched China grow from a third world basket case in the 1960s to the 2nd wealthiest country on earth. And China’s forced one child policy is largely responsible for the “China Miracle” While forced family planning seems severe and out of place in our culture, it has done what China’s leadership intended it to do. China was once a poor nation where even a bicycle was a luxury. Estimates are that over 100 Million of people died of starvation in the numerous great famines between the 1800 and 1960. Millions of Chinese left the country seeking a better life elsewhere. The”One Child policy” is one of the biggest factors in catapulting China from a third world country to the 2nd wealthiest country on earth in terms of GDP. With parents concentrating all their resources and efforts on fewer children, those children have had a better chance at a better education, more opportunities, and increased wealth through inheritance. In the 1960s China had a population of 667 million to India’s 450 million. Today that figure is 1.35 billion to India’s 1.23 billion. In fact, ten years the population of India will actually surpass China By 2050 the population of The US is projected to increase by 16%. India’s on the other hand will increase by a whopping 24%. But China’s population is projected to increase by only 3.9% from it’s current rate The One Child Policy has had some unintended consequences It has created an imbalance of male to female…and in future China will have to solve the problem of and aging population with too few younger people. But, like the US, labor shortages can be solved by adjusting immigration policy. Which is A far better choice than having too many mouths to feed.
Agree (1)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)






  1. 印度早就该计划生育了,国土面积只有中国三分之一,人口却相当,不知道他们怎么承受的了

  2. 中国不是第二世界国家吗?整个西方都认为中国是共产国家,到今天也没改变过,怎么三哥认为是第三世界国家呢?1800到1960饿死1亿人?这数据从哪来的?把社会学的或者历史学的报告跟论文给我看看。还有为什么到1960呢?我不太明白,按轮子的话说,文革还死了8000万人,这个就不算了?还有中国永远不可能是移民国家,因为祖先传统

    • 还有中国成为世界第2强国,仅次于美国的强国,主要是依靠共产工业体系和以出口外导向的民用消费品产业作为基础,加上仅次于美国的强大的金融与文化产业实力,跟富裕不富裕没有关系。事实上,瑞士远远比德国富裕,或者科威特远远比伊朗富裕,但是有谁认为他们是power center吗?没有一个

    • 中国是第三世界 是当时中国领导人提出的 好像三个世界的划分是太祖最开始说的 1800-1960 饿死一亿 虽说有点多 不过我觉得也不是太离谱。光天平天国运动后 北方同治回乱 中国人口减少上亿。饿死的不在少数 到后期 军阀割据 日本侵华 解放战争 困难时期。。。多灾多难的祖国 😥

  3. Neeraj Lohan (Faridabad)
    “The change to the family planning law will let couples have two children if one of them is an only child” — what does that mean??:- a) one of the parents is the only child??? . anyways happy that wight on earth and pressure on nature is going to increase…

    “如果夫妇一方是独生子女,那么可以生两个孩子”——这句什么意思?父母一方是独生子女?不管怎样,地球承受的重量和大自然承受的压力将会加大—————————————————————————————————–这位老兄高见啊 中国人口增加是增加 印度这么疯狂的生的就不是人啊 这话说的真对 应该给这位老兄颁奖 中国14亿 印度13亿 但是印度不想办法降低人口 我们有个保持人口的方法就不对了 想法太逆天了 应该给予鼓励

  4. 印度黑鬼智商很低啊,其实就是黑种串了,说起来同在亚洲,的确不是一路人啊。清醒地三哥不是好三哥。

  5. 最近看了几个记录片,都是关于人与动物之争。平均每个小时就有一个种类灭绝。这还不够严重么。亚洲象,我国以前曾经在黄河以南一直到海南岛都有分布过,但是现在只有西双版纳有几百头了,而且现在当地人类种橡胶树,又大大压缩了它们的生存空间。这样的例子举不胜举每天都在发生。人类不是太少而是太多,没有解决现有人类的生存问题之前不要再盲目大幅扩张了。

    • 其实我觉得就算不放开二胎也不是什么大事,人类已经不显少了,中国人也不少,中国人一定要比其他文明多么

    • 中国前些年进行的是粗放型发展,依靠廉价劳动力,破坏了自然付出了环境代价。现在也知道可持续发展,科学发展观了。
      为什么单在人口方面看不清楚还不清楚什么是粗放什么是细腻呢,人口数量和人口素质必须兼顾。人口数量基本还是稳步增长,而人口素质呢,看看现在的年轻人,是 更聪明了但也更懒了,教育啊这才是根本。看看现在的教育吧不但没什么改革反而小学老师都开始和女生开房了。高层在这方面到底在想什么。

  6. 看来印度网民还是有些见地的.一个经济不发达,民智不开放的大国不强制生育,经济发展战略就是句空话.而中国终于过了这一关.至于开放二胎到鼓励生育也会随着新一代成为主力军,新观念的形成而到来.一直关注老美的国力.现在看看印度的,感觉很不错哈.

  7. 向中国致敬。我曾经是反对社会主义和政府控制的严厉批评家,见证了中国从1960年代毫无希望的第三世界国家发展成地球上第二富裕的国家。——有三哥清醒了!!!!快上恒河水灌翻他!!