从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

克里称美国在南海保持“中立”

2016-07-26 21:10 112个评论 字号:

John Kerry says US neutral on South China Sea, wants China to follow laws

约翰克里称美国在南海保持中立,希望中国遵守法律

VIENTIANE: US secretary of state John Kerry says the United States has no position in China’s disputes with Southeast Asian nations in South China Sea, but only wants all parties to follow the rule of law and settle their differences peacefully.

He said on Tuesday that a recent international tribunal’s decision on a case brought by the Philippines against China — which went against Beijing — is final and binding and based on international law.

“We absolutely support rule of law, the legal process and diplomacy,” Kerry told reporters ahead of a regional security conference being hosted by Laos.

China, which also is attending the conference, has rejected The Hague-based tribunal’s decision, saying it has a historical claim over most of South China Sea. It says all disputes should be resolved bilaterally.

美国国务卿约翰克里表示,美国在中国和东南亚国家的南海纠纷上不采取立场,只希望有关各方遵守法律,和平解决分歧。

他说,最近国际法庭就菲律宾对中国的诉讼所作出的裁决是有约束力的,是基于“国际法”的。

中国拒绝了该裁决,称其对南海大多数海域具有历史权利,强调所有争议应双边解决。

9d9e0d8fgw1f67lqramsej20b0089aay

资料图

印度时报读者的评论:

译文来源:三泰虎   http://www.santaihu.com/2016072605.html

外文地址:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/John-Kerry-says-US-neutral-on-South-China-Sea-wants-China-to-follow-laws/articleshow/53394286.cms

Anthony Morais

We have seen nothing yet. To China, Security Council membership means that it is above the law and can use its veto to deny India entry to UNSC and NSG. One day it will make even Hitler look like a nice friendly person. Hope India is strong to stand up for itself by then!
0 0 Reply Flag

对于中国来说,常任理事国的身份,意味着可以凌驾于法律之上,动用否决权反对印度加入安理会,反对印度加入核供应国集团

总有一天,希特勒都会相形见绌的

希望到时候印度是强大的

 

Sushil Seth

When you say that the decision of world court is final & binding for all parties then how are you neutral?However you are avoiding confrontation with the aggressor Beijing who is refusing to accept the verdict.
2 0 Reply Flag

既然你说裁决是有约束力的,是基于“国际法”的,这样说怎么算是保持中立呢?

你是在避开与北京对峙,后者拒绝接受裁决

 

PAVAN P

CHINA MUST FOLLOW THE RULING OF THE UN TRIBUNAL OR BE EXPELLED FROM THE UNITED NATION SECURITY COUNCIL! JAI HIND!
1 0 Reply Flag

中国要么遵守,要么被赶出安理会

印度必胜

 

Radiance

Despite Chinese disregard, arm-twisting and bullying in South China Seas, US is STILL neutral. But the day isn”t far when US will have to favour the weak and that day China will have No Choice but to fight – AND EVENTUALLY LOSE
1 0 Reply Flag

尽管中国无视他人,盛气凌人,美国仍然保持中立

美国偏袒弱者的那一天不会遥远的,到时候中国没得选择,只能开战,最终会输掉

 

Indian Citizen

If the dispute remains unsettled for decades then it is mandatory of others” interference by default and one more issue exist in India is Kashmir.
1 0 Reply Flag

如果纠纷几十年都未解决,那么其他国家就强制性干涉,印度也有类似的纠纷,那就是克什米尔问题

 

Ch Prasad

chinks and yankees both are dangerous only…they can do anything for their own benefit
1 0 Reply Flag

中国佬和美国佬都是危险的

会为了自身利益而不择手段

 

Anthony Morais
When China was weaker economically and militarily it used to follow rules and protocols in order to gain acceptance. Now that it has managed to benefit from worldwide recognition it does its best to prevent India from gaining the same acceptance and the leverage that comes with it and and feels that it can flout international rules because it neither fears the UN or the US and believes it can manipulate both.
1 0 Reply Flag

当中国经济和军事实力弱的时候,为了获得认可,中国通常遵守法律法规。

获得了全世界的认可后,中国转而阻止印度享受同样的待遇,自以为可以藐视国际法,不怕联合国,也不怕美国,以为可以操纵两者。

 

Pranab Basu

We can”t expect any rule of law to be followed by Pakistan or China.
1 0 Reply Flag

别指望巴基斯坦和中国遵守法律

 

Peacemaker

Mr. Kerry, we know that. Everyone wants China to follow laws but it isn”t. And you and the world doesn”t seem to be doing anything tangible to restrain it.
0 0 Reply Flag

克里先生,众所周知,大家都希望中国遵守法律,但是他就不遵守

你们都不采取措施来对其加以限制

友荐云推荐
    • 奥巴马要下台了,不愿意在任期最好捅什么篓子了,留给下任和中国对峙了。即使下任是缺爱的老女人上台,我们也不怕

    • 台湾更胜之,不单单网民如阿三般自我意识过剩,连他们的官员、立委、名嘴都是如此,本来是民进党洗脑屁民,然后把自己人甚至自己也洗脑了

  1. 中国是安理会常任理事国,黑三不是。中国有一票否决权,黑三没有。所以中国不许黑三进安理会,不许黑三加入核供应国。这就是法律,黑三必须遵守。

  2. PeacemakerMr. Kerry, we know that. Everyone wants China to follow laws but it isn”t. And you and the world doesn”t seem to be doing anything tangible to restrain it.0 0 Reply Flag克里先生,众所周知,大家都希望中国遵守法律,但是他就不遵守你们都不采取措施来对其加以限制=========================美国说的很清楚,美国不会动手,只会在精神上支持。剩下的就看谁对TG不满,谁就自己出手。这是美国给三哥表现的机会啊!三哥喝碗神油赶快上啊

  3. 也不知道印度啥时候能明白枪杆子里出政权,拳头才是硬道理!安理会,核供应进不去,说白了就是你实力不行,当年中国进安理会难道就是因为二战战胜国?别忘了之前中国可是跟联合国干了一架,还干赢了!这个世界永远是强权至上!何为天道?不听话,碾压过去!何为王道?听话,也碾压过去!何为霸道?亲,今天该你被碾压了哦!这就是真理!

  4. 仲裁的概念是什么 这是需要双方都达成协议自愿把纠纷提交给第三方去裁判的 中国从来没有跟菲律宾达成过任何协议共同把争议交给任何机构去裁决 这样的仲裁是不合法的 说有约束力也就骗骗白痴

  5. 超级大国印度大旱 超过400农民自杀,他们的官员爆出了比‘神的旨意’还劲爆的言论,自杀的农民都是鬼上身了,所以才自杀的。不愧是超级大国,大印度必胜

  6. 这个荒唐的所谓“仲裁案”根本就是美国导演的,现在“中立”?真不要脸!这些智商80的货一厢情愿的盼望这出闹剧能够压制中国,大大失望了!联合国和国际法庭都否认与仲裁庭有关了,阿三还在拼命喊“国际法”,“安理会”,智商真有80吗?一如既往作弊的吧!

  7. PAVAN PCHINA MUST FOLLOW THE RULING OF THE UN TRIBUNAL OR BE EXPELLED FROM THE UNITED NATION SECURITY COUNCIL! JAI HIND!1 0 Reply Flag中国要么遵守,要么被赶出安理会印度必胜滚蛋!! 南海仲裁案和联合国安理会根本没有半毛钱关系!!

  8. 其实美国人真聪明,这么一说,中国领导层面子上过得去,虽然里子并不这么认为,还是偏袒,要不然也不叫亚洲再平衡战略了。。。。。。

  9. 一个臭要饭的,偏赶上智商还那么低,臭烘烘贱嗖嗖的天天总想着跟恶霸、大佬讲道理平起平坐,到头来永远都是个要饭挨揍的命

  10. 尽管中国无视他人,盛气凌人,美国仍然保持中立美国偏袒弱者的那一天不会遥远的,到时候中国没得选择,只能开战,最终会输掉————————————你说你特么是真傻还是装傻?美国在你眼里真成救世主了还偏袒弱者?!你看中国是弱者的时候他会不会这么客气?炸大使馆撞飞机这特么都是谁干的还偏袒弱者?

  11. PAVAN PCHINA MUST FOLLOW THE RULING OF THE UN TRIBUNAL OR BE EXPELLED FROM THE UNITED NATION SECURITY COUNCIL! JAI HIND!1 0 Reply Flag中国要么遵守,要么被赶出安理会印度必胜===========让我看到很多中国键盘侠。

  12. PeacemakerMr. Kerry, we know that. Everyone wants China to follow laws but it isn”t. And you and the world doesn”t seem to be doing anything tangible to restrain it.0 0 Reply Flag克里先生,众所周知,大家都希望中国遵守法律,但是他就不遵守你们都不采取措施来对其加以限制—————————哈哈,美国白皮猪对此怎摸看

  13. 对于中国来说,常任理事国的身份,意味着可以凌驾于法律之上,动用否决权反对印度加入安理会,反对印度加入核供应国集团————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–黑皮三你什么时候才能提高你的智商呀?

  14. 他们也许一直都不理解一点,弱国无外交,强国制定游戏规则,三哥继续非暴力不合作,也许适合他们自己的国家,但绝对不适合全球。

  15. RadianceDespite Chinese disregard, arm-twisting and bullying in South China Seas, US is STILL neutral. But the day isn”t far when US will have to favour the weak and that day China will have No Choice but to fight – AND EVENTUALLY LOSE1 0 Reply Flag尽管中国无视他人,盛气凌人,美国仍然保持中立美国偏袒弱者的那一天不会遥远的,到时候中国没得选择,只能开战,最终会输掉 这黑三还是不懂,美国偏袒弱者??????哈哈!

  16. 不要这么气愤啦,其实克里是在帮我们,他的潜台词是——我们美国立场是中立的,你们中国要遵守法律哦,但仲裁庭的仲裁有法律效力吗?没有,所以中国完全不用遵守喔当然以黑鬼阿三的智商,看不出克里的潜台词是可以理解的……