三泰虎

金奈至新德里高铁,印网友从高铁谈到1962年战争

China plans world's 2nd largest high-speed rail line in Chennai

中国计划在金奈修建世界第二长高铁

本文是评论续,第一部分:印媒:中国计划在印度金奈修建世界第二长高铁

9d9e0d8fgw1f3epti7mqfj20j60crtbj

9d9e0d8fgw1f3eptgk2ctj20j60eptax

9d9e0d8fgw1f3epterojqj20qe0h7grx

9d9e0d8fgw1f3ept9fx17j20ix0cmq4k

印度时报读者的评论:


译文来源:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/2016043003.html



Vijayaraghavan Sadagopan (CHENNAI)

a lot of groundwork to be done if we need to ga with this and also we will face our own hurdles like land acquisiton and others. Definitely fine if it work out
Agree (1)
Disagree (0)
Recommend (0)
Offensive

要建这条高铁,很多基础工作要打好。

我们将面临征地难等问题

如果产生预期效果,那肯定好了

 
Natanam Iyer (California)

In the running of bullet trains, Japan has a proven capability. China is yet to establish this as they are new to this technology.
Agree (2)
Disagree (1)
Recommend (0)

日本高铁的运营能力是得到证明了的

而中国还有待证明,他们是高铁技术的新手

observer 888 (South Africa) replies to Natanam Iyer


China has more experience in running of high speed trains than Japan because of scale. China has more than 19,000 km of HSR as oppose to 3000 km by Japan. By 2020, China is expected to have 30,000 km.
Agree (0)
Disagree (0)
Recommend (0)


中国高铁规模更大,相关的运营经验更丰富


中国有1.9万公里高铁,而日本只有3000公里高铁


到2020年,中国高铁有望达到3万公里


Natanam Iyer replies to observer 888


Is it not because Japan is small in area and China very big?
Agree (0)
Disagree (0)
Recommend (0)


难道不是因为日本国土面积小而中国国土面积大吗?


KP () replies to Natanam Iyer


Chinese technology is advanced than Japan's. Japan is still testing its maglev technology.
Agree (2)
Disagree (0)
Recommend (0)


中国技术比日本技术先进


日本仍然在试验磁悬浮技术


Natanam Iyer replies to KP


Since the introduction of Shinkansen by Japanese decades ago, there is not a single accident till date though the speed of the trains are 280-320 km per hour and the trains leave Tokyo every 15 minutes on an average. Japanese technology is definitely more reliable.
Agree (1)
Disagree (1)
Recommend (0)


自从日本开通新干线以来,速度达到280-320公里每小时,且每15分钟就有一列车从东京发出,然而迄今为止没有发生一起事故。


日本技术肯定更可靠



 
Indian (Vadodara)

Under no circumstances, India should allow China to come near to its markets be it Railways or for that reason anything. How can we afford to deal with the most cunning nation in the world? Can we forget 1962?
Agree (4)
Disagree (1)
Recommend (0)
Offensive

任何情况下,不管是铁路还是其他领域,印度不应让中国进入印度市场。

中国是世界上最狡猾的国家,印度和这样的国家打交道的代价是承受不起的

我们忘记了1962年的那场战争?

Vinod Agarwal (Asia) replies to Indian


That was history. This is not 1962. We should try to move on.
Agree (1)
Disagree (0)
Recommend (0)
Offensive


已经成为历史了


现在不是1962年


我们应尝试继续前进


Krishna M Singh (Unknown) replies to Indian


1962 was caused by both nations if u read history. Yeah they won war but than it wasn't started by one side. Good thing is they moved back to pre-1962 line of control saying talks shud solve issue not war. Cann SINGLE person say why they moved back and give their won land in 1962 back to India???? Think. China was till Assam but still they moved back to pre-1962 border. They could have occupied both Assam and Arunanchal that time in war?. So talks only shud resolve issue and we should not hate China just for 1962. I agree we must make sure its repeat doesn't happen. For train, whosoever give technology to us should be welcome. We should be self reliant after a project or two from outside.
Agree (3)
Disagree (0)
Recommend (0)


读一读历史,你会发现1962年那场战争两国都有错


他们是打赢了那场战争,然而这场战争并非是单方挑起来的


好的方面是,他们撤退到了1962年之前的控制线,称要用谈判来解决问题,而不是用战争


有人能解释下吗,为什么1962年他们撤退,让出占领的领土?


想一想吧,中国当时已经打到了阿萨姆邦,但是后来撤回到1962年之前的边界


当时他们本来可以占领阿萨姆邦和“阿邦”的?


所以,要用谈判来解决问题,我们不能因1962年那场战争而仇视中国


确实,我们不能让战争重演。


至于高铁,谁给技术,我们都应表示欢迎


外国帮我们完成一两个工程后,我们就应自力更生了


KP () replies to Indian


For 62 its Nehru to be blamed for Chinese invasion ....
Agree (1)
Disagree (0)
Recommend (0)


1962年,是尼赫鲁造成中国入侵的...



此文由 三泰虎 编辑,未经允许不得转载!:首页 > 印度人看中国 » 金奈至新德里高铁,印网友从高铁谈到1962年战争

()
分享到:

相关推荐