从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

中国2019年飞行FC-31隐形战斗机

2015-11-29 12:32 55个评论 字号:

China to FlyFC-31 Stealth Fighter by 2019: Reports

报告:中国2019年飞行FC-31隐形战斗机

A year afterunveiling the FC-31 stealth fighter, Chinese officials say a production versionof the fifth-generation aircraft — the country’s answer to the American-madeF-35 Joint Strike Fighter — will fly by 2019, according to multiple news reports.

在公开FC-31隐形战机一年后,中国官员称这款第五代战机的投产版本——中国为应对美国F-35而研发的战机——将于2019年飞上蓝天,据多个新闻媒体报道。

Li Yuhai, deputy general manager at China’s Aviation Industry Corp., known asAvic, and Lin Peng, the FC-31’s chief designer, were on hand at the DubaiAirshow this week to talk about the program.

中航集团副总经理李玉海和FC-31总设计师林鹏本周出现在迪拜航展上谈到了这个项目。

9d9e0d8fgw1eyhqeub1m7j21jk111gqr

资料图

以下是网友评论:

译者:跑龙套
来源:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com/bbs/thread-376986-1-1.html
外文:http://defensetech.org

Beno · 1 weekago +10
It seems to haveas much in common with the F22 as the 35 if you look at the nose ****pitposition, engine arrangement and wing positioning.
It remains to beseen if it can fulfil the expanded role fit of the F16 or F35.
Do the Chinesehave enough of the “lock on AFTER launch” weapons required for internal carragestealth ?
There is A LOTof technologies you need to support a low observable aircraft. Simply having aplane, ( even if for the sake of argument that airframe is as good as an F35’s) does not a war winner make.
HopefullyPakistan does buy 30, it will be good to get a look at these planes.

说和F31很像,其实和F22也很像,看看鼻子那个位置,引擎布置和机翼位置就知道了。
这种飞机是否具备F16或者F35战机那样的能力,还有待观察。
中国拥有足够的“发射后锁住”武器吗,这是内部轿厢隐形的必备。
低可观测飞行器需要很多技术支持。如果仅仅只是一架飞机(即使这款飞机和F35一样好)并不能让你成为战争的赢家。
希望巴基斯坦真的购买30架,很期待看看这些飞机到底是怎样的。

 

derek · 1 weekago -18
you fool..ofcourse its a copy. Stupid Americans go over budget by billions and can’t evensafeguard their ‘secret’ blueprints from the Chinese xD what are you going todo about it? Countries looking for a bargain will buy from the Chinese insteadof paying billions per plane to USA xD Its better than flying the russian MiGairplanes from the 50’s which is a flying casket compared to these

白痴吖,这当然是抄袭的。愚蠢的美国人花那么多钱来进行研发,却守不住自己的秘密,被中国人窃取。那些想要便宜货的国家会从中国购买,而不是花大量金钱从美国购买,而且比俄罗斯50年代的米格战机好,米格战机和这些飞机相比简直就是飞行的棺材。

 

BravoSierra · 1week ago -12
And yet Lockheedcopied the -35 design from the Russians. Oh the irony.

而洛克希德马丁公司从俄罗斯人那里复制了F35的设计。真是讽刺。

 

Guest · 1 weekago -7
actually theyhired the Russian company to help them with it.

实际上是该公司雇佣俄国人来帮忙设计的。

 

John · 1 weekago +4
wow! China copygreat. She will be destroyed…pity on Chinese people

哇!中国抄袭的真好。这款战机会被摧毁的。。。同情中国人。

 

Vitor · 1 weekago -10
The airframewill be better than the F-35 for sure. Considering that the F-35 struggles tomatch gen 4 planes when comes to the physical aspects. Does anyone doubts thata current Su-35 is better than the F-35 when it comes to thrust, speed,agility?

机身肯定比F35的更好。考虑到F35战机在物理性质上都算不上四代机。在推力,速度和灵敏度上,真有人怀疑苏35比F35来得好吗?

 

David · 1 weekago +7
Yes, the SU-35would be better in an air show Vitor, we can all agree to that. But the F-35 isnot meant to be a high end agile dog-fighter. With that said the SU-35 wouldnot get close enough to the F-35 to dog-fight anyways. The F-22 would provideCAP and destroy all SU-35’s BVR.

是的,苏35在飞行表演上确实更好,我们都同意这一点。但是F35并不是一款高端敏捷的格斗机。话虽如此,但是苏35无法足够靠近F35来发起格斗。F22会在超视距之外将所有的苏35摧毁。

 

anonmyous coward· 1 week ago +6
Even if this isa JSF clone… think of Harbor Freight Tools: the torque wrench there cost$19.99 and was redesigned and built in China. The SnapOn torque wrench of thesame spec is $199.99, will be more precise and last more then a day out of thepackage.
That is just atool… this is a flying super computer. Command based economies have alwaysneeded to beg, barrow and steal technologies that free markets have developedto stay completive. Love or hate the JSF, one can only assume that the knockoff one will have weaker engines, underpowered avionics and not the battlespacecommand of the west’s moneypit.

即使这是抄袭美国的,但是想想Harbor Freight机械工具吧:扭矩扳手在中国的价格是19.99美元,被中国进行重新设计并在中国制造。而同样规格的工具在美国是199.99美元,但是更加精准,而且更耐用。
那仅仅是工具。。。。而战机是飞行中的超级计算机。计划经济总是从自由经济那里乞讨,搬运和窃取已经得到发展的技术从而保持自己的竞争力。不管你喜欢还是讨厌F35,我们可以猜测的是中国的这款抄袭作品在引擎和航空电子设备方面都更弱。

 

oblatt24 · 1week ago
Yea they saidthe same thing about the Japanese just before they wiped out our consumerelectronics and automotive industries.
The fact is thatwhat is sold in the US is dictated by American purchasing agents not what theChinese can produce. These agents know that cheap poor quality is what sells inAmerica.

是吖,人们也说日本对美国的抄袭产品更烂,可是后来我们的消费电子产品和汽车行业被日本打败。
事实是美国市场上销售的产品都是根据美国代理商要求而制造的,并不是由中国决定的。这些代理商知道在美国市场上廉价的次品才卖得出去。

 

Bill · 1 weekago +2
Exactly – Peopleseem to think what China can build is cheap, rather than what the US builds asover-priced.
Everything inthe US suffers from price-bloat, health care, education, civil construction.Americans need to stop patronizing and criticizing the quality of foreign goodsand take a long hard look at what we get for our money.

是吖,人们总是认为中国只会建造廉价的产品,而没有想过美国制造的产品定价过高了。
美国所有东西都受到了价格膨胀的危害,包括医保,教育和土木建筑。美国人不要再对外国产品的质量进行批评了,看看我们自己的产品是什么货色再说。

 

Dfens · 1 weekago +8
Yeah, we havestupid stuff like environmental laws that keep corporations from turning ourland into chemical deserts and our rivers into sewers. We have ignorant lawsagainst slavery and child labor. No wonder we can’t compete with China.

是吖,我们有愚蠢的法律,导致我们的企业无法将我们的土地变成化学沙漠,也无法将河流变成排水沟。我们也无知的法律来反对奴役和童工。难怪我们无法和中国竞争。

 

Lance · 1 weekago +11
Chinese knockoff of the F-35 will enter Chinese service the same time as our F-35s enterservice that’s Ironic.

中国F35抄袭作品将在同一时间与我们的F35进入服役,真是讽刺。

 

Dfens · 1 weekago +1
They won’t payhuge corporations more profit to drag the design of their airplane out fordecades like our military will. Perhaps we could get them to steal that littlesecret from us.

他们不会给大企业支付更多的利润以让他们的飞机设计拖延几十年,而我们的军队会这么做。或许我们应该让他们窃取走我们这方面的秘密。

友荐云推荐
  1. 这世上只有一种人会有这样的想法:我随时可以窥探别人的秘密,我也有秘密,但我的秘密随便谁都能轻易知道。——医学上称之为,傻逼型作贼心虚综合症

  2. Lance · 1 weekago +11
    Chinese knockoff of the F-35 will enter Chinese service the same time as our F-35s enterservice that’s Ironic.

    中国F35抄袭作品将在同一时间与我们的F35进入服役,真是讽刺。
    ================================
    F35不也是抄袭苏联的雅克141吗[弱]

  3. 美国的科技是很发达,但他们似乎忘了他们的工业技术很多都来自于对二战后德国的掠夺,他们拿到了德国积攒了多年的技术,然后领先世界几十年,当他们发现别的国家正在缩短这个差距的时候,就用武力和经济进行破坏,所谓霸权主义都被全世界叫了几十年,美国人不以为耻反以为荣啊

  4. 逆向工程谁都想搞,比如美国,日本,中国,你红头阿三也可以搞嘛?问题是有没有那么聪明的脑子?几千年的奴隶王国能出去给人家打打长工,做做佣人就似乎很有存在感了,还能有神马创新的新玩意?

  5. 有现成的成熟设计为什么还要自己花钱浪费时间重新设计气动外形呢?眼前需要就要随拿随用,只要里面是自己的战时能自产就行,这才是关键,想创新等我们解决了眼前的危机,有闲工夫的时候像制造个飞碟也没人管你啊

  6. 按美国人的逻辑,只要像就是抄袭,那我们造一辆汽车还得从用几个轮子开始是吗,而且可以完全无视之前的科技是吗,一群傻逼,白鬼也是四肢发达而已。

  7. 看这些美国人的评论真是小学文化啊,这些傻比们对战机的研发,和制造基础知识为零!怎么现在世界上怎么那么多的傻比?难道真的不看点关于的知识在来评论呢,这不叫人家笑话吗![哈哈]