China lifts one-child policy after 36 years
BEIJING: China has discarded the one-child policy amid rising workforce shortage and aging population that is endangering the country’s economic growth.
The policy was implemented 36 years back and was seen as a global landmark that reduced an estimated 400 million births and saved millions from starvation.
One child policy declines the population, that’s why we need 2 child policy to keep the population constant.
Dear Indian Parents, Please voluntarily adopt one child policy. We want our families to be prosperous, our children healthy, and our nation in a state where we can provide lot more to all our people than we are providing. Adopt a one child policy so you can take better care of your child.
they’ve realized their mistake
In India, with rising incomes and costs, one child has gained popularity and many couples dont opt for second child.
Coercion and Big Brother knows best as a policy is bound to have unforeseen consequences. We do not know and perhaps will not come to know, what is the mental state of the children, and the troubles of aging parents are yet to be seen..
Unknown – 4 hours ago
THEY NEED BODIES FOR THEIR ARMY TO TRANSLATE THEIR DREAMS OF RULING OVER THE WORLD.
This will lead to increase in world population.
Thank you china.. In the tally of being most populous nation, we’d love to stay behind you.
Good… But how will they feed… Even one child is a burden .
They could also consider allowing immigration. Let us recall that *o’s regime had even suggested export of Chinese Women to western countries to solve their declining population !
Good. But the psyche of restricting oneself to a single child is probably embedded into the present younger generation in China as a result of the general trend and the laws that they have been brought up with. Hope that it does not take another generation to reverse the ‘single-child’ trend.
I think chinese fear that India will take there number one position as the most populous country in the world and so they have given Yes Node to this foolish Policy