从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

女友和妈妈同时遇险,先救谁?来看印度人怎么答

2015-09-30 10:10 77个评论 字号:

Tricky exam question: Mother or girlfriend — who do you save in a fire?

棘手的考题:女友和妈同时遇险,先救谁?

BEIJING: Will you save your mother or girlfriend in case of a deadly fire?

This tricky question was asked to hundreds of thousands of trainee lawyers and judges taking China’s National Judicial Exam which is designed to assess whether the examinee is qualified to practice law in China or not.

The question went like this: If a person is capable of saving his mother but saves his girlfriend instead, is he committing a crime of non-action?

妈妈和女友同时遇到火灾,先救谁?

这个棘手的考题难倒成千上万参加国家司法考试的考生。通过考试才有资格当律师。

考题是这样的:甲能救出母亲,但为救出女友而未救出母亲,甲是否构成不作为犯罪?

201592385511359tua5h

Paper two gave multiple choice options for sections on drug laws, roads, pollution, fraud, bribery, murder and other serious offences.

But Question 52 asked students about “crimes of omission”, posing scenarios including lifeguards failing to save a drowning child, a husband deciding not to rescue his wife during divorce proceedings and someone letting friends drink poisoned coffee.

第52题的题目考学生关于“不作为犯罪”的理解,给出的场景包括救生衣未救溺水的儿童、在离婚诉讼期间,丈夫误认为自己无义务救助落水的妻子,致妻子溺水身亡,以及某人让朋友喝下有毒的咖啡。

Option C told the story of a man who chose to save his girlfriend from a burning building over his mother, saying his actions amounted to a criminal failure to act.

而选项C说的是,某男子在火灾之际,能救出母亲,但为救出女友而未救出母亲。如无排除犯罪的事由,甲构成不作为犯罪。

While the exam has replaced water with a fire, the question is very similar to the hypothetical question about choosing between saving a drowning mother or a girlfriend – a question often asked by girlfriends that ends up putting guys in an awkward dilemma.

虽然考题说的不是落水,而是遇到火灾,不过非常类似妈妈和女友同时落水先救谁的假设性问题。而这个问题经常被女友向男方发问,结果令男方置于尴尬境地。

The ministry of justice later published the answer on September 24, saying that the man would be committing a crime of non-action if he chose his girlfriend over his mother, the Global Times reported.

9月24日,司法部公布了答案,答案显示如果男子选择救女友而不是救妈妈,那么就构成不作为犯罪。

According to the law in China, a son is obligated to save his mother, not his girlfriend.

根据中国法律,儿子有义务救母亲,而对女友则没有法律上的救助义务。

exam

以下是《印度时报》读者的评论:

译文来源:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/2015093001.html
外文地址:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Tricky-exam-question-Mother-or-girlfriend-who-do-you-save-in-a-fire/articleshow/49155837.cms

Pradeep • 10 hours ago

Stupid question. Nothing tricky in this. Always save mother. You will always find another girlfriend, but not another mother

不难回答,肯定先救妈妈

女友可以再找的,而妈妈没有了就没有了

Shatanik Mudgal

that girlfriend of urs might be mother of someone else or maybe daughter… there is no right answer to this question :p

你的女友也许是孩子的妈妈,也是别人的女儿

这个问题没有正确答案

Ra Da
cant agree more! u can find note one but multiple gfs again!lol!

完全同意!你可以再找几个女友!

Prasanta S
Very funny … ha ha ha

非常搞笑,哈哈

narasa.rao24

Times have changed!

时代已经变了!

 

Rahul Dutt
He is innocent who ever he saves, because he didn’t kill any one of them. what kind of justice where a person is not responsible for crime is said guilty.

他是无辜的,不管救谁都有错,他可没有杀人。

 

Shivam Gupta

i will save my mother n die with my gf

我会先救妈妈,然后跟女友一起死

 

Javed Shaik

From a sceintific point of view the gf be saved. All the species will try to pass on its genes before death the mother has already done her part now its the turn of gf( to have kids)

从科学角度来说,应该先救女友。

所有物种都会想方设法把基因传给后代,而母亲已经做到了,现在轮到他女友生孩子了

 

Balakrishna Chadalawada

Stupid question. The choice is between saving one life or losing both. Whoever is easier to save will go out first and then, if time permits, the second one. Sometimes, you need to think with your brain, not heart.

哪个容易救就先救谁,时间允许的话,再救另外一个

有时候你得用大脑思考,不是用心

 

sanky
of course mother. coz if she wouldn’t have given birth to me, I would not be having a girlfriend either.

当然先救妈妈。

要不是妈妈生了我,我也不会有女友的

 

shaumit kumar
The most quirky question that came to surprise as well as humorous to everyone.
Well if it had arrived in any one of the Indian Examination papers,it would definitely be the news of the hour.

既让人惊讶又让人觉得好笑的古怪问题

如果印度考试出现这样的题目,肯定会成为新闻的。

分页: 1 2

友荐云推荐
  1. 因为儿子对母亲有赡养义务,而女友在法律上与儿子没啥关系,因此不救母亲会构成不作为犯罪,这里的女友如果换成妻子那么情况就不一样了

    • 不是这个的事吧?这个题是女朋友问你她和你妈妈同事掉到水里先救那个。不是第三方问。所有这个才是不好回答的问题

  2. Javed ShaikFrom a sceintific point of view the gf be saved. All the species will try to pass on its genes before death the mother has already done her part now its the turn of gf( to have kids)从科学角度来说,应该先救女友。所有物种都会想方设法把基因传给后代,而母亲已经做到了,现在轮到他女友生孩子了==========================科学角度?不是为了强奸吗

    • 我女友,现在的老婆问了我很多次了,我的回答都是先救母亲。你不高兴的话,可以分手或离婚,但是问一万次我也是这个回答。

  3. 你们都忽略了问题所在,记住是女友不是妻子,男女朋友没有法律依据的,所以在法律定义上女友和路人是一个性质,没有法律上的挂钩!这才是关键吧!

  4. 这的问题弱智的人才会提出来的.道理在某些领域才是真理.两边都是最亲密的最容易受到伤害.所以请大家想想.妈妈和女友都是同类人女性.从出生到晚年都会都有经历过相似的事情.女友.结婚.妈妈..

  5. 这道题有漏洞,卢浮宫大火,该抢救蒙娜丽莎的微笑还是其它的名画?正确答案是靠门最近的。所以这题要假设在其他条件相同的情况下该救哪个!如果妈妈在最里面,而且进入的可能并且很可能死亡,当然就还有生还希望的女友了。

  6. 有个阿三说的,我还挺同意的,女友会甩了你,你妈不会,女友会骗你钱,你妈不会,女友说不定会抛下女儿,跟别的男人结婚,你妈不会 ,有时候,说实话,全世界抛弃你,永远有两个人会永远支持你,就是你爸妈

  7. 说是这样说,不过遇到这问题,不用回答,直接跟你女朋友做爱,然后告诉她你是我的一切就行了,女人问这个问题,就是想看你在不在意她,答案不重要

  8. 女人常会问这类问题:比方说,故意说一些言不由衷的话:那个谁谁谁最近老跟我聊微信,烦死了。。那个附近的人,好奇怪,天天有乱七八糟的人加我,可怕。
    女朋友,和老婆说类似的话潜台词:老娘很有市场,你应该多关心我
    还没确定关系的女性说这话潜台词:我还有很多人追,你要小心点,追的更用力些
    如果是老婆女友,应该让他知道,她对你很重要,多哄哄就行
    如果是未确定关系的女性,可以考虑情况,看是否是试探,你是不是喜欢她,也有可能是想让你更加卖力追求他
    你的选择可以有两个,一个是高兴的说,是么?帅不帅?我看看,要我借你钱开房么?
    这样她就分不清你是不是生气,下次不会玩这种无聊的东西
    或者你可以不咸不淡的说,恩,这样呀~如果有的话记得跟我说(这时候女孩会问为什么。然后你别理她,暧昧,暧昧
    当然你也可以顺她的意思,只是有可能,她下次还会这么对付你,直到掏光你的钱,和利用价值
    女人不要对她太好,不然容易不爱你