从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

中国需要远程战略轰炸机打击远方的敌人

2015-07-08 10:48 60个评论 字号:

China needs long-range strategic bomber to strike adversaries farther away: State media

中国需要远程战略轰炸机打击“远方的敌人”

BEIJING: China needs to develop a long-range strategic bomber to strike adversaries farther away from its coast in the event of conflict, state media reported Tuesday, quoting defence experts.

Beijing has been steadily beefing up its military through years of double-digit increases in defence spending, rapidly expanding its naval power, commissioning its first aircraft carrier and adding to its submarine and surface fleets.

据官媒引述国防专家的报道,中国需要发展一款远程战略轰炸机以备发生冲突时打击远方的敌手。

经过数年来两位数的防卫开支增长,北京已经不断加强军事力量,快速壮大了海军实力,服役了第一艘航母,增加了潜艇和水面舰队。

But the government-run China Daily newspaper said in a full-page article that a recent military meeting had deemed the country’s air force a “strategic force”, citing the latest issues of Kanwa Defense Review, a Canada-based defence and weapons technology publication.

The title had previously been reserved for the military’s Second Artillery Corps, which the paper described as China’s “de facto strategic missile force”.

The meeting agreed that a long-range strategic bomber would enable the air force to attack farther out into the Pacific Ocean, the paper quoted Kanwa Defense Review as reporting, as far as the “second island chain”.

官方的中国日报在一篇整版文章中说,最近举行的军事会议把该国的空军视为“战略力量”,文章引述了加拿大汉和防务评论的最新期刊。

而这一头衔以前是为中国二炮保留的,该报把二炮形容为中国“事实上的战略导弹力量”。

会议一致认为,远程战略轰炸机会使得空军有能力攻击远至太平洋的第二岛链

20150708100558278

资料图:轰-6K中程轰炸机

以下是《印度经济时报》读者的评论:

译文来源:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/2015070802.html
外文地址:http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/china-needs-long- range-strategic-bomber-to-strike-adversaries-farther-away-state-media/articleshow/47968683.cms

Ayush Jha (Unknown)

China has the money to invest in all such tech. though india has invested in manufacturing but not much has been done for R&D. R&D is the investment in future. Manufacturing too needs to pick pace in india.

中国有的是钱来投资技术。

虽然印度也投资制造业,但是研发方面的投入不多。

研发是着眼于未来的投资。

印度制造业该加速了。

 

tej delhi (Unknown)

China has the muscle and capacity to develop such an aircraft whenever he feels requirement.

必要时,中国有实力有能力研发一款远程战略轰炸机

 

Dhananjay Gokhale (Roha)

china must saw first problem of their economy .because their stock market are declining day by day and after that they see towards this thing

中国还是先关注本国经济的问题吧。

他们的股市一天天往下跌

 

Ransagi (Unknown)

What is wrong in that? We also need such kind of aircrafts. We can do technology share contract with China.
Agree (1)
Disagree (2)
Recommend (0)

有什么问题吗?

我们也需要战略轰炸机。

我们可以找中国一起技术入股

 

Manohardeep Mann (Nagpur)

No problem for China , as they will steal this technology or will be gifted this crucial technology by the benign and beleaguered Russia.

对中国不是问题,他们会偷技术,或者陷入困境的俄罗斯会把关键技术送给他们

 

Suleiman Haq (Delhi)

The target should be New Delhi and Mumbai and Kolkata and Chennai and Bangalore and Hyderabad
Agree (0)
Disagree (2)
Recommend (0)

目标应该是瞄准新德里、孟买、加尔各答、钦奈、班加罗尔和海德拉巴

 

Santanu (Bargarh)

Chinese strategists conceive of the “first island chain” as the arc stretching from Japan to Taiwan, which includes numerous US military bases on the Japanese island of Okinawa.

中国的战略家设想“第一岛链”是从日本到台湾的弧线,包括美军在冲绳的许多基地。

友荐云推荐
  1. 打美帝和日本我们没有制空权,远程战略轰炸机没有什么意义,最后还是必须靠导弹解决问题

      • 隐形轰炸机是好。。但是你知道美国B2的成本吗?几千亿刀的研制费用就不说了,光光是单价200E刀的造价就够吓人的了。还有超长的研制时间,中国没有10年时间想都别想。对了,还有,B2出动一次的费用是几E刀。。。还有一周的维护时间。

          • 恩,,打错了。。是20E美刀。。不是200E。。。最大起飞重量是200吨。。B2的单位重量价格相当于黄金。。。也就是说,相当于用纯金打造的B2。。

          • 你的说法不太对,20E一架不错,但是对于国家来说不能这么算,因为军火公司赚钱之后要交税,另外开发这种大型项目本身就能拉动高端产业GDP,更多的技术可以应用在多方面,对中国来说,其实开发大轰不但不亏钱,还会赚钱。

    • 第一、光光打日本的话,随便怎么打都虐他。第二、打日美联军的话,要看在哪里打。要是在中国家门口,还真不一定就没有制空权。当然,你要说在公海大洋上和美日打,那就当我没说,真要这么打,那中国的头头们可以去集体跳楼了。

  2. Dhananjay Gokhale (Roha)china must saw first problem of their economy .because their stock market are declining day by day and after that they see towards this thing中国还是先关注本国经济的问题吧。他们的股市一天天往下跌 印度还是先关注本国的屎尿的问题吧.他们的屎尿一天天往上升

  3. The target should be New Delhi and Mumbai and Kolkata and Chennai and Bangalore and HyderabadAgree (0)Disagree (2)Recommend (0)目标应该是瞄准新德里、孟买、加尔各答、钦奈、班加罗尔和海德拉巴攻击印度需要远程轰炸机??不要太自恋

  4. 中国确实在尖端远程战略轰炸机是一片空白,,要研制出比肩Tu-160和B-1的优秀轰炸机,还有很长一段路要走

  5. Suleiman Haq (Delhi)The target should be New Delhi and Mumbai and Kolkata and Chennai and Bangalore and HyderabadAgree (0)Disagree (2)Recommend (0)目标应该是瞄准新德里、孟买、加尔各答、钦奈、班加罗尔和海德拉巴胆颤ING..兔子可不敢这么做….炸起漫天的屎粑粑,这杀伤力能把不怕炮弹与枪林弹雨的兔子吓尿

  6. 国家;买车吗?百姓;不买…国家;买房吗?百姓;不买…国家;生二胎吗?百姓;不生…国家;投资贵重金属吗?百姓;不投资..于是股票暴涨..百姓趋之如骛倾家荡产疯狂买入.沸点到冰点只是一闪念.于是股票过山车刺激一幕再现….交易大厅大屏幕一片环保绿国家;14万亿入账…妈蛋..赚你们点钱还真不容易

  7. Suleiman Haq (Delhi)The target should be New Delhi and Mumbai and Kolkata and Chennai and Bangalore and HyderabadAgree (0)Disagree (2)Recommend (0)目标应该是瞄准新德里、孟买、加尔各答、钦奈、班加罗尔和海德拉巴屎一样的国家,如果中国那么做其实是帮印度打扫卫生了

  8. 渣一样的阿三,不相信中国自己能生产制造,老说中国偷技术。别说是偷,人家就是都给你你阿三都不见得能做出来。什么到了你们印度都会成为屎一样!看看那些食物吧,明明原生态的时候都挺顺眼,可经过印度人之手一做成饭,只有两个字:恶心!

  9. “目标应该是瞄准新德里、孟买、加尔各答、钦奈、班加罗尔和海德拉巴” 三儿怎么什么事都喜欢凑上来把自己当盘菜啊,没人告诉他们不要像苍蝇一样嗡嗡叫,我们的目标是鹰酱和星辰大海