从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

英媒:中国对自己的好运气感到难以置信

2015-04-12 08:37 38个评论 字号:

有网民评论称:“我对世界秩序在资助第三世界方面的变动鼓掌欢迎。让我们拭目以待看看他们是否能干得有所不同。我也很高兴看到美国离开世界领导的岗位,尽管它自己并不情愿。我觉得这对美国来说是好事,这能让它好好想想我们自己的问题,把美国国内事务放在首位。我乐意看到更多这样的消息。”“《金融时报》,你们不能把这个叫做“运气”。别把中国的功劳拿走。应该老实承认,现在发展中国家争相跑到中国哪儿摇尾巴,这说明世界秩序最终还是变了,由美英法意领导的世界现在可能已经临近黄昏。”

译者:AkulaIII
来源:http://tieba.baidu.com/p/3693330533?see_lz=1
外文:http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/1c73b174-d9df-11e4-9b1c-00144feab7de.html#axzz3WtXmtXHg

 8459b724-7c8b-429d-be3f-f84e93c0f894.img

 

 

152414nphbzjnllfl7zf7h.jpg.thumb.jpg

152414djssodmjlsmmsopo.jpg.thumb.jpg

152415emepqglee4os3mbk.jpg.thumb.jpg

152416zzf6k2crfz2ls3e2.jpg.thumb.jpg

152416hbqqrspxluxpu5qq.jpg.thumb.jpg

152416ho6wkz8tzqghf8t1.jpg.thumb.jpg

152417ak51kfrbnnnnc11i.jpg.thumb.jpg

152417s0nj3sn9wz0jojom.jpg.thumb.jpg

152418q4rszflqlzemlmv8.jpg.thumb.jpg

152418jubh6lgpfg9h9bub.jpg.thumb.jpg

下面是网友回复:

1、MrTickle
Is there some sort of bet on how many times the FT can publish the word ‘quixotic’ this quarter?

有没有人来赌一下《金融时报》本季度会多少次用到“堂吉诃德式的”来形容(事件)?

 

2、Realist
Japan apparently wanted to join the new bank but failed to do so out of fear of US anger:
See Asahi Shimbun, INSIGHT: Fear of angering Washington forced Tokyo to stay out of China-backed AIIB April 01, 2015

日本显然也想加入亚投行,只不过害怕美国的怒火罢了。你可以看一下4月1号的另一篇报道《深度:对美国的恐惧使东京远离亚投行》。

 

3、Realist
1. I think China and Israel have had close ties for sometime.
2. The new Sri Lankan president I think is focussed on improving relations with the new Indian leadership (for understandable reasons), and a publicly critical look at China might help

1)我觉得有些时候以色列和中国还是走得挺近的。
2)斯里兰卡的新总统致力于改善和印度的新领导人的关系(原因很容易理解),对中国持公开批判的态度可能对(改善与印度的关系)有好处。

 

4、EdoRoshi
I still don’t see why this is a failure of US policy, or a defeat for the United States. What difference does it make if China starts a large development bank? The total size of any such lending will be only a fraction of daily exchange trading. Does this mean that other countries that have joined will put capital into the bank? Or does it mean that they are simply going to feed at the trough of piles of Chinese money? Or both?

我还是不明白为什么这会是美国的政策失败。由中国来建立一家新的开发银行会有什么不同吗?其贷款数额相对于日常贸易额度来说不过是九牛一毛。这意味着其他加入的国家会向其(亚投行)注入资本吗?还是说这些(加入的)国家只需要等着分红?还是两者皆有?

 

lolc
@EdoRoshi It is not a defeat for the US per se, but it’s more of a defeat for the usual US saboteuring initiatives.

回复EdoRoshi:这本质上来说不是美国的失败,而是美国例行的破坏活动的失败。

 

5、DragonFireBurnTyrants
FT, don’t call it luck. It’s not. Don’t take credit away from China. Rather recognize that the way developed nations have gone running to China, wagging their tails, this shows that the world order is finally changing and the era of US/UK/France/Italy leading the world is now properly in the sunset.

《金融时报》,你们不能把这个叫做“运气”。别把中国的功劳拿走。应该老实承认,现在发展中国家争相跑到中国哪儿摇尾巴,这说明世界秩序最终还是变了,由美英法意领导的世界现在可能已经临近黄昏。

 

6、Jack Armstrong
I applaud the shakeup in the world order of financing third world projects. Let’s see if they do things differently.
And I am glad to see the US disengage from a leadership role in the world, even if it was not voluntary. I think it will be good for the US and allow it to start thinking about our own problems and putting America first. I would like to see more of it.

我对世界秩序在资助第三世界方面的变动鼓掌欢迎。让我们拭目以待看看他们是否能干得有所不同。
我也很高兴看到美国离开世界领导的岗位,尽管它自己并不情愿。我觉得这对美国来说是好事,这能让它好好想想我们自己的问题,把美国国内事务放在首位。我乐意看到更多这样的消息。

 

7、Paul Munton’s Potimarron
Perhaps that nice Mr Putin and his government might copy Beijing’s example and pursue soft power rather than the destructive hard power they have come to prefer. That would be to the benefit of themselves and the Russian people

也许和蔼的普京先生以及他的政府可以学学北京的样子,追求软实力而不是象他们以前说偏好的那样使用破坏性的硬实力。这对他们自己(指普京政府)和俄罗斯人民都有好处。



分页: 1 2

友荐云推荐

无觅相关文章插件,快速提升流量