从这里了解印度人对中国的看法

美国官员:印度拒绝签署WTO协议是一个错误信号

2014-08-02 13:29 56个评论 字号:

三泰虎8月2日译文,美国国务卿克里1日对莫迪总理说,印度拒绝签署全球贸易协议的举动发出了错误的信号,他督促新德里尽快解决争端。7月31日晚,由于印度要求在农业储备上做出让步,一项旨在降低全球关税的世贸组织协定谈崩。“未能签署贸易促进协定发出了令人困惑的信号,破坏了莫迪总理试图传达的印度形象。”克里会晤莫迪之后,美国国务院一名官员对记者说道。

译文来源:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/2014080201.html
外文标题:India’s refusal to sign WTO deal a wrong signal, US says
外文地址:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Indias-refusal-to-sign-WTO-deal-a-wrong-signal-US-says/articleshow/39421416.cms

1362118354654.gif

NEW DELHI/SYDNEY: US secretary of state John Kerry told Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday that India’s refusal to sign a global trade deal sent the wrong signal, and he urged New Delhi to work to resolve the row as soon as possible.

A World Trade Organization pact to ease worldwide customs rules collapsed late on Thursday over India’s demands for concessions on agricultural stockpiling.

8月1日,美国国务卿克里对莫迪总理说,印度拒绝签署全球贸易协议的举动发出了错误的信号,他督促新德里尽快解决争端。

7月31日晚,由于印度要求在农业储备上做出让步,一项旨在降低全球关税的世贸组织协定谈崩。

“Failure to sign the Trade Facilitation Agreement sent a confusing signal and undermined the very image Prime Minister Modi is trying to send about India,” a US state department official told reporters after Kerry’s meeting with Modi.

Kerry was in New Delhi as part of an annual strategic dialogue to revitalise ties and lay the ground for a visit by Modi to Washington in December.

The official said the meeting was “strong and positive” despite the breakdown at the trade talks in Geneva.

“未能签署贸易促进协定发出了令人困惑的信号,破坏了莫迪总理试图传达的印度形象。”克里会晤莫迪之后,美国国务院一名官员对记者说道。

克里在新德里出席为了重振两国关系而举行的年度战略对话,为莫迪今年12月访问华盛顿打下基础。

这位官员称,尽管在日内瓦举行的贸易对话破裂,但是这次会谈是强有力和积极的。

以下是《印度时报》读者的评论:

Pradeep (Mysore)
First blunder by modi govt.
Agree (0)Disagree (3)Recommend (0)Offensive

这是莫迪政府犯下的第一个错误

p u r g e r (jk) replies to Pradeep
Had Indians learnt such blunders earlier on, perhaps we would not have been colonized…

要是印度人早些认识到此类错误,也许我们就不会被殖民了

anonymous (India)
Middle finger to USA ..i.
Agree (2)Disagree (0)Recommend (1)

向美国竖中指

Govind (Location)
…..may be a wrong signal to USA but its a right and strong signal to people of India……………. and mindwell Indians are not your slaves!!!!!!!!! Mr tom uncle!!!!!!!!!!!!! you shrewd double standard hypocrites.
Agree (4)Disagree (0)Recommend (2)

也许对美国是错误的信号,但是对印度人民是正确的强大信号。印度人不是你们的奴隶!你们是搞双重标准的伪君子。

Paramjeet Saluja (Unknown)
US has always dictated terms now its Indias turn, a step to show the world that we are on the way to super power
Agree (4)Disagree (0)Recommend (1)

一直以来制定条款的是美国,此举迈出了一步,向世界表明我们正走在通往超级大国的道路上。

Priyanka (Mumbai)
Good decision by India, America might be a superpower but cant manipulate or dominate other countries
Agree (2)Disagree (0)Recommend (1)

印度做出了明智的决定。美国或许是超级大国,但是不能操控或主宰其他国家

Rascall (Location)
Wondering when will NAMO ban US DOLLAR and EURO for ever and get BRICS currency in India !?!

不知道莫迪什么时候把美元和欧元禁了,让金砖国家的货币进来

I INDIAN (Unknown)
It will definitely affect bilateral ties……..
Agree (0)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)

双边关系必将受影响

Food Security (Vital for India)
Food security is vital for India sustenence in future to feed its billion plus population. India must take this into conisdewration while finalsiing the WTO.

食品安全对印度未来养活十几亿人口是至关重要的。印度在落实WTO协议时务必将其纳入考量。

Chandrakant Bagoria (Bareilly)
kERY Sir If America does it than it is right ,and if India does it than it is wrong?

克里先生,美国做就是对的,印度做那就是错的?

bbassa9824 (Location)
India should sign the deal. Remember, India made a big leap forward economically following late PM P.V. Narasimha Rao’s customs reforms. Also if those many jobs are involved then Indains will be the ones to benefit the most from them. I am wondering if PM Modi has the right expert consultants in his govt. Those surrounding him at this point have not exhibited any grasp of economic fundamentals.
Agree (1)Disagree (5)Recommend (0)

印度应该签署协议。还记得,前总理纳拉辛哈.拉奥进行海关改革后,印度经济上取得了巨大飞跃。此外,即便许多工作受影响,印度人将是获益最大一方。不知道莫迪政府里有没有合适的专家顾问。目前,他身边的人对基本的经济要素都没掌握。

Anonymous (World) replies to bbassa9824
You are viewing one side of the issue.

你只说到了问题的一面

v ()
If and when the U S says India’s action is wrong,we may consider it is right in our interest.
Agree (5)Disagree (0)Recommend (6)

如果美国说印度的行动是错误的,我们也许该认为那样做恰恰符合我们的利益。

kapoor_sc (noida)
India,s stand is genuine. West should understand our concern. Why they can’t agree to our stand.thanx

印度的立场是真诚的。西方应该理解我们的担忧。为什么他们不能认同我们的立场

Subrata Pramanick (Unknown)
The World know our stand on WTO. If the US thinks it is a wrong signal, let them think. Doesn’t matter to us.

全世界知道我们在WTO的立场。如果美国认为这是错误信号,随他们想去吧,对我们并不重要

Dreamhome ()
I am proud to have a Prime Minister like Mr. Modi… America you need us more than we need you. get it clear.
Agree (4)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)

我为有莫迪那样的总理而自豪。美国对我们的需要超过我们对美国的需要。

Feku (Delhi) replies to Dreamhome
Biggest joke! That’s why Indians run to USA?

最大的笑话!这就是印度人蜂拥前往美国的原因?

Ashish (Bagnan)
Nation First is my VOTE. ….. The World would exclude us at their own risk. Our market potential is too high.
Agree (3)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)

我所投的票是国家第一。世界冒着风险将我们排除在外。我们的市场潜力实在太大了啊

Rajender (Unknown)
US wants everyone to say ‘yes boss’ to whatever they say.
Agree (10)Disagree (0)Recommend (8)

美国希望每个人对他唯命是从

Vikk (Hyderabad)
India as a nation has to tend to its own people and serve its interests. If the Interests of WTO are against the nations progress and self reliance then WTO maybe ignored.
Agree (3)Disagree (0)Recommend (2)

作为一个国家,印度必需趋向国民,服务于自身利益。如果WTO阻碍国家的进步,影响自力更生,那么WTO也许可以忽略。

友荐云推荐
  1. 什么WTO,说白了就是“合法”强盗们掠夺俺们印度人的借口,俺们印度人有自己的主见,不会像中国佬一样上那些强盗的当……

  2. 什么WTO,说白了就是西方强盗们“合法”掠夺俺们印度人的借口……俺们印度人有自己的主见,不会像中国佬一样上那些强盗的当……

  3. 未能签署贸易促进协定发出了令人困惑的信号,破坏了莫迪总理试图传达的印度形象。--------------------------------------莫迪先生应该向美国指出:美国不顾印度的实际状况,企图诱骗印度签署将会令印度产业崩溃的世贸协议,被拒绝后还故作困惑,破坏了美国试图传达的美国形象……

  4. Paramjeet Saluja (Unknown)US has always dictated terms now its Indias turn, a step to show the world that we are on the way to super powerAgree (4)Disagree (0)Recommend (1)一直以来制定条款的是美国,此举迈出了一步,向世界表明我们正走在通往超级大国的道路上。三哥真不厚道。。。兔子抵制美帝就是毒菜砖正,三哥抵制就成了正确道路。。。哎。。。三哥们手银的快感更真实些。。。真的。。。

  5. kapoor_sc (noida)India,s stand is genuine. West should understand our concern. Why they can’t agree to our stand.thanx印度的立场是真诚的。西方应该理解我们的担忧。为什么他们不能认同我们的立场就凭三哥你的言论就证明你低于80.。。。为什么要在乎脑残的立场。。。

  6. Govind (Location)…..may be a wrong signal to USA but its a right and strong signal to people of India……………. and mindwell Indians are not your slaves!!!!!!!!! Mr tom uncle!!!!!!!!!!!!! you shrewd double standard hypocrites.Agree (4)Disagree (0)Recommend (2)也许对美国是错误的信号,但是对印度人民是正确的强大信号。印度人不是你们的奴隶!你们是搞双重标准的伪君子。这是你们反中哈美时对中国的评价。。。三哥你们到底那句话是真的。。。

  7. Ashish (Bagnan)Nation First is my VOTE. ….. The World would exclude us at their own risk. Our market potential is too high.Agree (3)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)我所投的票是国家第一。世界冒着风险将我们排除在外。我们的市场潜力实在太大了啊必须的。。。13亿呢。。。每天能卖出26亿份糊糊。。。哇哦。。。点卢比点到手软。。。

  8. Vikk (Hyderabad)India as a nation has to tend to its own people and serve its interests. If the Interests of WTO are against the nations progress and self reliance then WTO maybe ignored.Agree (3)Disagree (0)Recommend (2)作为一个国家,印度必需趋向国民,服务于自身利益。如果WTO阻碍国家的进步,影响自力更生,那么WTO也许可以忽略。三哥用自力更生形容自己。。。那俺们又算神马。。。好吧。。。俺们当晒太阳乞讨的脑残好了。。。

    • Vikk (Hyderabad)India as a nation has to tend to its own people and serve its interests. If the Interests of WTO are against the nations progress and self reliance then WTO maybe ignored.Agree (3)Disagree (0)Recommend (2)作为一个国家,印度必需趋向国民,服务于自身利益。如果WTO阻碍国家的进步,影响自力更生,那么WTO也许可以忽略。先说明,那10亿牲口不计算在内 印度算个屁

  9. 世界办公室还没加入wto?中国专制,印度***,我兔冒着被美帝颠覆的风险加入wto,没想到在美帝制定的规则下比美帝玩的还顺手,印度这世界最大***国家还怕开放,还搞贸易保护怕竞争?

  10. 我越来越发现一个国家的强大需要三个方面因素,一是,优秀的民族,高智商,优秀的历史文化与传统价值。二是,优良的社会制度,不一定要以民 竹与专 制来划分,只要能国富民强就是好制度。三是,开明,英明的领导人(不要毫无行政经验的参议院或人大代表)。

  11. 看阿三,第一点,种族一般,人均智商85,我兔100+。历史文化,现在还有种姓制度。第二点,印度人盲目的制度自信,盲目信西方,每一个个人都是一个既得利益者,严重削弱中央政府。第三点,就看他们爱戴的穆迪有没有一个变革者的勇气与魄力》

  12. 也许对美国是错误的信号,但是对印度人民是正确的强大信号。印度人不是你们的奴隶!你们是搞双重标准的伪君子。英奴还是印度教奴,都tmd一样印度 算个屁

  13. 美国政客是可恨的,但美国佬的思维是理性和智慧的,这与三哥不同,三哥善于掩耳盗铃,是一个思法很奇特的族类,也许他们喜欢呆在自已编制的世界里,哪怕还处在远古的石器时代,有意思哈———-。

  14. 把和中国国土相连的所有国家全部用铁路连接,这些国家的贸易就快捷多了,各个国家边界的铁路自己搞定,统一标准,这样有没有西方都无所谓,亚洲人自己可以发展、壮大滴,当然也不会丢掉西方,也会和西方做生意滴

  15. 印度就是世界上最大的垃圾堆和粪坑,人类生活条件都得到了巨大提升,印度大部分人好像活在原始社会里,随着时代不断变迁,人类的素质和见识.思维模式都得到了增长,而印度人的智商在不进反退,难道是神油用多了神油入脑了吗?难道你们想挑战猩猩的智商吗?

  16. 如果不加入WTO协定,那么和印度人作生意就有很大风险。因为奉行的法律都不一样,他们又不愿意为此付责任。长久对经济是有害的。印度作为一个人口大国无法和中国一样进行计划生育,因为他是所谓自由国家。人口多而贸易和世界大多数国家无法有一个公平的基点…..还有什么潜力可以谈!!

  17. 人口红利是要在外资愿意和你同意他投资你的基础上才会产生人口红利。中国为什么吸引外资,就是因为市场大,而且愿意遵守协定。试想一下,如果你是土豪,你会不会投资一个连基本原则都不愿意签署的国家,那怎么保证你的投资可以得到回报呢?一味只保护自己的本土经济是没有错,可那是付出了放弃大部分外来资金的基础上的。靠自己的资金发展国家,印度任重而道远……